If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
159 Opening Thoughts
There were a couple of 159s in our local showroom today so I had a
look. A 1.9JTS and a 2.4JTDm. I thought they looked much better in the metal than in the pictures I've seen. It's not as photogenic as the 156 was. The front of the car is much more 'in your face' than the 156 front. However, cleaning all the detail bits round the lights and grills looks like a power wash or toothbrush job (thanks a lot for that Geo!). The standard 17 inch wheels (toothbrushes required again) didn't seem to fit as snuggly in the wheel arches as I was expecting and the cars both looked high off the ground especially at the back. The door handles do feel nice but they are a bit ordinary really. Where the 156 said 'I want to be different' this car is much more about being similar. I suppose the exception is the front end but, to be honest, the relative dullness of the rest of the car makes you gasp when you walk round and get to the extrovert front. It just seems a little unbalanced to me. Inside, there was some odd positioning of switchgear - the fog light switches have moved to where the fuse box cover is on the 156 but they looked a bit out of the way on the underside slope of the dash. Other than that, the inside will not seem unfamiliar to 156 owners. This also includes a dire lack of space in the back if the front passengers are tall. The front seats on one of the show cars were sufficiently far back that I could not envisage someone actually getting their feet and legs in the back foot wells. As usual, there's a shortage of leather on the doors so anyone not going for black leather will have little patches of coloured leather on their doors. Looking at the options list (something that's grown out of all proportion since the 156), the external colours are disappointingly dreary with little choice (Alfa Red and a light silver seemed the only viable bright colours). Several options (like a sunroof) are not available at launch. So what's my gut feeling - I'm really under whelmed actually! I came away thinking it was far too much like a face lifted 156 and not a new car. There's also some info now filtering out on the net hinting that Alfa may be at it again with the hyperbole (no it wasn't the centre of attention at a certain car show) and, yes, it appears that the suspension settings on the 2.2JTS are too under damped for UK roads. However, Alfa do learn SOME things and all the petrol engines now come with the reassurance of chain driven cams! Yippee. From the specs, the 2.4JTDm appears to be carrying a VERY similar mechanical specification (brakes etc) to the 3.2JTS. The word on the street is that the 2.4JTDm is the one to buy - the 3.2 is held back by its weight (it now has 4WD ), the 2.2JTS by suspect suspension. The 1.9JTDm is also a contender. The equivalent car to mine is now 10,000UKP more than mine was so..er..I think I'll wait and let someone else get punched in the face with the early years Alfa depreciation. What a disappointment really... -- Z Scotland Alfa Romeo 156 2.4JTD Veloce Leather 'Oil' be seeing you.. (Email without 'Alfa' in subject are auto-deleted..sorry!) |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
159 Opening Thoughts
Zathras wrote:
> There were a couple of 159s in our local showroom today so I had a > look. A 1.9JTS and a 2.4JTDm. I thought they looked much better in the > metal than in the pictures I've seen. I test drove a 1.9JTDm last week. Owning a 2.5 V6 156 it was the wrong engine to impress me, I was hoping to try the 2.4JTDm. Without wishing to upset 1.9JTD owners I find that engine a bit too ordinary even though it performs well enough. My lasting memories? The console is much more imposing - it still contains the guages which I like but is much larger and even more angled towards the driver, containing the fashionable large buttons. All ergonomically good but lacks some of the style of the 156 IMHO. Gone are the chrome air con controls on the face lifted 156 interior of 2002 which is a shame. The stalks contain more controls and are rectangular rather than rounded and the steering wheel contains a much larger boss. Gone are the deep cowled instruments with much shallower affairs. The dash is a more integral unit with speedo, rev counter and computer display, I would have preferred a more distinctive style like the 156. One of the most noticeable differences from the 156 are the huge