Stupid Americans! -- Stupid... Stupid... STUPID!!! ___________mixqec

On Tue, 9 Nov 2004, Wound Up wrote:

> No one deserves to be the target of blind, ideological, prejudicial
> hate.

....unless they're, y'know, gay and living in the YSM (Yoonaad'd States of
Mairca).

DS

Daniel J. Stern wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Nov 2004, Wound Up wrote:
>
>
>>No one deserves to be the target of blind, ideological, prejudicial
>>hate.
>
>
> ...unless they're, y'know, gay and living in the YSM (Yoonaad'd States of
> Mairca).

Homosexuality does not serve as an acceptable excuse for being the
target of hatred

>
> DS

On Tue, 9 Nov 2004, Wound Up wrote:

>>> No one deserves to be the target of blind, ideological, prejudicial
>>> hate.

> > ...unless they're, y'know, gay and living in the YSM (Yoonaad'd States
> > of Mairca).

> Homosexuality does not serve as an acceptable excuse for being the
> target of hatred

Are ya sure? A lot of voters seem to hold the opposite view.

The fellow who started this thread also posted it on the rec.autos.vw
newsgroup, to which I subscribe because my wife drives a New Beetle. He (or
she) posted it at the same time it was posted on this newsgroup, and there
have been no replies.

I wonder why? Are Ford owners more politically opinionated than Volkswagen
drivers? I remember all the hippies who used to (some still do) drive VW
microbuses. They had some interesting politics, which they could eloquently
describe when they weren't high. Ah, those were the days....


"Daniel J. Stern" > wrote in message
n.umich.edu...
> On Tue, 9 Nov 2004, Wound Up wrote:
>
>>>> No one deserves to be the target of blind, ideological, prejudicial
>>>> hate.
>
>> > ...unless they're, y'know, gay and living in the YSM (Yoonaad'd States
>> > of Mairca).
>
>> Homosexuality does not serve as an acceptable excuse for being the
>> target of hatred
>
> Are ya sure? A lot of voters seem to hold the opposite view.

Maybe it's because you're making simplistic, broad-brushed attributions
based on half-assed conjecture instead of anything substantial. Or
maybe you're right, those who drive "peopleskars" are just more erudite,
intelligent, and naturally more tolerant of humanity.

Those "people", by the way, didn't include gays. Or blacks, Jews,
gypsys, etc. etc. They were to be gassed, burned or shot. Those
"people" included nazis, their subjects, and their sympathizers, only.

So what's your point again? You smoked too much pot back in the day to
make any sense now?

Kevin DeAngelis wrote:
> The fellow who started this thread also posted it on the rec.autos.vw
> newsgroup, to which I subscribe because my wife drives a New Beetle. He (or
> she) posted it at the same time it was posted on this newsgroup, and there
> have been no replies.
>
> I wonder why? Are Ford owners more politically opinionated than Volkswagen
> drivers? I remember all the hippies who used to (some still do) drive VW
> microbuses. They had some interesting politics, which they could eloquently
> describe when they weren't high. Ah, those were the days....
>
>
> "Daniel J. Stern" > wrote in message
> n.umich.edu...
>
>>On Tue, 9 Nov 2004, Wound Up wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>>No one deserves to be the target of blind, ideological, prejudicial
>>>>>hate.
>>>>
>>>>...unless they're, y'know, gay and living in the YSM (Yoonaad'd States
>>>>of Mairca).
>>>
>>>Homosexuality does not serve as an acceptable excuse for being the
>>>target of hatred
>>
>>Are ya sure? A lot of voters seem to hold the opposite view.
>
>
>

Well, you have the right handle, I'll say that! Some folks could sure stand
to smoke a little of the wacky tabacky....


