|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
September 14th 07, 03:34 PM
posted to rec.autos.makers.ford.mustang
|
|||
|
|||
351 Edelbrock intake manifold fit on a 69 302
Hi Everyone:
Would a 351 windsor Edelbrock intake manifold fit on a 69 mustang 302? I have ask around and I'm getting conflick info. I thought maybe some of you has had experience with this. Thanking you in advance for your response. Don 
|
| Ads |
|
#2
September 14th 07, 04:51 PM
posted to rec.autos.makers.ford.mustang
|
|||
|
|||
|
351 Edelbrock intake manifold fit on a 69 302
waterboy wrote:
> Hi Everyone: > > Would a 351 windsor Edelbrock intake manifold fit on a 69 mustang > 302? I have ask around and I'm getting conflick info. I thought > maybe some of you has had experience with this. > > Thanking you in advance for your response. The dimensions are different on these blocks and the lower intakes (or intakes on carbed models) are not interchangeable.
|
|
#3
September 14th 07, 08:03 PM
posted to rec.autos.makers.ford.mustang
|
|||
|
|||
|
351 Edelbrock intake manifold fit on a 69 302
waterboy wrote:
> Hi Everyone: > > Would a 351 Windsor Edelbrock intake manifold fit on a 69 mustang > 302? I have ask around and I'm getting conflick info. I thought > maybe some of you has had experience with this. > > Thanking you in advance for your response. > > Don > No. It's too wide. But I know where there's a factory 1970 302 4 bbl cast iron intake that will bolt right on. But it will set you back $2000(includes the entire running engine carb-to-pan). I have a factory 1973 302 4 bbl cast iron intake on my 73 Mustang, but you can't have it. I'm using it. There are economical aluminum manifolds available for carbys & FI. Rob
|
|
#4
September 14th 07, 10:20 PM
posted to rec.autos.makers.ford.mustang
|
|||
|
|||
|
351 Edelbrock intake manifold fit on a 69 302
NO, different dimensions...
"waterboy" > wrote in message oups.com... > Hi Everyone: > > Would a 351 windsor Edelbrock intake manifold fit on a 69 mustang > 302? I have ask around and I'm getting conflick info. I thought > maybe some of you has had experience with this. > > Thanking you in advance for your response. > > Don >
|
|
#5
September 14th 07, 10:24 PM
posted to rec.autos.makers.ford.mustang
|
|||
|
|||
|
351 Edelbrock intake manifold fit on a 69 302
"trainfan1" > wrote in message et... > waterboy wrote: >> Hi Everyone: >> >> Would a 351 Windsor Edelbrock intake manifold fit on a 69 mustang >> 302? I have ask around and I'm getting conflick info. I thought >> maybe some of you has had experience with this. >> >> Thanking you in advance for your response. >> >> Don >> > > No. It's too wide. > > But I know where there's a factory 1970 302 4 bbl cast iron intake that > will bolt right on. But it will set you back $2000(includes the entire > running engine carb-to-pan). > > I have a factory 1973 302 4 bbl cast iron intake on my 73 Mustang, but you > can't have it. I'm using it. > > There are economical aluminum manifolds available for carbys & FI. > > Rob Ah, Rob, You better check your casting numbers, that is a '68 302 intake, Ford DID NOT make a 1973 cast iron 4 barrel intake manifold...
