If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Question for dealership auto techs
"jim" > wrote in message ... > > > Kevin wrote: >> >> > wrote in message >> oups.com... >> >I work at a Chevy dealership. I was pulling a monstrous SUV into a >> > tight stall and scraped the side. I am told that I need to pay for the >> > $600 in damages. Shouldn't the dealership have insurance for this? >> > This is the first time I have ever done this. >> > >> >> In most states they can not legally make you pay for the damage, but they >> certainly have the right to fire you if you do not. >> When I ran a shop I would try to determine if such an accident was >> careless >> or virtually unavoidable. If it was carelessness on the part of the >> employee, he had a choice of easy payroll deductions or a pink slip. > > I don't know what state you are in but in most states simply asking an > employee to pay for damages is considered to be extortion and is quite > illegal. You have various things you can do to discipline an employee > including immediate termination. Requiring that an employee buy their > way out of a disciplinary action is blackmail. > > -jim > Yeah, I realize that. I guess my reply did sound like I was saying pay up or get fired. I should have worded that differently. There are ways to accomplish that without actually comming across as an extorsionist. Don't get me wrong though. In 18 years there were only two times a tech did somthing so stupid and with such disregard for common sense and safety that I actually expected them to be finacially responsible for their actions. I know what you mean by extortion and I must say I wouldn't do that. Of course, it was never put to the the idiot that he had to pay up or be fired, but he certainly understood that if he did not take responsibility for his actions then it wouldn't take me long to find a legitimate reason to get rid of him. In one case the employee just quit without complaint and the other actually wanted to make good his mistake. He continued to work for me for another ten years and 20 years later he is still a top tech at the shop I was supervising. As for the OP. I don't think the shop should charge him for the damage, even though I do not know all the circumstances, but it sure sounds like the shop should absorb that one and take a close look at their safety situation in the future. Kevin > >> We did >> have liability insurance to cover the damage, but our rates went up if we >> made too many claims, so we only used the insurance when necessary. >> -- >> Kevin Mouton >> Automotive Technology Instructor >> "If women don't find you handsome, they should at least find you handy" >> Red Green > > ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet > News==---- > http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ > Newsgroups > ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption > =---- |
Ads |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Question for dealership auto techs
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Question for dealership auto techs
« Paul »"wrote:
> Perhaps you should assume responsibility for your actions? > When I worked at a Ford dealership as a line tech I accidentally > backed into a pickup truck bed cap that another tech temporarily > placed behind the car I was working on. > I accepted responsibility for my actions and paid for what was > clearly my fault - I should have looked behind before moving my > vehicle. Very big of you.....but a foolish thing to do. I've been working in the trade for close to 30 years, and until recently, most employers I worked for always wanted the tech's to "be responsible". It's flat out illegal to make a tech pay for something like this...but there are enough tech's around that are either afraid for their job, or don't know their legal rights. It's the same thing as "chargebacks". This was very common in the dealership that I work at now, but I have never been charged back for anything. I simply told them it wasn't legal and that I would move on if they wanted to continue doing it. I guess they like my work so far. I've always been of the mind that the employer shouldn't try to nickle and dime me on things like accidents....if I have too many of them....get rid of me! Having worked for so long as a "flat rate" mechanic, it's been bred into me that I will fix a "comeback" that is clearly my mistake for no labour charge. Even this is illegal, but I am willing to take responsiblity. Fortunately, my dealership is fairly reasonable about "comebacks". Can't figure out why they are so silly about charging tech's back for other things. The funniest (or perhaps the saddest) part is that when the economy is in the dumper and it's more difficult to find a job, the employers turn into real assholes. Then when they can't find any tech's for the life of them.....all of a sudden they treat us like gold. Ian |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Question for dealership auto techs
> As for the OP. I don't think the shop should charge him for the damage,
> even though I do not know all the circumstances, but it sure sounds like > the shop should absorb that one and take a close look at their safety > situation in the future. > > Kevin The key point being that the shop chose to use that stall for that kind of vehicle... The shop was taking the risk that something like this would happen. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Theoretical auto engine thermodynamics question | JazzMan | Technology | 10 | November 12th 05 04:56 PM |
Question about auto leasing after losing license | Michael T | General | 1 | December 29th 04 04:50 PM |
67 Mustang auto trans question | N329DF | Ford Mustang | 2 | November 27th 04 03:47 PM |
1992 525i auto trans question | Scott | BMW | 3 | November 22nd 04 02:31 PM |
1992 525i Auto Trans question | Scott | BMW | 1 | October 10th 04 03:14 PM |