"Wound Up" > wrote in message
...
> Maybe it's because you're making simplistic, broad-brushed attributions
> based on half-assed conjecture instead of anything substantial. Or maybe
> you're right, those who drive "peopleskars" are just more erudite,
> intelligent, and naturally more tolerant of humanity.
>
> Those "people", by the way, didn't include gays. Or blacks, Jews, gypsys,
> etc. etc. They were to be gassed, burned or shot. Those "people"
> included nazis, their subjects, and their sympathizers, only.
>
> So what's your point again? You smoked too much pot back in the day to
> make any sense now?
>
> Kevin DeAngelis wrote:
>> The fellow who started this thread also posted it on the rec.autos.vw
>> newsgroup, to which I subscribe because my wife drives a New Beetle. He
>> (or she) posted it at the same time it was posted on this newsgroup, and
>> there have been no replies.
>>
>> I wonder why? Are Ford owners more politically opinionated than
>> Volkswagen drivers? I remember all the hippies who used to (some still
>> do) drive VW microbuses. They had some interesting politics, which they
>> could eloquently describe when they weren't high. Ah, those were the
>> days....
>>
>>
>> "Daniel J. Stern" > wrote in message
>> n.umich.edu...
>>
>>>On Tue, 9 Nov 2004, Wound Up wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>>>No one deserves to be the target of blind, ideological, prejudicial
>>>>>>hate.
>>>>>
>>>>>...unless they're, y'know, gay and living in the YSM (Yoonaad'd States
>>>>>of Mairca).
>>>>
>>>>Homosexuality does not serve as an acceptable excuse for being the
>>>>target of hatred
>>>
>>>Are ya sure? A lot of voters seem to hold the opposite view.
>>
>>
>>
>

Actually, many of them waxed poetic far better when they were high....
LOL

On Tue, 09 Nov 2004 03:10:25 GMT, "Kevin DeAngelis"
> wrote:

>The fellow who started this thread also posted it on the rec.autos.vw
>newsgroup, to which I subscribe because my wife drives a New Beetle. He (or
>she) posted it at the same time it was posted on this newsgroup, and there
>have been no replies.
>
>I wonder why? Are Ford owners more politically opinionated than Volkswagen
>drivers? I remember all the hippies who used to (some still do) drive VW
>microbuses. They had some interesting politics, which they could eloquently
>describe when they weren't high. Ah, those were the days....
>
>
>"Daniel J. Stern" > wrote in message
in.umich.edu...
>> On Tue, 9 Nov 2004, Wound Up wrote:
>>
>>>>> No one deserves to be the target of blind, ideological, prejudicial
>>>>> hate.
>>
>>> > ...unless they're, y'know, gay and living in the YSM (Yoonaad'd States
>>> > of Mairca).
>>
>>> Homosexuality does not serve as an acceptable excuse for being the
>>> target of hatred
>>
>> Are ya sure? A lot of voters seem to hold the opposite view.
>

Entering into the unknown, V'ger seeks information
used to maintain his Vintage Burgundy 1965 Ford
Mustang 2+2 w/289 ci 4v oem A Code V8, C4 Trans,
16x8" Vintage 40 wheels, with BF Goodrich gForce
T/A 225/50ZR16 tires, American Racing "Mustang"
Centercaps, and a whole lot of other stuff; )

Daniel J. Stern wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Nov 2004, Wound Up wrote:
>
>
>>>>No one deserves to be the target of blind, ideological, prejudicial
>>>>hate.
>>>
>
>>>...unless they're, y'know, gay and living in the YSM (Yoonaad'd States
>>>of Mairca).
>>
>
>>Homosexuality does not serve as an acceptable excuse for being the
>>target of hatred
>
>
> Are ya sure? A lot of voters seem to hold the opposite view.

I'm quite sure. However, most don't like activists on either end.

Daniel J. Stern wrote:

> On Tue, 9 Nov 2004, Wound Up wrote:
>
>
>>>>No one deserves to be the target of blind, ideological, prejudicial
>>>>hate.
>
>
>>>...unless they're, y'know, gay and living in the YSM (Yoonaad'd States
>>>of Mairca).
>
>
>>Homosexuality does not serve as an acceptable excuse for being the
>>target of hatred
>
>
> Are ya sure? A lot of voters seem to hold the opposite view.

Well, let's be fair. There's lots of reasons to hate someone, like if
they're not white, not Christian, or any number of other reasons. Hate:
it's not just for fags anymore.

nate

--
replace "fly" with "com" to reply.
http://home.comcast.net/~njnagel

Daniel J. Stern wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Nov 2004, Wound Up wrote:
>
>
>>>>No one deserves to be the target of blind, ideological, prejudicial
>>>>hate.
>
>
>>>...unless they're, y'know, gay and living in the YSM (Yoonaad'd States
>>>of Mairca).
>
>
>>Homosexuality does not serve as an acceptable excuse for being the
>>target of hatred
>
>
> Are ya sure? A lot of voters seem to hold the opposite view.

What is the evidence of this?

Matt