|
|
#6
September 15th 07, 02:20 AM
posted to rec.autos.makers.ford.mustang
|
|||
|
|||
|
351 Edelbrock intake manifold fit on a 69 302
My Name Is Nobody wrote:
> "trainfan1" > wrote in message > et... >> waterboy wrote: >>> Hi Everyone: >>> >>> Would a 351 Windsor Edelbrock intake manifold fit on a 69 mustang >>> 302? I have ask around and I'm getting conflick info. I thought >>> maybe some of you has had experience with this. >>> >>> Thanking you in advance for your response. >>> >>> Don >>> >> No. It's too wide. >> >> But I know where there's a factory 1970 302 4 bbl cast iron intake that >> will bolt right on. But it will set you back $2000(includes the entire >> running engine carb-to-pan). >> >> I have a factory 1973 302 4 bbl cast iron intake on my 73 Mustang, but you >> can't have it. I'm using it. >> >> There are economical aluminum manifolds available for carbys & FI. >> >> Rob > > > > Ah, Rob, > > You better check your casting numbers, that is a '68 302 intake, Ford DID > NOT make a 1973 cast iron 4 barrel intake manifold... > > Sure they did. I've got one, I've seen others. You just have to know where to look... Rob
|
|
#7
September 15th 07, 05:04 AM
posted to rec.autos.makers.ford.mustang
|
|||
|
|||
|
351 Edelbrock intake manifold fit on a 69 302
"trainfan1" > wrote in message et... > My Name Is Nobody wrote: >> "trainfan1" > wrote in message >> et... >>> waterboy wrote: >>>> Hi Everyone: >>>> >>>> Would a 351 Windsor Edelbrock intake manifold fit on a 69 mustang >>>> 302? I have ask around and I'm getting conflick info. I thought >>>> maybe some of you has had experience with this. >>>> >>>> Thanking you in advance for your response. >>>> >>>> Don >>>> >>> No. It's too wide. >>> >>> But I know where there's a factory 1970 302 4 bbl cast iron intake that >>> will bolt right on. But it will set you back $2000(includes the entire >>> running engine carb-to-pan). >>> >>> I have a factory 1973 302 4 bbl cast iron intake on my 73 Mustang, but >>> you can't have it. I'm using it. >>> >>> There are economical aluminum manifolds available for carbys & FI. >>> >>> Rob >> >> >> >> Ah, Rob, >> >> You better check your casting numbers, that is a '68 302 intake, Ford DID >> NOT make a 1973 cast iron 4 barrel intake manifold... > > Sure they did. I've got one, I've seen others. You just have to know > where to look... > > Rob Not in the US, post a picture of the casting number...
|
|
#8
September 15th 07, 05:27 AM
posted to rec.autos.makers.ford.mustang
|
|||
|
|||
|
351 Edelbrock intake manifold fit on a 69 302
My Name Is Nobody wrote:
> "trainfan1" > wrote in message > et... >> My Name Is Nobody wrote: >>> "trainfan1" > wrote in message >>> et... >>>> waterboy wrote: >>>>> Hi Everyone: >>>>> >>>>> Would a 351 Windsor Edelbrock intake manifold fit on a 69 mustang >>>>> 302? I have ask around and I'm getting conflick info. I thought >>>>> maybe some of you has had experience with this. >>>>> >>>>> Thanking you in advance for your response. >>>>> >>>>> Don >>>>> >>>> No. It's too wide. >>>> >>>> But I know where there's a factory 1970 302 4 bbl cast iron intake that >>>> will bolt right on. But it will set you back $2000(includes the entire >>>> running engine carb-to-pan). >>>> >>>> I have a factory 1973 302 4 bbl cast iron intake on my 73 Mustang, but >>>> you can't have it. I'm using it. >>>> >>>> There are economical aluminum manifolds available for carbys & FI. >>>> >>>> Rob >>> >>> >>> Ah, Rob, >>> >>> You better check your casting numbers, that is a '68 302 intake, Ford DID >>> NOT make a 1973 cast iron 4 barrel intake manifold... >> Sure they did. I've got one, I've seen others. You just have to know >> where to look... >> >> Rob > > Not in the US, post a picture of the casting number... > > > http://tinyurl.com/2vfffg http://tinyurl.com/2wtt4u http://tinyurl.com/32zdqx http://tinyurl.com/35lhsk http://tinyurl.com/2w7wwl Rob
|
|
#9
September 15th 07, 05:57 AM
posted to rec.autos.makers.ford.mustang
|
|||
|
|||
|
351 Edelbrock intake manifold fit on a 69 302
"trainfan1" > wrote in message ... > My Name Is Nobody wrote: >> "trainfan1" > wrote in message >> et... >>> My Name Is Nobody wrote: >>>> "trainfan1" > wrote in message >>>> et... >>>>> waterboy wrote: >>>>>> Hi Everyone: >>>>>> >>>>>> Would a 351 Windsor Edelbrock intake manifold fit on a 69 mustang >>>>>> 302? I have ask around and I'm getting conflick info. I thought >>>>>> maybe some of you has had experience with this. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanking you in advance for your response. >>>>>> >>>>>> Don >>>>>> >>>>> No. It's too wide. >>>>> >>>>> But I know where there's a factory 1970 302 4 bbl cast iron intake >>>>> that will bolt right on. But it will set you back $2000(includes the >>>>> entire running engine carb-to-pan). >>>>> >>>>> I have a factory 1973 302 4 bbl cast iron intake on my 73 Mustang, but >>>>> you can't have it. I'm using it. >>>>> >>>>> There are economical aluminum manifolds available for carbys & FI. >>>>> >>>>> Rob >>>> >>>> >>>> Ah, Rob, >>>> >>>> You better check your casting numbers, that is a '68 302 intake, Ford >>>> DID NOT make a 1973 cast iron 4 barrel intake manifold... >>> Sure they did. I've got one, I've seen others. You just have to know >>> where to look... >>> >>> Rob >> >> Not in the US, post a picture of the casting number... > > > > > http://tinyurl.com/2vfffg > http://tinyurl.com/2wtt4u > http://tinyurl.com/32zdqx > http://tinyurl.com/35lhsk > http://tinyurl.com/2w7wwl > > Rob So what model a year US Ford is that?
