Don't buy a honda after year 2k?

Mechanics I talk to say not to get a Honda after model year 2000. That
Honda really cheapened their cars and did away with a lot of the things that
made them uniquely Honda and different in a better way.

What?? My wife and I have an '02 CRV and 03 Civic. Have 0ver 30,000 on the
CRV an about 22,000 on the Civic. Not a single problem on either!

> From: "Sam Steele" >
> Newsgroups: rec.autos.makers.honda
> Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2004 03:11:07 GMT
> Subject: Don't buy a honda after year 2k?
>
> Mechanics I talk to say not to get a Honda after model year 2000. That
> Honda really cheapened their cars and did away with a lot of the things that
> made them uniquely Honda and different in a better way.
>
>

What?? My wife and I have an '02 CRV and 03 Civic. Have 0ver 30,000 on the
CRV an about 22,000 on the Civic. Not a single problem on either!

> From: "Sam Steele" >
> Newsgroups: rec.autos.makers.honda
> Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2004 03:11:07 GMT
> Subject: Don't buy a honda after year 2k?
>
> Mechanics I talk to say not to get a Honda after model year 2000. That
> Honda really cheapened their cars and did away with a lot of the things that
> made them uniquely Honda and different in a better way.
>
>

Sam Steele wrote:

> Mechanics I talk to say not to get a Honda after model year 2000. That
> Honda really cheapened their cars and did away with a lot of the things that
> made them uniquely Honda and different in a better way.
>
>

i just dont care for the styling or suspension, myself. im keeping my
98. i do like the older, 88-91 civics. low cowl, nice styling.

Sam Steele wrote:

> Mechanics I talk to say not to get a Honda after model year 2000. That
> Honda really cheapened their cars and did away with a lot of the things that
> made them uniquely Honda and different in a better way.
>
>

i just dont care for the styling or suspension, myself. im keeping my
98. i do like the older, 88-91 civics. low cowl, nice styling.

What???? I have a 2003 V6 Accord and a 2003 S2000. Between them
these are 70,000 trouble free miles. No problems, no squeaks and
rattles. I'd recommend either to anybody.

On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 03:11:07 GMT, "Sam Steele" >
wrote:

>Mechanics I talk to say not to get a Honda after model year 2000. That
>Honda really cheapened their cars and did away with a lot of the things that
>made them uniquely Honda and different in a better way.
>

What???? I have a 2003 V6 Accord and a 2003 S2000. Between them
these are 70,000 trouble free miles. No problems, no squeaks and
rattles. I'd recommend either to anybody.

On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 03:11:07 GMT, "Sam Steele" >
wrote:

>Mechanics I talk to say not to get a Honda after model year 2000. That
>Honda really cheapened their cars and did away with a lot of the things that
>made them uniquely Honda and different in a better way.
>

by chance were they mechanics from another company?!?! if sdo they just want
u to buy their cars. me whole family has hondas my sis, dad,and mom have
2000+ accords and civic...all have not 1 single problem with it..the
mechanic u talked to is a ****in dumbass
"Sam Steele" > wrote in message
news:f9xpd.2840$cE3.1075@clgrps12...
> Mechanics I talk to say not to get a Honda after model year 2000. That
> Honda really cheapened their cars and did away with a lot of the things
that
> made them uniquely Honda and different in a better way.
>
>

by chance were they mechanics from another company?!?! if sdo they just want
u to buy their cars. me whole family has hondas my sis, dad,and mom have
2000+ accords and civic...all have not 1 single problem with it..the
mechanic u talked to is a ****in dumbass
"Sam Steele" > wrote in message
news:f9xpd.2840$cE3.1075@clgrps12...
> Mechanics I talk to say not to get a Honda after model year 2000. That
> Honda really cheapened their cars and did away with a lot of the things
that
> made them uniquely Honda and different in a better way.
>
>

SoCalMike wrote:
> Sam Steele wrote:
>
>> Mechanics I talk to say not to get a Honda after model year 2000.
>> That Honda really cheapened their cars and did away with a lot of the
>> things that made them uniquely Honda and different in a better way.
>>
>
> i just dont care for the styling or suspension, myself. im keeping my
> 98. i do like the older, 88-91 civics. low cowl, nice styling.

i love that vintage civic too. based on what i've seen, including the
abandonment of wishbone suspension, there's no way i'd buy a post 2000
honda. yes, i know the accords still use wishbones, but when the next
gen accord abondons them too, we'll know for sure that honda is now run
by bean counters, not car enthusiasts like it used to be.