If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
HORSEPOWER
Something good to keep in mind. I never thought of where the torque peaks.
Thanks for the info. Love this group. Brad "66StangMan" > wrote in message ... > The MOD that makes the most increase of HP would be the Camshaft. The cam > opens and closes the valves. So if you install a camshaft with higher lift > and longer duration, you are allowing more air/fuel to enter the > combustion chamber, thus more Torque/HP, and usually a higher redline. > Heads & intake will help in boosting Torque & HP, but installing a larger > cam will usually yield better results. Just remember, the more duration of > the cam, the more lopey it will be. > > If you intend to drag race, here's something to consider. Pick a > combination that will start building torque around the RPM you intend to > launch the car at. If you are going to launch at let's say 4000 rpm's, you > don't want your torque to peak until after you have already launched. If > you build allot of torque before your launch RPM, then your going to need > slicks (M/T ET Drags or equivalent) so you don't spin off the line. Allot > of people make the mistake of building torque down too low, then wonder > why they can't get traction at the drag strip. > > But to answer your question, what you've actually done was raise the upper > RPM limit, thus more HP. > > 66StangMan > > "BradandBrooks" > wrote in message > newsRKhh.497057$1T2.361236@pd7urf2no... >> >> So, one more question... >> >> We all know we can add heads and an intake, etc, say with a kit from any >> major manufacturer, and increase the 5.0s horsepower to, say, 300 horse. >> But, what did we really do when we made these changes? How do these parts >> change the horsepower on the engine, since the crank is still spinning >> the same, isn't it? >> >> Brad > > |
Ads |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
HORSEPOWER
So what camshaft would you recommend for an 07 GT?
StratMan 66StangMan wrote: > The MOD that makes the most increase of HP would be the Camshaft. The cam > opens and closes the valves. So if you install a camshaft with higher lift > and longer duration, you are allowing more air/fuel to enter the combustion > chamber, thus more Torque/HP, and usually a higher redline. Heads & intake > will help in boosting Torque & HP, but installing a larger cam will usually > yield better results. Just remember, the more duration of the cam, the more > lopey it will be. > > If you intend to drag race, here's something to consider. Pick a combination > that will start building torque around the RPM you intend to launch the car > at. If you are going to launch at let's say 4000 rpm's, you don't want your > torque to peak until after you have already launched. If you build allot of > torque before your launch RPM, then your going to need slicks (M/T ET Drags > or equivalent) so you don't spin off the line. Allot of people make the > mistake of building torque down too low, then wonder why they can't get > traction at the drag strip. > > But to answer your question, what you've actually done was raise the upper > RPM limit, thus more HP. > > 66StangMan > > "BradandBrooks" > wrote in message > newsRKhh.497057$1T2.361236@pd7urf2no... > > > > So, one more question... > > > > We all know we can add heads and an intake, etc, say with a kit from any > > major manufacturer, and increase the 5.0s horsepower to, say, 300 horse. > > But, what did we really do when we made these changes? How do these parts > > change the horsepower on the engine, since the crank is still spinning the > > same, isn't it? > > > > Brad |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
HORSEPOWER
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
HORSEPOWER
I'm not too sure new cams will make a significant difference with an
'07 Mustang. Bob is absolutely correct in calling an internal combustion engine essentially an "air pump." The entire air path from intake to exhaust plays a role in the efficiency of this "air pump." The cam profile, albeit important, is just one piece of the puzzle. Since the '05+ 4.6L uses the valve head from the larger 5.4L Triton motor, air flow from the throttle body to the cylinders really isn't a problem. Furthermore the new S197's variable valve timing and sophisticated computer optimizes valve lift & timing to produce strong low-end torque as well a free-breathing for more HP at high rpm. The new Mustang's exhaust is well-done as well, perhaps one of the finest stock exhausts in a mass production car. The stock cat-back plumbing is 2-1/2" mandrel-bent (smooth bends for better flow) with an H-pipe. The mufflers are a high-flow design and the cast header flows nicely as well. Aftermarket exhausts can change the sound of your Mustang, but don't expect any difference at the dyno, unless you remove the cats (worth about 15-20 hp). It's been pretty well-documented that the weak link in the Mustang's "air pump" is the air filter & box. By far the best bang-for-the-buck mod on a S197 GT is a cone filter with a computer retune. The JLT intake with SCT2 tune (93 octane) netted me nearly 30 rwhp (292 rwhp vs. 265 stock)! After that gains are much more incremental due to the Mustang's well-designed stock motor and exhaust. Tweaks such as underdrive pulleys, "off-road" (no cat) X-pipe, headers, mufflers, etc. can nudge an S197 GT eventually to around 310-315 rwhp; but to leap significantly beyond that, you need to force-feed the motor via a blower, turbo, or nitrous. WindsorFox wrote: > wrote: > > So what camshaft would you recommend for an 07 GT? > > > > StratMan > > > > 66StangMan wrote: > > > Well first, I would say start with more than one and go > from there.... P > > > -- > "I intended that "not stupid" be a requirement." - Seth > Breidbart |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
HORSEPOWER
I'm not too sure new cams will make a significant difference with an
