If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#61
|
|||
|
|||
Best no BS motor oil/filter comparison?
"WindsorFox<[SS]>" > wrote in message ... > The three that I have cut open certainly were. I may have had some other > fibers in it to make it a bit tougher, but it tore like cardboard. In fact > one of the three I opened the cardboard end cap had partially separated > from the filter media creating a spot where unfiltered oil could easily > leak through. THAT was the last Fram filter I ever bought, I've never actually seen a Fram end cap detached when I opened a filter, but I have easily detached them. Calling the end caps gasket material is really a stretch. It makes the material sound better than it is, even if it is exactly the same material as used in some gasket somewhere. Gaskets are supported on both sides by solid materials that compress the gasket material to create a seal. The Fram end caps are glued to paper on one side and unsupported on the other. This is a totally different application and the requirements are completely different than for paper used for actual gaskets. Calling the end cap material, "gasket material" says nothing about it suitability for use as an end cap in an oil filter. > changed to NAPA Gold which at that time had been rated #1 by someone, I > think maybe Consumer Reports. NAPA Gold = Wix. The P/Ns are even obviously related. Wix filters are good quality filter at a price comparable to Fram's cheapest filters ( the PH line). The quality of the materials used is far superior and WIX even provides actual performance information (for an example see http://www.wixfilters.com/filterlook...asp?Part=51372 ). Fram just provides advertising copy for their filters that is virtually content free. Amsoil also sells Wix Filters (as Wix Filters as an additional choice to the Amsoil private label EO range that I believe comes from Donaldson). Ed |
Ads |
#62
|
|||
|
|||
Best no BS motor oil/filter comparison?
WindsorFox<[SS]> wrote:
> Mark A wrote: >> "WindsorFox<[SS]>" > wrote in message >> ... >>> Amsoil meets or surpasses API specs, yes, according to them and one >>> type is API certified. There is a difference between can not and >>> refusing to provide some proprietary information. >> >> The big lie. >> > > You have proof of Amsoil lying? If you do I am sure that by all means > a lot of people would be interested in it. > During the whole API debate they lied repeatedly. They came up with amazing fabrications about why they didn't certify their oils, including lying about the cost of certification, and lying about being worried about API leaking the formulation of their synthetic. As it turned out, the real reason was that they knew they couldn't get certified because of the level of ZDDP. What's incredible is that they felt they had to resort to that sort of thing. No one would have thought any worse of them if they had simply said 'hey, our non-API oil is ideal for motorcycles, snowmobiles, or anything without a catalytic converter, but if for vehicles with CATs please use our API certified oil.' When they started making up stories they lost all credibility. |
#63
|
|||
|
|||
Best no BS motor oil & filter comparisons?
On Nov 24, 2:02*am, HiC > wrote:
> I see opinions of the "I swear by" type all over the map. Anyone know > of a good site that shows the truth about which brand/type of oil & > filter performs the best? Thinking in the passenger car realm. > > Thanks I see I'm getting a lot of responses about filters which I appreciate, to clarify, I was asking about oil & filters |
#64
|
|||
|
|||
Best no BS motor oil & filter comparisons?
"HiC" > wrote in message ... I see I'm getting a lot of responses about filters which I appreciate, to clarify, I was asking about oil & filters *********** I dont think you will the find really objective data on oil either. It exists, but for the most part the marketing arms of the formulators create the product information for the adverts. Some of these tests can be obtained for a price, and IIRC it is a substantial price. |
#65
|
|||
|
|||
Best no BS motor oil/filter comparison?
"Brent P" > wrote in message news:zPudnb- .. The manufacturers have too much riding > through the warranty period to take that kind of risk. > I would think that not only the vehicle manufacturer has a lot of exposure, but also the filter manufacturer which sells to aftermarket (like Walmart, for instance) would enter into a chain of responsibility for damage. If you want a cheapo filter, they are on the market. You have to pay for quality, although not necessarily dealer's prices. I have used Fram filters in the past, and have never had an incident with them at all. I use a NAPA filter on our Avalon, and "whatever" on my old van. |
#66
|
|||
|
|||
Best no BS motor oil & filter comparisons?
"HiC" > wrote in message
... >I see I'm getting a lot of responses about filters which I appreciate, >to clarify, I was asking about oil & filters If you want the best oil, get a full synthetic. I don't think anyone will argue that, but some people will say you are wasting your money (but I think you are wasting your money in most cases if you don't use synthetic). Some of the other companies are trying to compete against Mobil 1 more heavily, and you may be able to find some good deals in a full synthetic. Next best would be a synthetic blend (or you could blend your own regular and synthetic oil). Even quart synthetic mixed with 4 quarts conventional will make a difference. If you have a brand new car, I would wait until the first regularly scheduled oil change before switching to synthetic to give time for your piston rings to seat properly. If you have an older car that has never run on synthetic previously, I would use a higher viscosity synthetic (10W-30 or 10W-40), or one especially made for higher mileage cars (Mobil 1 has such a synthetic, not sure about other synthetics). If you are trying to find the best conventional oil, the major brand names are about the same if they have the same API rating on the side of the bottle. |
#67
|
|||
|
|||
Best no BS motor oil & filter comparisons?