squarish door mirrors. The 156 mirrors were very stylish, these look functional but not Alfa Other than that I felt externally it looked pretty good with its wide arches, though the rear lights looked a little too Japanese for my tastes. Although larger it didn't have that bloated look of the latest 3 series BMW. Driving it is certainly more supple than the Veloce 156, a TI pack will follow with lowered stiffer suspension. My 156 felt more sporty at the expense of a harsher ride. The 159 felt a better family car. My overriding opinion was this was a car designed to take on the German and Japanese models at some expense to the Alfisti. The dash immediately in front of the driver is less distinctive than the 156/147/GT and is not dissimilar to the new Passat. The heater controls could have come off a Mazda 6 and the rear lights are a hybrid between the old 156 and an Accord. Fortunately the steering wheel control remain fairly subtle compared with other makes. The 159 is the first Alfa produced under new Chief Exec Karl-Heinz Kalbfell, a former director at BMW. On the basis he said of Alfa "you cant find financially-minded people in this company it's full of engineers, who all want to launch new cars and dont want to deal with the boring bits in between. Perhaps Alfa has a little too much spirit for non-Alfisti, in its appearance, driving style and temperament." maybe it is not surprising the 159 feels a little less Italian than its predecessor? Having said that the 2.4JTDm is one hell of a spec - 200bhp and 400nm with the distinctive 5 cylinder engine sound. Plus the Q4 makes for an interesting option (standard on the 3.2 petrol now and an option on the 2.4 diesel later in the year), the salesman raved about his drive of the 3.2 Q4 on the test track in Milan (Perry McCarthy - the original stig - was there - he wrote off a Brera!). My conclusion was similar to Zathras, no rush to trade in my 156, but I'll reserve judgement until I drive the 2.4JTDm or 3.2 Q4 Cheers Tony |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
159 Opening Thoughts
Zathras wrote:
> Inside, there was some odd positioning of switchgear - I agree. Did you clock the remote boot release?: It is a tiny switch in a bank of switches above the rear view mirror - most of them controlling the interior lighting. I can see it now: fumbling in the dark to turn on the interior lights only to hear boot ping open and a trip to the rear to close the thing.... again and again. > > What a disappointment really... Yes and No. Yes - front apart it is externally far too ordinary: the ******* offspring of a marriage between a 156 and a generic Beemer. But we forget in complaining just how extraordinarily beautiful and aesthetically balanced the 156 was... and is. Only familiarity has dulled our appreciation. It was always unlikely that Alfa could out-156 the aesthetics with the replacement. No - tremendous seats. I have never found it so easy to become quickly comfortable in a drivers seat. The promise of a better ride (not had the test drive yet). Boring stuff: a usefully large boot. Feels very solid. 5-star NACAP crash results. All very good day to day stuff, but adding to the sense of something German lurking in the genes.... Like Tony, nothing to make me rush to dropping the 156. Not sure the greater utility and comfort will ever be enough to outweight the joy I still feel everytime I see my nuvola 156. People still look and comment on it even after over five years and three quarters of a million 156s on Europe's roads. I don't think a 159 would turn heads in the same way in any colour: and, yes, where is the iridiescent option??? OTOH, no more 36K cambelt swaps, no more disintegrating wishbones/bushes, a ride that leaves my fillings in place over the broken stuff (? - so I'm told)...... like I said, Yes and No. But take away the flaws in a car and generally for some reason the character seeps away with the gremlins... |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
159 Opening Thoughts
On Fri, 24 Feb 2006 21:33:18 GMT, Zathras