'07 Mustang. Bob is absolutely correct in calling an internal combustion engine essentially an "air pump." The entire air path from intake to exhaust plays a role in the efficiency of this "air pump." The cam profile, albeit important, is just one piece of the puzzle. Since the '05+ 4.6L uses the valve head from the larger 5.4L Triton motor, air flow from the throttle body to the cylinders really isn't a problem. Furthermore the new S197's variable valve timing and sophisticated computer optimizes valve lift & timing to produce strong low-end torque as well a free-breathing for more HP at high rpm. The new Mustang's exhaust is well-done as well, perhaps one of the finest stock exhausts in a mass production car. The stock cat-back plumbing is 2-1/2" mandrel-bent (smooth bends for better flow) with an H-pipe. The mufflers are a high-flow design and the cast header flows nicely as well. Aftermarket exhausts can change the sound of your Mustang, but don't expect any difference at the dyno, unless you remove the cats (worth about 15-20 hp). It's been pretty well-documented that the weak link in the Mustang's "air pump" is the air filter & box. By far the best bang-for-the-buck mod on a S197 GT is a cone filter with a computer retune. The JLT intake with SCT2 tune (93 octane) netted me nearly 30 rwhp (292 rwhp vs. 265 stock)! After that gains are much more incremental due to the Mustang's well-designed stock motor and exhaust. Tweaks such as underdrive pulleys, "off-road" (no cat) X-pipe, headers, mufflers, etc. can nudge an S197 GT eventually to around 310-315 rwhp; but to leap significantly beyond that, you need to force-feed the motor via a blower, turbo, or nitrous. WindsorFox wrote: > wrote: > > So what camshaft would you recommend for an 07 GT? > > > > StratMan > > > > 66StangMan wrote: > > > Well first, I would say start with more than one and go > from there.... P > > > -- > "I intended that "not stupid" be a requirement." - Seth > Breidbart |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
HORSEPOWER
Jeff wrote:
> I'm not too sure new cams will make a significant difference with an > '07 Mustang. Bob is absolutely correct in calling an internal > combustion engine essentially an "air pump." The entire air path from > intake to exhaust plays a role in the efficiency of this "air pump." > The cam profile, albeit important, is just one piece of the puzzle. > Since the '05+ 4.6L uses the valve head from the larger 5.4L Triton > motor, air flow from the throttle body to the cylinders really isn't a > problem. Furthermore the new S197's variable valve timing and > sophisticated computer optimizes valve lift & timing to produce strong > low-end torque as well a free-breathing for more HP at high rpm. > > The new Mustang's exhaust is well-done as well, perhaps one of the > finest stock exhausts in a mass production car. The stock cat-back > plumbing is 2-1/2" mandrel-bent (smooth bends for better flow) with an > H-pipe. The mufflers are a high-flow design and the cast header flows > nicely as well. Aftermarket exhausts can change the sound of your > Mustang, but don't expect any difference at the dyno, unless you remove > the cats (worth about 15-20 hp). > > It's been pretty well-documented that the weak link in the Mustang's > "air pump" is the air filter & box. By far the best bang-for-the-buck > mod on a S197 GT is a cone filter with a computer retune. The JLT > intake with SCT2 tune (93 octane) netted me nearly 30 rwhp (292 rwhp > vs. 265 stock)! After that gains are much more incremental due to the > Mustang's well-designed stock motor and exhaust. Tweaks such as > underdrive pulleys, "off-road" (no cat) X-pipe, headers, mufflers, etc. > can nudge an S197 GT eventually to around 310-315 rwhp; but to leap > significantly beyond that, you need to force-feed the motor via a > blower, turbo, or nitrous. > > Well sure, just like a 5.0, if you expect cam/cams to make more than a little a difference you have to do something with the heads and the intake manifold. -- “I intended that "not stupid" be a requirement.” – Seth Breidbart |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
HORSEPOWER
Sorry for taking so long to reply. I've been extremely busy lately.
As for what camshafts I'd recommend, anything with more lift & duration than the stock cams. Think about it. What happens with more lift and duration in relation to air/fuel flow? Hmmm...<Jeopardy theme song plays> The air/fuel has a longer chance of entering the combustion chamber. The trade off though is a lopey idle. A cam swap is much more cheaper than doing a head swap any day. If your looking to swap the cams, look at the specs for the cams. The main 2 things to look at is the operating range and the max rpms. If you are looking to mainly drag race your car, you definitely don't want a cam that starts working (read start making gobs of torque) way below the rpm you intend to launch the car at. An example would be you intend to launch the car between 3500 & 4000 rpms. I would look for a cam that starts working around 3000 rpms or a tad higher. This way you will have a better chance of getting the car to hook up. Now some will tell you that the best way to increase HP is to install a blower on it. Yea, that's true, if you have bottomless pockets and don't care where your throwing your money. If your looking for the best bang for your bucks, a cam swap is the best route. 66stangman > wrote in message ups.com... > So what camshaft would you recommend for an 07 GT? > > StratMan > |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Humdrum Horsepower Numbers | [email protected] | Ford Mustang | 5 | September 21st 06 03:51 AM |
The "500" In GT500 means 500 Horsepower | [email protected] | Ford Mustang | 21 | May 8th 06 12:34 PM |
Why you should never buy a car without a tachometer | Ted B. | Driving | 112 | September 19th 05 04:09 AM |
Horsepower Still Sells | [email protected] | Ford Mustang | 1 | January 13th 05 04:45 AM |