Mark A wrote:
> "HiC" > wrote in message > ... >> I see I'm getting a lot of responses about filters which I appreciate, >> to clarify, I was asking about oil & filters > > If you want the best oil, get a full synthetic. I don't think anyone will > argue that, but some people will say you are wasting your money (but I think > you are wasting your money in most cases if you don't use synthetic). Some > of the other companies are trying to compete against Mobil 1 more heavily, > and you may be able to find some good deals in a full synthetic. The Mobil 1 sold in the U.S. is no longer a full synthetic. Redline is still full synthetic, as is Amsoil. Castrol is not. > Next best would be a synthetic blend (or you could blend your own regular > and synthetic oil). Even quart synthetic mixed with 4 quarts conventional > will make a difference. Actually the next best is an oil like Mobil 1 or Castrol Synthetic. These can't be sold as "synthetic" oil except in the U.S., where the court has ruled that oils with non-synthetic base stocks can legally be called synthetic. OTOH, unless you're in extremely cold weather, or have high performance engine that requires synthetic oil, or are trying to extend the oil change interval far beyond the manufacturer's requirements, all the experts agree that there is no benefit in using a full synthetic. |
#68
|
|||
|
|||
Best no BS motor oil & filter comparisons?
"Mark A" > wrote in message ... > "HiC" > wrote in message > ... >>I see I'm getting a lot of responses about filters which I appreciate, >>to clarify, I was asking about oil & filters > > If you want the best oil, get a full synthetic. I don't think anyone will > argue that, but some people will say you are wasting your money (but I > think you are wasting your money in most cases if you don't use > synthetic). I wont argue either way, because I have seen no hard data to compare this generation's synthetics with this generations dino oils. I continue to use high quality dino oil, because I change at 3000-3500 mile intervals and will continue to do so. I have heard that the high quality dino oils are "about" the same quality as the synthetics at this point. Strictly word of mouth, again no credible data either way. IMO, if it is to your advantage to run very low viscosity oils, synthetics may be your best or only choice. |
#69
|
|||
|
|||
Best no BS motor oil & filter comparisons?
HLS > wrote:
> >I wont argue either way, because I have seen no hard data to compare this >generation's synthetics with this generations dino oils. > >I continue to use high quality dino oil, because I change at 3000-3500 mile >intervals >and will continue to do so. > >I have heard that the high quality dino oils are "about" the same quality as >the synthetics >at this point. Strictly word of mouth, again no credible data either way. Depends on the engine. I had a Chrysler Laser that was famous for baking out residual oil and coking up the turbocharger if not very carefully treated. Synthetic oil seemed to prevent that problem; I got 480,000 miles on the original engine and turbocharger with no special cool-down treatment. The fact that the synthetic had a much higher breakdown temperature was a big deal. >IMO, if it is to your advantage to run very low viscosity oils, synthetics >may be your >best or only choice. Or if you need to operate with the same oil over an extremely wide temperature range, so you need a very wide viscosity range. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#70
|
|||
|
|||
Best no BS motor oil & filter comparisons?
"SMS" > wrote in message ... > Mark A wrote: >> "HiC" > wrote in message >> ... >>> I see I'm getting a lot of responses about filters which I >>> appreciate, >>> to clarify, I was asking about oil & filters >> >> If you want the best oil, get a full synthetic. I don't think >> anyone will argue that, but some people will say you are wasting >> your money (but I think you are wasting your money in most cases if >> you don't use synthetic). Some of the other companies are trying to >> compete against Mobil 1 more heavily, and you may be able to find >> some good deals in a full synthetic. > > The Mobil 1 sold in the U.S. is no longer a full synthetic. Redline > is still full synthetic, as is Amsoil. Castrol is not. Care to elaborate on the claim that Mobil 1 scold in the US is no longer a full synthetic. The follow claim comes from the Mobil 1 Web Site: "Is Mobil 1 with SuperSyn Technology a fully synthetic motor oil? "Yes, it is. To meet the demanding requirements of today's specifications (and our customers' expectations), Mobil 1 with SuperSyn uses high-performance fluids, including polyalphaolefins (PAOs), along with a proprietary system of additives. Each Mobil 1 with SuperSyn viscosity grade uses a unique combination of synthetic fluids and selected additives in order to tailor the viscosity grade to its specific application." And be careful when you say "Amsoil" is a full synthetic. Some Amsoil products are, some are not (the XL oils for instance). Ed |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Best no BS motor oil/filter comparison? | HiC | Technology | 306 | December 5th 08 04:47 PM |
Oil filter changing irritation and fuel filter question. | Some Dude | Ford Explorer | 4 | August 19th 06 01:04 AM |
86 accord/motor oil in air filter pan | alscubapal | Honda | 9 | January 2nd 06 07:53 PM |
Rigorous air filter comparison test | Daniel J. Stern | Driving | 52 | January 6th 05 10:40 AM |
Rigorous air filter comparison test | Daniel J. Stern | Technology | 28 | January 6th 05 10:40 AM |