If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Teen driver falls asleep, dies, gets $61M
http://sify.com/news/fullstory.php?id=14014165
17 year old driver FALLS ASLEEP at the wheel, and his Exploder ends up flipping, killing him. Any normal parent would bemoan their son's carelessness and driving while tired. But no, this lot gets $61 million from the car manufacturer. I wonder if the parents are now contemplating clever ways to off their other children and double their money. I hope (for the sake of US residents who'll end up paying the price) that this loses on appeal. God forbid that all cars will now have to be designed to not kill their driver if the driver falls asleep. |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Teen driver falls asleep, dies, gets $61M
Was it a jury decision?
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Teen driver falls asleep, dies, gets $61M
Old Wolf wrote: > http://sify.com/news/fullstory.php?id=14014165 > > 17 year old driver FALLS ASLEEP at the wheel, and his Exploder > ends up flipping, killing him. Any normal parent would bemoan > their son's carelessness and driving while tired. But no, this lot > gets $61 million from the car manufacturer. I wonder if the parents > are now contemplating clever ways to off their other children and > double their money. > > I hope (for the sake of US residents who'll end up paying the price) > that this loses on appeal. God forbid that all cars will now have > to be designed to not kill their driver if the driver falls asleep. Miami: A jury in Miami has ordered Ford Motor Co. to pay 61 million dollars to the family of a teenager who died in a Ford Explorer that rolled over, a lawyer in the case said. Attorney Bruce Kaster said the decision was reached this week after a Ford engineer testified in a deposition that he had recommended in 1989 that the Ford Explorer sport utility vehicle be lowered and widened to increase stability, but that the changes were not made until 2001. Jurors ordered Ford to pay 61 million dollars in compensatory damages to the family of Lance Hall, who died on a Florida highly in 1997 when the Explorer in which he was traveling rolled over several times. The jurors were told that the driver had briefly nodded off and lost control of the vehicle when he woke up. Both Hall and the driver were 17 years old at the time. "If the vehicle didn't have a defect in its handling, in its steering, they would have been able to steer the Explorer back in the road," said Kaster, an expert in SUV rollovers who represented Hall's family. "Ford did not want to delay the introduction of the Explorer. Accordingly, Ford produced a vehicle they knew was unstable in order to maximize their profits," he said. Ford replaced some 30 million tires in 2000 and 2001 after federal regulators documented tread separation was involved in hundreds of Explorer accidents. The three-billion-dollar replacement program was prompted in part by an official investigation that linked 271 fatalities and 800 accidents to events in which Explorers tipped over after parts of their Firestone tires peeled off at high speeds. Bridgestone Firestone last month agreed to pay 240 million dollars to Ford Motor Co. to settle liability over the recall of defective tires linked to the deaths. -------- Sounds to me more like Ford ****ed up big time by rushing a dangerous product to market, and this just follows in the path of the previous Explorer rollover suits. Even if the driver makes a mistake, the vehicle shouldn't be so poorly designed to nearly guarantee a spectacular rollover. Dave |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Teen driver falls asleep, dies, gets $61M
On 17 Nov 2005 20:14:23 -0800, "Dave" > was
understood to have stated the following: > >Sounds to me more like Ford ****ed up big time by rushing a dangerous >product to market, and this just follows in the path of the previous >Explorer rollover suits. Even if the driver makes a mistake, the >vehicle shouldn't be so poorly designed to nearly guarantee a >spectacular rollover. By the same token it doesn't take a rocket scientist to realize that a vehicle with a large height to weight ratio has a very high likelihood of rolling over. Too bad it was the passenger, and not the driver, who received the darwin award. Even with the Explorer redesign, stability isn't going to be good enough for the a lot of teen males drive. -- "Laura Bush Murdered Her Boyfriend" brags of it's homosexuallity: the guys at the bath-house stopped laughing at my 3 inch weenie. : http://groups-beta.google.com/group/...1dd649fb?hl=en Joshua Calvert > demonstrates his lack of understanding of the terms "sarcasm", "irony", and "hypocrisy": Poor rightard, forced to whine about an 40 year old event. Message-ID: > |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Teen driver falls asleep, dies, gets $61M
