A Cars forum. AutoBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AutoBanter forum » Auto makers » Ford Mustang
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Are burnouts bad for my '05 GT? Seriously



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 8th 08, 02:01 AM posted to rec.autos.makers.ford.mustang
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2
Default Are burnouts bad for my '05 GT? Seriously

I know about tire wear. But other than that, what kind of damage can I
expect on my '05 GT with an automatic trans? It has 31,000 relatively
gentle miles, I'd like it to last years, but I want to have some fun
every once in awhile when nobody is around. I do all oil changes at
3,000 miles and use Mobil 1, 5-20w, and motorcraft filters.

Thanks
Ads
  #2  
Old March 8th 08, 02:48 AM posted to rec.autos.makers.ford.mustang
dwight[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 118
Default Are burnouts bad for my '05 GT? Seriously

> wrote in message
...
>I know about tire wear. But other than that, what kind of damage can I
> expect on my '05 GT with an automatic trans? It has 31,000 relatively
> gentle miles, I'd like it to last years, but I want to have some fun
> every once in awhile when nobody is around. I do all oil changes at
> 3,000 miles and use Mobil 1, 5-20w, and motorcraft filters.
>
> Thanks


I have no hard evidentiary facts for you, but, yes.

Are they "bad" for your car? Define "bad." Certainly, the car is capable of
doing burnouts all day every day, but you can expect one part or another to
fail faster than it would if you babied the thing.

Your transmission is going to need periodic maintenance. Burnouts will
probably hasten the need for that maintenance.

I only recently had a shift kid installed in my "new" '93 GT. Nothing fancy,
it only serves to greatly reduce the shift interval between gears. You might
want to look into one. Having an automatic that chirps the tires going into
2nd gear is pretty cool.

dwight
www.tfrog.com


  #7  
Old March 9th 08, 12:17 AM posted to rec.autos.makers.ford.mustang
WindsorFox[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 234
Default Are burnouts bad for my '05 GT? Seriously

dwight wrote:
> > wrote in message
> ...
>> I know about tire wear. But other than that, what kind of damage can I
>> expect on my '05 GT with an automatic trans? It has 31,000 relatively
>> gentle miles, I'd like it to last years, but I want to have some fun
>> every once in awhile when nobody is around. I do all oil changes at
>> 3,000 miles and use Mobil 1, 5-20w, and motorcraft filters.
>>
>> Thanks

>
> I have no hard evidentiary facts for you, but, yes.
>
> Are they "bad" for your car? Define "bad." Certainly, the car is capable of
> doing burnouts all day every day, but you can expect one part or another to
> fail faster than it would if you babied the thing.
>



Tires cone to mind....

--
"Yah know I hate it when forces gather in ma' fringe..." - Sheogorath

"Contacting shutterfly help is an exercise in stupidity
as they can't seem to grasp the fact it's NOT MY BLOODY
ACCOUNT and some ******, one crack pipe short of a holiday,
has signed me up in a system that has no closed loop
confirmation yet has credit card information for billing." - Rev.
Beergoggles
  #8  
Old March 9th 08, 11:51 PM posted to rec.autos.makers.ford.mustang
getfrog
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4
Default Are burnouts bad for my '05 GT? Seriously


> GUEST wrote:
> I know about tire wear. But other than that, what kind of damage

can I
> expect on my '05 GT with an automatic trans? It has 31,000

relatively
> gentle miles, I'd like it to last years, but I want to have some

fun
> every once in awhile when nobody is around. I do all oil changes at
> 3,000 miles and use Mobil 1, 5-20w, and motorcraft filters.
>
> Thanks


Your car will be fine... just don't do them all the
time or anything. I always spin the tires in my cars, but only really
do burnouts at the track.

  #9  
Old March 10th 08, 10:28 AM posted to rec.autos.makers.ford.mustang
John S.[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 221
Default Are burnouts bad for my '05 GT? Seriously

On Mar 8, 2:48 am, "dwight" > wrote:
> > wrote in message
>
> ...
>
> >I know about tire wear. But other than that, what kind of damage can I
> > expect on my '05 GT with an automatic trans? It has 31,000 relatively
> > gentle miles, I'd like it to last years, but I want to have some fun
> > every once in awhile when nobody is around. I do all oil changes at
> > 3,000 miles and use Mobil 1, 5-20w, and motorcraft filters.

>
> > Thanks

>
> I have no hard evidentiary facts for you, but, yes.
>
> Are they "bad" for your car? Define "bad." Certainly, the car is capable of
> doing burnouts all day every day, but you can expect one part or another to
> fail faster than it would if you babied the thing.
>
> Your transmission is going to need periodic maintenance. Burnouts will
> probably hasten the need for that maintenance.
>
> I only recently had a shift kid installed in my "new" '93 GT. Nothing fancy,
> it only serves to greatly reduce the shift interval between gears. You might
> want to look into one. Having an automatic that chirps the tires going into
> 2nd gear is pretty cool.
>
> dwightwww.tfrog.com


The fun thing about the 5r55s automatic tranny in the S197 Mustangs is
it's computer controlled... no more shift kits... shift points, shift
firmness, etc. are all controlled by the computer!

I had 60,000 very hard miles on mine without a single problem. LOTS
of burnouts, lots of N20 bottles, etc. Only thing i found was it
really like to have it's fluid changed about every 20,000 miles...
  #10  
Old March 10th 08, 11:47 AM posted to rec.autos.makers.ford.mustang
ah[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5
Default Are burnouts bad for my '05 GT? Seriously

"dwight" > wrote in message
...
> > wrote in message
> ...
>>I know about tire wear. But other than that, what kind of damage can I
>> expect on my '05 GT with an automatic trans? It has 31,000 relatively
>> gentle miles, I'd like it to last years, but I want to have some fun
>> every once in awhile when nobody is around. I do all oil changes at
>> 3,000 miles and use Mobil 1, 5-20w, and motorcraft filters.
>>
>> Thanks

>
> I have no hard evidentiary facts for you, but, yes.
>
> Are they "bad" for your car? Define "bad." Certainly, the car is capable
> of doing burnouts all day every day, but you can expect one part or
> another to fail faster than it would if you babied the thing.
>
> Your transmission is going to need periodic maintenance. Burnouts will
> probably hasten the need for that maintenance.
>
> I only recently had a shift kid installed in my "new" '93 GT. Nothing
> fancy, it only serves to greatly reduce the shift interval between gears.
> You might want to look into one. Having an automatic that chirps the tires
> going into 2nd gear is pretty cool.
>
>Thompson Engineering kit?


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Burnouts rear wheel vs front wheel snowolf9637 Driving 25 March 9th 07 01:04 AM
FWD burnouts steve Honda 10 January 9th 05 06:55 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AutoBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.