> wrote: >There were a couple of 159s in our local showroom today so I had a >look. A 1.9JTS and a 2.4JTDm. I thought they looked much better in the >metal than in the pictures I've seen. Agreed. >The door handles do feel nice but they are a bit ordinary really. >Where the 156 said 'I want to be different' this car is much more >about being similar. I suppose the exception is the front end but, to >be honest, the relative dullness of the rest of the car makes you gasp >when you walk round and get to the extrovert front. It just seems a >little unbalanced to me. Question of taste of course. I think it looks very good, though I agree the back doesn't quite match up to the front. >Looking at the options list (something that's grown out of all >proportion since the 156), the external colours are disappointingly >dreary with little choice (Alfa Red and a light silver seemed the only >viable bright colours). I really agree with you on this one. The entire car-owning world (well, at least on the evidence of the roads in the Netherlands) seems to be competing to be as boring as possible as far as colours are concerned. Most large and medium cars, and quite a lot of small ones, seem to be in one of the colours Pale Fog Grey, Dark Mud Grey, Boring Blackish-Blue or Hearse Black. And now even Alfa seems to be going the same way. Quite bizarre. Still - at least it's getting easier and easier to find my car in a large car-park. -- Stephen Poley |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
159 Opening Thoughts
On Sat, 25 Feb 2006 06:50:06 +0000, Barry Bingham
> wrote: >Zathras wrote: > >> Inside, there was some odd positioning of switchgear - > >I agree. Did you clock the remote boot release? Missed that one! >: It is a tiny switch in >a bank of switches above the rear view mirror - most of them controlling >the interior lighting. I can see it now: fumbling in the dark to turn on >the interior lights only to hear boot ping open and a trip to the rear >to close the thing.... again and again. FFS! >> >> What a disappointment really... > >Yes and No. > >Yes - front apart it is externally far too ordinary: the ******* >offspring of a marriage between a 156 and a generic Beemer. But we >forget in complaining just how extraordinarily beautiful and >aesthetically balanced the 156 was... and is. I don't. > Only familiarity has dulled our appreciation. Perhaps. But then you park next to some other new pose-mobile and you see it still holds its own. >It was always unlikely that Alfa could out-156 >the aesthetics with the replacement. I always said that from the moment I got my 156. I wonder if Pininfarina might have made a better job. For me Guigaro blows too hot and cold. And STILL you get the tacky boast sticker on the front wing!!! >No - tremendous seats. I have never found it so easy to become quickly >comfortable in a drivers seat. The promise Don't lose sight of reality - these are *ALFA promises*! >of a better ride (not had the test drive yet). That'll be interesting if you get the 'dodgy' 2.2JTS to try. >Boring stuff: a usefully large boot. Feels very solid. >5-star NACAP crash results. All very good day to day stuff, but adding >to the sense of something German lurking in the genes.... > >Like Tony, nothing to make me rush to dropping the 156. Not sure the >greater utility and comfort will ever be enough to outweight the joy I >still feel everytime I see my nuvola 156. People still look and comment >on it even after over five years and three quarters of a million 156s on >Europe's roads. I don't think a 159 would turn heads in the same way in >any colour: and, yes, where is the iridiescent option??? > >OTOH, no more 36K cambelt swaps, no more disintegrating >wishbones/bushes, a ride that leaves my fillings in place over the >broken stuff (? - so I'm told)...... like I said, Yes and No. But take >away the flaws in a car and generally for some reason the character >seeps away with the gremlins... er..ask anyone with a petrol cambelt failure if they'd rather have the 'character'. 'Cr@p' and 'character' shouldn't be mistaken, but often are, for the same thing. As for the bushes..we shall see.... -- Z Scotland Alfa Romeo 156 2.4JTD Veloce Leather 'Oil' be seeing you.. (Email without 'Alfa' in subject are auto-deleted..sorry!) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
'84 Toyota Cressida: Runs Fine, But Every Dash Warning Light Is Lit. Thoughts On ? | Robert11 | Technology | 0 | January 2nd 05 07:29 PM |
Thoughts on A6 engine choices | Mike Buckley | Audi | 2 | November 24th 04 07:18 AM |
Ordered my 2005 E60... further thoughts on active steering and ARS? | david olson | BMW | 10 | October 10th 04 07:57 PM |
My GT test drive thoughts | PhilipS | Alfa Romeo | 18 | August 15th 04 11:38 PM |
Any thoughts on the new "disappearing" seats?/Transmissions | NthDegree | Dodge | 3 | May 12th 04 04:00 PM |