If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Darus wrote:
> Is it just me or are the moderators at RSC even more restrictive than > ever? I think it's just you. I've been banned from RSC in the past for things I haven't even received a warning for recently. The one area they've become more restrictive of, is when a handful of the same people repeatedly start threads that rehash things that have previously resulted in 10 page flamefests. In those cases, the people involved have previously been told to knock it off, so it doesn't seem like a big deal. If I were given a warning for something I posted, rather than lashing out at the moderators, I'd re-examine my own behavior and if I felt the warning was unwarranted I would contact the moderators privately. I'm certain doing that would provide a positive result in all but the most extreme cases. |
Ads |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
"Jeff Reid" > wrote in news:tRtNe.88839$E95.29094
@fed1read01: > Maybe I should start a class action lawsuit to get them to > stop this behavior ... > > maybe you should grow up. RSC provides a huge benefit to the COMMUNITY. Your feelings got hurt. Toooooo Bad. RSC is owned and operated by somebody who is not you or me. They can do whatever the heck they want. If I find something that is incorrect, I challenge it. If I get warned, then fine. BFD. I think I've had a warning on there for a year or more. I don't even know what it is or what it's for. Who cares? If you can show ME that your lawsuit can benefit ME more than all the info and dloads provided FREE by RSC then go ahead, Start listing. Until such time that YOU can show just what amazing things you can contribute to the sim community, I'd strongly recomend you just shut up. I don't know what your beef with RSC is about, I don't care. I find it hugely amusing that you think you have rights on the internet. They are uploading kiddie porn, snuff films, terrorist communications, and on and on and on. And you feel you have a greivance worthy of a court's time? Good God man...did they post pictures of your mother and a goat? I rarely get this crude but I do so for your benefit. Hopefully it will get through to you. Come back when you have some hair down there. We'll wait the 5 or 6 years. dave henrie |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
> > Maybe I should start a class action lawsuit to get them to
> > stop this behavior ... > RSC provides a huge benefit to the COMMUNITY. > If you can show ME that your lawsuit can benefit ME more than all the > info and dloads provided FREE by RSC then go ahead, Start listing. Read my post ... I never stated that I might sue RSC for money or to shut them down. I stated that I might sue to stop them from attaching warning avatars on peoples posts. If they want to warn somebody, they should do it privately. What harm could there possibly be in getting a cease and desist order to stop them from attaching warning avatars to peoples posts? > They can do whatever the heck they want. Apparently not, they claim that they were shut down in the past because of a members post. Also, they can't violate laws, and they should abide by their own rules. > If I find something that is incorrect, I challenge it. Which is exactly what I did. > I don't know what your beef with RSC is about, I don't care. You cared enough to respond. It should be obviouse that my beef is that that RSC attaches warning avatars to peoples posts, and that quite often, the warnings are undeserved. In my case, the RSC moderators first ignored, then over-reacted to my private emails about receiving and public posting of warning. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
>> Nothing in the rules at RSC or the agreement when you join gives them
>> permission to publicly attach warning avatars to every post you make. > It's a private forum that you chose to participate in voluntarily. The > administrators and moderators of the site can run it however they see > fit, and if you don't like it you can either deal with them personally > or go somewhere else. Which is exactly what I did, I dealt with them peronally and went somewhere else. I can also deal with them publicly if I choose to do so. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
"Jeff Reid" > wrote in news:2nxNe.88862$E95.14850
@fed1read01: > You cared enough to respond. It should be obviouse that > my beef is that that RSC attaches warning avatars to peoples posts, > and that quite often, the warnings are undeserved. In my > case, the RSC moderators first ignored, then over-reacted to my > private emails about receiving and public posting of warning. > No I don't care. I can't imagine what could be so gosh darned important that your self-worth is impugned. I DO know that I myself and hundreds if not thousands of others get immense benefits from RSC. So they can be as rude as they like. I only know that your actions, for whatever reason you feel compelled to undertake, can only harm me. I'm not defending RSC, I'm not intellectually curious enough to even briefly examine the merits of either side. For pity's sake...it's a freekin' Race Sim site. It's not a publisher of scientific thesi. dave henrie |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
> I don't know what your beef with RSC is about
Note that I didn't start this thread, just added my opinion to it. I told RSC that I wouldn't agree to them attaching warning avatars to my posts, and told them I no longer was giving them permission to host my posts. They complied and deleted my posts. They also banned me (at least I got an email from Mbrio stating that they banned me). I'm no longer being "abused, harassed, defamed, and/or falsely accused" by RSC, so my personal dealings with them are over. However, it's apparent they still are doing the same thing to other people, which I think is wrong, so I'm just doing my part by adding to this thread. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
> I only know that your actions, for whatever reason you feel compelled
> to undertake, can only harm me. What actions are you referring to? All I've posted is that I don't approve of RSC attaching warning avatars to the posts on it's forum. How could this possible harm you? Again note, I didn't start this thread, merely added my experiences with RSC to it. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
"Jeff Reid" > wrote in news:tRtNe.88839$E95.29094
@fed1read01: > Maybe I should start a class action lawsuit to get them to > stop this behavior ... > > I was ignoring this thread til that line popped into view. dave henrie |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
>> Maybe I should start a class action lawsuit to get them to
>> stop this behavior ... > I was ignoring this thread til that line popped into view. I was being sarcastic here. Obviously a class action lawsuit would require building a list of plaintiffs. Do you see anyone posting here about wanting to join in? I think it's wrong for RSC to attach warning avatars on forum posts. If this behavior ever did result in legal action, it would be the fault of the RSC moderators who chose to do this, not the victims of their abuse, harassment, false accusations and/or defamatory content. > RSC contributing to the community It's not RSC, but the people who post there that do the contributing. When RSC went down before, a temporary one was created that served the community just as well. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Jeff Reid wrote:
> If this behavior ever did result in legal action Uh...what laws, in what country, are there against giving people warnings on an internet forum? I'd be impressed if people managed to successfully file a class-action lawsuit against a company that provides them a non-necessary service that they don't pay for. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|