OT Testing

testing, 1,2,3,.....

"Chris D'Agnolo" > wrote:

> testing, 1,2,3,.....

Why the test, Chris? You know test messages are unnecessary, if you
want to post go ahead and do it, it'll get here or not which serves the
exact same purpose as a test message w/o being a violation of
netiquette.


--
XS11E, Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project:
http://improve-usenet.org

XS11E wrote:

> Why the test, Chris? You know test messages are unnecessary, if you
> want to post go ahead and do it, it'll get here or not which serves the
> exact same purpose as a test message w/o being a violation of
> netiquette.

{sarcasm mode on}

Yes Chris, please stop violating netiquette with these rogue test posts.

I will get no ****ing sleep tonight after seeing this incredibly active
and important newsgroup abused by you in such a way.

Oh ****, I think that profanity is a violation of netiquette as well....

Pat

{sarcasm mode still on}

* pws wrote in rec.autos.makers.mazda.miata:

> XS11E wrote:
>
>> Why the test, Chris? You know test messages are unnecessary, if you
>> want to post go ahead and do it, it'll get here or not which serves the
>> exact same purpose as a test message w/o being a violation of
>> netiquette.
>
> {sarcasm mode on}
>
> Yes Chris, please stop violating netiquette with these rogue test posts.
>
> I will get no ****ing sleep tonight after seeing this incredibly active
> and important newsgroup abused by you in such a way.
>
> Oh ****, I think that profanity is a violation of netiquette as well....

Please cite the RFC...

{sarcasm mode still on}

--
David