If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
"Jeremy" > wrote
> "Caroline" > wrote > > "Jeremy" > wrote > > > "Randolph" > wrote > > snip > > > > Many Hondas have a feature where the alternator output voltage is > > > > dropped at idle under low-load conditions in order to save fuel. I > > know > > > > they did this as far back as '94, not sure if they did it in '88. > > On my > > > > '94 Civic you can defeat this voltage reduction by stepping on the > > > > brakes (foot pedal only, hand brake does not count). > > > > On my 1991 Civic, turning on the headlights defeats it. > > > > In other words, starting the car in the morning in summer temperatures > > and no loads yields a battery terminal voltage of 12.7 volts. Turn on > > the headlights, and it jumps to between 14 and 14.5 volts. > > > > It seems that the '88 Civic has this built in as well, as stepping on the > brakes and raising the RPM to 2500-3000 did engage the alternator. So > there's good news: the alternator's working (for now). For the archives: I also checked an online subscription auto repair resource called "AllData" (not available to the public per se but at my local community college) yesterday. For both the 91 Civic and the 1988 Civic, the steps for checking the alternator's voltage regulator explicitly include turning on just the headlights with the car running. The battery terminal voltage is supposed to go up when the headlight load is applied for both models. Kinda funny how different the checks are from Autozone to Chilton's to the UK site's to AllData's. They're usually almost identical. But it's also cool that AllData recommends a check that some of us formulated on our own. Hope you get your car fixed! |
Ads |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
"Jeremy"
> "Graham W" > > "Jeremy" > > Don't throw either Main Relay unit away since the 'dry' joint is just > > about the only thing that goes wrong with them and that is mendable. >I haven't been terribly motivated to get back in there > and pull it out again... I will have to pull it out in the near future and > open it up to look for dry joints though. Hopefully that will be the > problem, Reach up and tap on it. Usually this will start the car if it's the problem. Mount it lower next time. About that starter, I've taken the solenoid and starter apart before on this vehicle. The solenoid is not built to last compared to the starter. That is why you'll do better to load test the starter inside the car. The solenoid is cheaper than a starter, so decide carefully how to spend your college money. Rick |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
"Ricky Spartacus" > wrote in message news:1099455445.mi/nf4PxghNKuCVDejIlHw@bubbanews... > "Jeremy" > > "Graham W" > > > "Jeremy" > > > Don't throw either Main Relay unit away since the 'dry' joint is just > > > about the only thing that goes wrong with them and that is mendable. > > >I haven't been terribly motivated to get back in there > > and pull it out again... I will have to pull it out in the near future and > > open it up to look for dry joints though. Hopefully that will be the > > problem, > > Reach up and tap on it. Usually this will start the car if it's the problem. I'll try this next time the issue arises... thanks > Mount it lower next time. > About that starter, I've taken the solenoid > and starter apart before on this vehicle. The solenoid is not built to last > compared to the starter. That is why you'll do better to load test the > starter inside the car. The solenoid is cheaper than a starter, so decide > carefully how to spend your college money. > In the end, this is exactly what was done... but since my mechanical know-how really does not extend beyond re & re (if that! ) I brought it into the shop again and paid the $45 shop rate plus the solenoid replacement... under $100 (Canadian) in the end. Not bad... Thanks for the advice! Jeremy |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
"Caroline" > wrote in message news:5HQhd.17162 > > For the archives: > > I also checked an online subscription auto repair resource called > "AllData" (not available to the public per se but at my local > community college) yesterday. For both the 91 Civic and the 1988 > Civic, the steps for checking the alternator's voltage regulator > explicitly include turning on just the headlights with the car > running. The battery terminal voltage is supposed to go up when the > headlight load is applied for both models. > > Kinda funny how different the checks are from Autozone to Chilton's to > the UK site's to AllData's. They're usually almost identical. But it's > also cool that AllData recommends a check that some of us formulated > on our own. > > Hope you get your car fixed! > Thanks Caroline... that's interesting stuff, I'll be sure to remember it next time my battery fails. For now, all is well again... (aside from the main relay that I won't get to for a few weeks)... next I get to worry about the erratic idle problem, but I think I can get most of the info I need on that from either Haynes, Chilton, or the archives of this group. peace...Jer |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
New *FREE* Corvette Discussion Forum | JLA ENTERPRISES TECHNOLOGIES INTEGRATION | Corvette | 12 | November 30th 04 06:36 PM |
2000 Honda Civic Power Window Problem | [email protected] | Honda | 6 | October 31st 04 01:46 AM |
1997 civic transmission or ecu problem ?? | Matt | Honda | 1 | October 10th 04 05:00 PM |
1996 Caravan Starter Problem | Ralph Waldo Emerson | Dodge | 0 | September 11th 04 04:15 AM |