A Cars forum. AutoBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AutoBanter forum » Auto makers » Alfa Romeo
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

156 restyle: Last chance to buy a new future classic?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old May 19th 04, 11:06 AM
Tom Boltwood
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



> From: (AlexUK)
> Organization: ntl Cablemodem News Service
> Newsgroups: alt.autos.alfa-romeo
> Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 20:19:55 GMT
> Subject: 156 restyle: Last chance to buy a new future classic?
>
> As for the 166, I think it has lost all its finesse. Looks overweight
> now. I had one of these for a year and it never ceased to amaze me how
> gracefull it looked, be it stationary or moving (very quickly in
> Germany, :-) ).


I must disagree, I love the new 166, I think it is now the car it was always
meant to be. The front was never quite right for me before.

Ads
  #12  
Old May 24th 04, 06:06 AM
rp.addicott
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

SPOT ON they are going to bring in the 158 next year so why spoil the 156?
but hey Have u seen the S2000 Touring car take a look
http://www.eurostc.com/2k4/Default.a...page=press%2Fg
allery%2Finclude%5FGalleryV3Details%2Easp&nome=val encia&id=9# hell it looks
good with the new nose sell one like that n I'm buying
"Barry Bingham" > wrote in message
...
> Saw a copy of "Practical Classic Car" or some such in WHSmugs yesterday
> & they were listing cars made in the last five years most likely to
> become classics in x years time.
>
> 156 was top of the list, with a prediction that it would be the earlier
> pre-facelift cars with original nose, interesting metallics and wood
> steering wheels which would be most sought after. As owner of a 2000 in
> Nuvola this underlined why I have kept this car for four years and have
> decided (for the first time in thirty years of car buying) that I shall
> keep a car until it is at least five years old.
>
> Which brings me to Giugiario's nose job. Most of the coverage has been
> favourable, probably because the full depth 147-u-like grill is, in
> isolation an object of drama: indeed it is easily the best thing
> (aesthetically) about a 147. But, while the restyle still leaves the 156
> a lovely car, I can't help but feel that the innate "rightness" and
> intense beauty of the da Silva original has been compromised.
>
> This even applies to the mild tweaking of the rear: the light units now
> turn down instead of up. In so doing they subtly (&, OK, very slightly)
> alter the previous relationship to the curves in the rest of the body.
> This is change for change's sake. But the nose??? This is I fear a
> significant dilution of the car's beauty.
>
> One of the most extraordinary characteristics of my 156 has been its
> ability to elicit praise from non-car people, especially women, who find
> the car (and of course the colour) beautiful. Massively entertaining to
> see the 4 year old 156 get far more attention from the girls than the
> nearly new £25K+ Audi TT bought by a male colleague for the express
> purpose of attracting the girls... I have shown two of these women
> photographs of the facelift. "Not as good" was the shared response. I
> have to say - after looking at the result in the metal at Brooklands 2
> weeks back- that I agree. And I'm unsure about the whole "corporate
> nose" thing anyway - on the 166 I think it is aesthetic vandalism to
> stick on the 147 grill. The 166 is a large car with a subtle and mature
> appeal. The original grill suited it well - the drama of the 147 nose
> (which is great on the small Alfa & pretty damn good on the GT) is ill
> at ease on such a car.
>
> Every car needs a nose suiting its proportions, style and intended
> audience. "Corporate nosing" f***ks this up. With the 156, I'm not
> knocking Giugiario - as corporate nose restyles go, its really very
> good. But with a car this beautiful, not as good as leaving well alone.
>
> So my proposition on the 156 is: the most beautiful production saloon of
> recent years is no longer in production. It has been replaced by a
> significantly less beautiful car and history will bear this out...



  #13  
Old May 24th 04, 08:15 PM
Pete
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Mon, 24 May 2004 06:06:17 +0100, "rp.addicott"
>, wrote:

>SPOT ON they are going to bring in the 158 next year so why spoil the 156?
>but hey Have u seen the S2000 Touring car take a look

Looks MUCH nicer in the flesh <VBWG>

Pete
--
>
156 2.0 TS (2001) - Proteo Rosso (his)
147 2.0 TS (2002) - Gem Green (her's)
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AutoBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.