If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Is the Chevy Volt Our Energy Salvation?
I am thinking about the launch of the Chevy Volt sometime on or about
year 2010. This is an electric car with an internal engine that is designed to run only when the battery becomes discharged enough to need it. Otherwise, the car is supposed to run 40 'city' miles on a charge that requires 6.5 hours to accomplish. Now, how many people can get by with <40 miles of driving a day? I think a whale of a lot of them. With an overnight charge, a huge number of people could get where they need to go, and back again, without burning a drop of gasoline/diesel/ethanol/whatever. The energy could be transferred to sources that the USA has plenty of within its borders - coal, nuclear, wind, and maybe eventually solar, geothermal, etc. Not only does this seem to me to be a great breakthru, but it should make economic sense as well. The price of electricity to go the same distance as the gasoline required to do it is said to be one quarter as much. For those who don't hit the road for long distances very much, not buying a drop of gasoline all year would be a significant savings, especially if they can buy this car for 100% of their needs. The car should have an unusually high resale value as there are fewer moving parts that are easier to repair (electric motors are dead- simple in this respect) and by the time the car expends its battery, battery technology _should_ be such that a replacement battery will be even cheaper than it will be upon initial release of the car. So, is the Chevy Volt the beginning of the end of the oil problem, the refining capacity problem, and other oil-related problems? Dave Head |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Is the Chevy Volt Our Energy Salvation?
"Dave Head" > wrote in message
s.com... >I am thinking about the launch of the Chevy Volt sometime on or about > year 2010. This is an electric car with an internal engine that is > designed to run only when the battery becomes discharged enough to > need it. Otherwise, the car is supposed to run 40 'city' miles on a > charge that requires 6.5 hours to accomplish. > > Now, how many people can get by with <40 miles of driving a day? I > think a whale of a lot of them. With an overnight charge, a huge > number of people could get where they need to go, and back again, > without burning a drop of gasoline/diesel/ethanol/whatever. The > energy could be transferred to sources that the USA has plenty of > within its borders - coal, nuclear, wind, and maybe eventually solar, > geothermal, etc. > > Not only does this seem to me to be a great breakthru, but it should > make economic sense as well. The price of electricity to go the same > distance as the gasoline required to do it is said to be one quarter > as much. For those who don't hit the road for long distances very > much, not buying a drop of gasoline all year would be a significant > savings, especially if they can buy this car for 100% of their needs. > The car should have an unusually high resale value as there are fewer > moving parts that are easier to repair (electric motors are dead- > simple in this respect) and by the time the car expends its battery, > battery technology _should_ be such that a replacement battery will be > even cheaper than it will be upon initial release of the car. > > So, is the Chevy Volt the beginning of the end of the oil problem, the > refining capacity problem, and other oil-related problems? > > Dave Head > Yeah right, how soon the fergit the GM's EV1! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Who_Kil...lectric_Car%3F Keep kiddin' yourself, DanlK www.collectibles.fyis.org RSS Feed Subscription @ http://tinyurl.com/38qpt9 |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Is the Chevy Volt Our Energy Salvation?
Dave Head > wrote in
s.com: > I am thinking about the launch of the Chevy Volt sometime on or about > year 2010. This is an electric car with an internal engine that is > designed to run only when the battery becomes discharged enough to > need it. Otherwise, the car is supposed to run 40 'city' miles on a > charge that requires 6.5 hours to accomplish. > > Now, how many people can get by with <40 miles of driving a day? I > think a whale of a lot of them. With an overnight charge, a huge > number of people could get where they need to go, and back again, > without burning a drop of gasoline/diesel/ethanol/whatever. The > energy could be transferred to sources that the USA has plenty of > within its borders - coal, nuclear, wind, and maybe eventually solar, > geothermal, etc. > > Not only does this seem to me to be a great breakthru, but it should > make economic sense as well. The price of electricity to go the same > distance as the gasoline required to do it is said to be one quarter > as much. For those who don't hit the road for long distances very > much, not buying a drop of gasoline all year would be a significant > savings, especially if they can buy this car for 100% of their needs. > The car should have an unusually high resale value as there are fewer > moving parts that are easier to repair (electric motors are dead- > simple in this respect) you still have a gasoline engine that needs service and repair,PLUS the electrics(including the generator). > and by the time the car expends its battery, > battery technology _should_ be such that a replacement battery will be > even cheaper than it will be upon initial release of the car. > > So, is the Chevy Volt the beginning of the end of the oil problem, the > refining capacity problem, and other oil-related problems? > > Dave Head > > If you can recharge from an electric outlet in 6.5 hrs,you could plug it in while AT work,and double your range. Will the Volt have airconditioning and rearwindow defrosters? -- Jim Yanik jyanik at kua.net |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Is the Chevy Volt Our Energy Salvation?