|
|
#10
September 15th 07, 06:31 AM
posted to rec.autos.makers.ford.mustang
|
|||
|
|||
|
351 Edelbrock intake manifold fit on a 69 302
My Name Is Nobody wrote:
> "trainfan1" > wrote in message > ... >> My Name Is Nobody wrote: >>> "trainfan1" > wrote in message >>> et... >>>> My Name Is Nobody wrote: >>>>> "trainfan1" > wrote in message >>>>> et... >>>>>> waterboy wrote: >>>>>>> Hi Everyone: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Would a 351 Windsor Edelbrock intake manifold fit on a 69 mustang >>>>>>> 302? I have ask around and I'm getting conflick info. I thought >>>>>>> maybe some of you has had experience with this. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanking you in advance for your response. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Don >>>>>>> >>>>>> No. It's too wide. >>>>>> >>>>>> But I know where there's a factory 1970 302 4 bbl cast iron intake >>>>>> that will bolt right on. But it will set you back $2000(includes the >>>>>> entire running engine carb-to-pan). >>>>>> >>>>>> I have a factory 1973 302 4 bbl cast iron intake on my 73 Mustang, but >>>>>> you can't have it. I'm using it. >>>>>> >>>>>> There are economical aluminum manifolds available for carbys & FI. >>>>>> >>>>>> Rob >>>>> >>>>> Ah, Rob, >>>>> >>>>> You better check your casting numbers, that is a '68 302 intake, Ford >>>>> DID NOT make a 1973 cast iron 4 barrel intake manifold... >>>> Sure they did. I've got one, I've seen others. You just have to know >>>> where to look... >>>> >>>> Rob >>> Not in the US, post a picture of the casting number... >> http://tinyurl.com/2vfffg >> http://tinyurl.com/2wtt4u >> http://tinyurl.com/32zdqx >> http://tinyurl.com/35lhsk >> http://tinyurl.com/2w7wwl >> >> Rob > > So what model a year US Ford is that? > > They are all 4 1973 Ford 302 4 bbl Mustangs. The last one is mine. All with cast iron intakes. The casting on mine is a D2J. Rob Rob
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| CEMA reposts for them who missed 'em: 1972 Dodge Charger NASCAR Race Car 426 Hemi with Edelbrock Intake Manifold Blue (2006 CEMA) CL.jpg 333945 bytes | HEMI-Powered @ [email protected] | Auto Photos | 0 | March 17th 07 11:30 AM |
| Question: Edelbrock manifold | goodnigh | Ford Mustang | 13 | October 26th 06 07:39 AM |
| Edelbrock AMC Performer intake and 1406 Carb For Sale | [email protected] | Jeep | 0 | November 30th 05 09:23 PM |
| Buick Nailhead 401-425 EDELBROCK B262 Dual Quad Intake | justjoe61 | Technology | 0 | September 9th 05 05:35 AM |
| AMC V8 Edelbrock Intake F/A | QuickTruck | Jeep | 5 | June 11th 05 04:50 PM |
Linear Mode