In article .com>, Dave wrote:
> Sounds to me more like Ford ****ed up big time by rushing a dangerous > product to market, and this just follows in the path of the previous > Explorer rollover suits. Even if the driver makes a mistake, the > vehicle shouldn't be so poorly designed to nearly guarantee a > spectacular rollover. It's not a dangerous vehicle. It's friggin' truck! It handles like a truck. Poorly with a tendency to flip over with sudden movements of the steering input. Those are drawbacks of having truck abilities such as going off road, towing, cargo capacity, etc. Morons using trucks as passenger cars and expecting them not to be trucks is the problem. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Teen driver falls asleep, dies, gets $61M
The driver falls asleep and somehow the result of that situation is the
manufacturers fault. The human race has completely gone nuts! |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Teen driver falls asleep, dies, gets $61M
Brent P wrote: > In article .com>, Dave wrote: > > > Sounds to me more like Ford ****ed up big time by rushing a dangerous > > product to market, and this just follows in the path of the previous > > Explorer rollover suits. Even if the driver makes a mistake, the > > vehicle shouldn't be so poorly designed to nearly guarantee a > > spectacular rollover. > > It's not a dangerous vehicle. It's friggin' truck! It handles like a > truck. Poorly with a tendency to flip over with sudden movements of the > steering input. Those are drawbacks of having truck abilities such as > going off road, towing, cargo capacity, etc. > > Morons using trucks as passenger cars and expecting them not to be trucks > is the problem. They are marketed as passenger cars. It would be unreasonable to expect consumers not to use a product for its marketed purpose. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Teen driver falls asleep, dies, gets $61M
Brent P wrote: > In article .com>, Dave wrote: > > > Sounds to me more like Ford ****ed up big time by rushing a dangerous > > product to market, and this just follows in the path of the previous > > Explorer rollover suits. Even if the driver makes a mistake, the > > vehicle shouldn't be so poorly designed to nearly guarantee a > > spectacular rollover. > > It's not a dangerous vehicle. It's friggin' truck! It handles like a > truck. Poorly with a tendency to flip over with sudden movements of the > steering input. Those are drawbacks of having truck abilities such as > going off road, towing, cargo capacity, etc. > > Morons using trucks as passenger cars and expecting them not to be trucks > is the problem. The problem is that these particular trucks behaved much worse than most trucks even. They made a truck much, much more topheavy, while ignoring their own engineers warnings that it was a really bad idea because it would have cost slightly more to build them properly. The design flaws also included a weaker-than-suggested roof, that caused these trucks to cave in much easier than they should have, in many cases making injuries much worse than if the cab had stayed in shape, as it would in most vehicles in similar crashes. >From what I've read about several of these lawsuits it was that the Explorer specifically was designed in ways that were much more dangerous than other comparable vehicles. I'm not a fan of SUVs, but I also don't like them designed so the driver is more likely to die than they need to be. Dave |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Teen driver falls asleep, dies, gets $61M
"Dave" > wrote in message .. > > I'm not a fan of SUVs, but I also don't like them designed so the > driver is more likely to die than they need to be. > Sounds like a self-correcting problem to me! Bernard |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Teen driver falls asleep, dies, gets $61M
Bernard Farquart wrote: > "Dave" > wrote in message > . > > > > > I'm not a fan of SUVs, but I also don't like them designed so the > > driver is more likely to die than they need to be. > > > > Sounds like a self-correcting problem to me! Yes, the self-correcting mechanism goes like this. Car company makes unsafe product Consumer buys unsafe product. Consumer uses unsafe product. Consumer dies. Consumer's family sues car company. Car company loses money. Car company stops making unsafe product. > > Bernard |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Sloth driver almost dies | DTJ | Driving | 101 | November 4th 05 05:07 AM |
Lunatic falls asleep at wheel, goes airborne and lands on doodin bed | The Man Behind The Curtain | Driving | 2 | June 21st 05 11:20 PM |
A Back-Seat Driver For Your Teen's Car | MrPepper11 | Driving | 5 | February 28th 05 01:47 PM |
BIG BROTHER IS COMING!! (was: teen driver alert) | GPSMike | Driving | 92 | December 19th 04 10:50 PM |