Dave Head wrote:
> I am thinking about the launch of the Chevy Volt sometime on or about > year 2010. This is an electric car with an internal engine that is > designed to run only when the battery becomes discharged enough to > need it. Otherwise, the car is supposed to run 40 'city' miles on a > charge that requires 6.5 hours to accomplish. > > Now, how many people can get by with <40 miles of driving a day? I > think a whale of a lot of them. With an overnight charge, a huge > number of people could get where they need to go, and back again, > without burning a drop of gasoline/diesel/ethanol/whatever. The > energy could be transferred to sources that the USA has plenty of > within its borders - coal, nuclear, wind, and maybe eventually solar, > geothermal, etc. > > Not only does this seem to me to be a great breakthru, but it should > make economic sense as well. The price of electricity to go the same > distance as the gasoline required to do it is said to be one quarter > as much. For those who don't hit the road for long distances very > much, not buying a drop of gasoline all year would be a significant > savings, especially if they can buy this car for 100% of their needs. > The car should have an unusually high resale value as there are fewer > moving parts that are easier to repair (electric motors are dead- > simple in this respect) and by the time the car expends its battery, > battery technology _should_ be such that a replacement battery will be > even cheaper than it will be upon initial release of the car. > > So, is the Chevy Volt the beginning of the end of the oil problem, the > refining capacity problem, and other oil-related problems? > > Dave Head > HAHAHA. Another stupid expensive technological solution. The answer to the oil problem is smaller cars and lower speeds. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Is the Chevy Volt Our Energy Salvation?
Dave,
Only if the electricity to charge it is generated by other than fossil fuels. Otherwise, it just promotes electricity generation and distribution infrastructure, and pumps as much carbon oxides into the air as gasoline would have. Physics rulez. Energy cannot be created or destroyed, only changed in form. If hydrocarbons must burn to power the vehicle, what does it matter _where_ they are burned? The results still wind-up in the same atmosphere. Allan -- One asks, many answer, all learn - Plato, on the 'Forum -- True civility is when every one gives to every other one every right that they claim for themselves. "Dave Head" > wrote in message s.com... >I am thinking about the launch of the Chevy Volt sometime on or about > year 2010. This is an electric car with an internal engine that is > designed to run only when the battery becomes discharged enough to > need it. Otherwise, the car is supposed to run 40 'city' miles on a > charge that requires 6.5 hours to accomplish. > > Now, how many people can get by with <40 miles of driving a day? I > think a whale of a lot of them. With an overnight charge, a huge > number of people could get where they need to go, and back again, > without burning a drop of gasoline/diesel/ethanol/whatever. The > energy could be transferred to sources that the USA has plenty of > within its borders - coal, nuclear, wind, and maybe eventually solar, > geothermal, etc. > > Not only does this seem to me to be a great breakthru, but it should > make economic sense as well. The price of electricity to go the same > distance as the gasoline required to do it is said to be one quarter > as much. For those who don't hit the road for long distances very > much, not buying a drop of gasoline all year would be a significant > savings, especially if they can buy this car for 100% of their needs. > The car should have an unusually high resale value as there are fewer > moving parts that are easier to repair (electric motors are dead- > simple in this respect) and by the time the car expends its battery, > battery technology _should_ be such that a replacement battery will be > even cheaper than it will be upon initial release of the car. > > So, is the Chevy Volt the beginning of the end of the oil problem, the > refining capacity problem, and other oil-related problems? > > Dave Head > |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Is the Chevy Volt Our Energy Salvation?
On 23 May 2007 15:12:02 GMT, Jim Yanik > wrote:
>Dave Head > wrote in ps.com: > >> I am thinking about the launch of the Chevy Volt sometime on or about >> year 2010. This is an electric car with an internal engine that is >> designed to run only when the battery becomes discharged enough to >> need it. Otherwise, the car is supposed to run 40 'city' miles on a >> charge that requires 6.5 hours to accomplish. >> >> Now, how many people can get by with <40 miles of driving a day? I >> think a whale of a lot of them. With an overnight charge, a huge >> number of people could get where they need to go, and back again, >> without burning a drop of gasoline/diesel/ethanol/whatever. The >> energy could be transferred to sources that the USA has plenty of >> within its borders - coal, nuclear, wind, and maybe eventually solar, >> geothermal, etc. >> >> Not only does this seem to me to be a great breakthru, but it should >> make economic sense as well. The price of electricity to go the same >> distance as the gasoline required to do it is said to be one quarter >> as much. For those who don't hit the road for long distances very >> much, not buying a drop of gasoline all year would be a significant >> savings, especially if they can buy this car for 100% of their needs. >> The car should have an unusually high resale value as there are fewer >> moving parts that are easier to repair (electric motors are dead- >> simple in this respect) > >you still have a gasoline engine that needs service and repair,PLUS the >electrics(including the generator). When's the last time you actually had an _engine_ repair? Probably the most reliable piece in the car. And... it could be a diesel. Even more reliable. Electrics are pretty reliable, too. Hardly anything ever goes wrong with a motor. Bearings. Replace 'em yourself, easily. More likely for the control electronics to go south, but this is true for engine computers too. Meanwhile, there's that 1 to 4 ratio of the cost of electricity and the cost of gasoline, with gasoline much more likely to get more expensive than electricity is. >> and by the time the car expends its battery, >> battery technology _should_ be such that a replacement battery will be >> even cheaper than it will be upon initial release of the car. >> >> So, is the Chevy Volt the beginning of the end of the oil problem, the >> refining capacity problem, and other oil-related problems? >> >> Dave Head >> >> > >If you can recharge from an electric outlet in 6.5 hrs,you could plug it in >while AT work,and double your range. Exactly, if you can get your company to agree to that. They'd probably do so, and would likely get incentives from the government to do so when there's a certain density of electric vehicles on the road. OTOH, a lot of people will be less than 20 miles from work, and not need to do that. I would guess that daytime electricity will become more expensive than nighttime electricity when the power grid has to start supplying electric for both air conditioners _and_ battery charging. The thing that makes electric cars viable immediately is the fact that the electric grid is only near overload during the day, with very much excess capacity when the sun goes down and we don't need the power hungry air conditioner. >Will the Volt have airconditioning and rearwindow defrosters? I don't know those particulars, but I'm betting it'll fail if it doesn't - people want at least air conditioning. RW defrosting too is nice, but prolly not a reason not to buy it. Dave Head You have all the rights that you're willing to fight for. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Is the Chevy Volt Our Energy Salvation?
On Wed, 23 May 2007 22:46:16 -0400, "Allan Smith" >
wrote: >Dave, > >Only if the electricity to charge it is generated by other than fossil >fuels. Otherwise, it just promotes electricity generation and distribution >infrastructure, and pumps as much carbon oxides into the air as gasoline >would have. > >Physics rulez. Energy cannot be created or destroyed, only changed in form. > >If hydrocarbons must burn to power the vehicle, what does it matter _where_ >they are burned? The results still wind-up in the same atmosphere. > >Allan Well, I'm for nuclear power, but even if it comes from coal, part of the equation that is beneficial for us is to _not_ be importing our energy. We have plenty of coal. So, at least _part_ of the equation is satisfied even when coal is the source of power. But agree that something else, such as nuclear or wind (or solar or geothermal or biofuels when they become practical on a large scale) would be better. Dave Head You have all the rights that you're willing to fight for. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Is the Chevy Volt Our Energy Salvation?
> Meanwhile, there's that 1 to 4 ratio of the cost of electricity and the cost of > gasoline, with gasoline much more likely to get more expensive than electricity > is. Until everyone starts plugging in their cars, that is! Everyone always looks at the price of the alternate energy as the price is now, without demand from 100 million vehicles. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Is the Chevy Volt Our Energy Salvation?
Dave Head > wrote in
: > On 23 May 2007 15:12:02 GMT, Jim Yanik > wrote: > >>Dave Head > wrote in ups.com: >> >>> I am thinking about the launch of the Chevy Volt sometime on or >>> about year 2010. This is an electric car with an internal engine >>> that is designed to run only when the battery becomes discharged >>> enough to need it. Otherwise, the car is supposed to run 40 'city' >>> miles on a charge that requires 6.5 hours to accomplish. >>> >>> Now, how many people can get by with <40 miles of driving a day? I >>> think a whale of a lot of them. With an overnight charge, a huge >>> number of people could get where they need to go, and back again, >>> without burning a drop of gasoline/diesel/ethanol/whatever. The >>> energy could be transferred to sources that the USA has plenty of >>> within its borders - coal, nuclear, wind, and maybe eventually >>> solar, geothermal, etc. >>> >>> Not only does this seem to me to be a great breakthru, but it should >>> make economic sense as well. The price of electricity to go the >>> same distance as the gasoline required to do it is said to be one >>> quarter as much. For those who don't hit the road for long >>> distances very much, not buying a drop of gasoline all year would be >>> a significant savings, especially if they can buy this car for 100% >>> of their needs. The car should have an unusually high resale value >>> as there are fewer moving parts that are easier to repair (electric >>> motors are dead- simple in this respect) >> >>you still have a gasoline engine that needs service and repair,PLUS >>the electrics(including the generator). > > When's the last time you actually had an _engine_ repair? Probably > the most reliable piece in the car. And... it could be a diesel. Even > more reliable. My 79 Accord needed a new camshaft,it wiped a lobe. Damn Honda didn't comp any of the repair,either.Hondas are pretty reliable.Can't say that for "American" autos,though.Then,I consider the motor drivetrain,ignition and cooling part of "repair",too.starter,clutch,hoses.... > > Electrics are pretty reliable, too. Hardly anything ever goes wrong > with a motor. Bearings. and brushes or contacts. DC motors need brushes,AC motors may not,but do need an inverter to provide the AC from the DC battery. -- Jim Yanik jyanik at kua.net |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Is the Chevy Volt Our Energy Salvation?
Larry Bud > wrote in
ups.com: > >> Meanwhile, there's that 1 to 4 ratio of the cost of electricity and >> the cost of gasoline, with gasoline much more likely to get more >> expensive than electricity is. > > Until everyone starts plugging in their cars, that is! > > Everyone always looks at the price of the alternate energy as the > price is now, without demand from 100 million vehicles. > > > I note my electic bill mentions a higher electric rate for consumption over a certain # of KWHrs. I read yesterday that the Browns Ferry nuclear plant restarted one of their nuke plants,after a 30 yr shutdown. Good news. -- Jim Yanik jyanik at kua.net |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Conversion 6 volt to 12 Volt for backup engine | Mel P. | VW air cooled | 9 | March 14th 09 02:30 AM |
Cigarette lighter socket capacity? 12 volt to 120 volt AC converters | terry | Antique cars | 2 | January 15th 07 08:48 AM |
Conserve Energy | robs440 | Dodge | 6 | May 11th 06 03:21 AM |
6 volt vs 8 volt battery | Brother Pat | VW air cooled | 13 | October 5th 05 06:32 PM |
12 volt flasher in 6 volt system | Masospaghetti | Technology | 12 | June 9th 05 02:02 PM |