If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
HOV lane behavior...
just wondering what people's thoughts are on this....
in so. cal, the HOV lanes are restricted 24 hrs/day to 2+ occupants. exiting and entering the lanes are also restricted by solid white lines. there are dotted exit/entry areas every 1-3 miles that are pretty short (less than a quarter mile sometimes), especially for the volume, speed differential of traffic on routes with these lanes (i.e. HOV lanes cruising at 65-70 MPH while the rest of traffic stuck at less than 40) and bunches of cars moving in and out at those few allowed lane change points. in short, getting in and out of those HOV lanes at peak times can be a challenge, to say the least. anyway, my question is how strictly LLBing protocol should be applied to HOV lanes in y'all's opinions. i nearly always drive with a passenger and thus usually use the HOV lanes. i set the cruise at a nice 70MPH in these lanes whenever possible (they're signed at 65MPH) and will let any speedsters past when legal and possible, though sometimes there's no choice but to wait a mile or two until the beloved dotted line returns. the problem is during PEAK times when traffic is bumper to bumper in teh non-HOV lanes and going much slower than the sailing HOV traffic. letting the guy who wants to do 80+ pass can be dang near impossible because that maneuver usually requries waiting for the lane change zone and then SLAMMING on the brakes as i cut into the non-restricted lanes. this is probably putting too fine a point on it, but you get the picture. plus the fact that once you're out of the lanes, you've gotta get back IN, which can be tricky in said traffic, especially if you've used that whole dotted line zone just to find a slot to get out of the lane. i happen to think so. cal drivers are actually *more* courteous and sensible than the average driver in other areas of the country, contrary to popular belief. but every so often you get the uber-agressive tailgater types who will tailgate in the HOV lane with NOWHERE for me to legally get over to let them pass. my solution is usually to use a subtle "ruboff" maneuver of cancelling the cruise and letting my speed drop from 70 to about 60. and then accelerate hard back to 70. lather, rinse, repeat as necessary, usually the message is received with a minimum amount of ire and i avoid the confrontational "brake tap" warning. and i continue to look for the next possible place to get over. thoughts? brink |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
brink wrote:
> just wondering what people's thoughts are on this.... > > in so. cal, the HOV lanes are restricted 24 hrs/day to 2+ occupants. > exiting and entering the lanes are also restricted by solid white lines. > there are dotted exit/entry areas every 1-3 miles that are pretty short > (less than a quarter mile sometimes), especially for the volume, speed > differential of traffic on routes with these lanes (i.e. HOV lanes cruising > at 65-70 MPH while the rest of traffic stuck at less than 40) and bunches of > cars moving in and out at those few allowed lane change points. > > in short, getting in and out of those HOV lanes at peak times can be a > challenge, to say the least. > > anyway, my question is how strictly LLBing protocol should be applied to HOV > lanes in y'all's opinions. i nearly always drive with a passenger and thus > usually use the HOV lanes. i set the cruise at a nice 70MPH in these lanes > whenever possible (they're signed at 65MPH) and will let any speedsters past > when legal and possible, though sometimes there's no choice but to wait a > mile or two until the beloved dotted line returns. > > the problem is during PEAK times when traffic is bumper to bumper in teh > non-HOV lanes and going much slower than the sailing HOV traffic. letting > the guy who wants to do 80+ pass can be dang near impossible because that > maneuver usually requries waiting for the lane change zone and then SLAMMING > on the brakes as i cut into the non-restricted lanes. > > this is probably putting too fine a point on it, but you get the picture. > plus the fact that once you're out of the lanes, you've gotta get back IN, > which can be tricky in said traffic, especially if you've used that whole > dotted line zone just to find a slot to get out of the lane. > > i happen to think so. cal drivers are actually *more* courteous and sensible > than the average driver in other areas of the country, contrary to popular > belief. but every so often you get the uber-agressive tailgater types who > will tailgate in the HOV lane with NOWHERE for me to legally get over to let > them pass. > > my solution is usually to use a subtle "ruboff" maneuver of cancelling the > cruise and letting my speed drop from 70 to about 60. and then accelerate > hard back to 70. lather, rinse, repeat as necessary, usually the message is > received with a minimum amount of ire and i avoid the confrontational "brake > tap" warning. and i continue to look for the next possible place to get > over. > > thoughts? > > brink I agree on most points here, but you are about to get several posters telling you that you should be shot for blocking any car at any time. Failing to observe the established 85% speed of 140 mph is a death penalty offense. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
brink wrote:
> just wondering what people's thoughts are on this.... > > in so. cal, the HOV lanes are restricted 24 hrs/day to 2+ occupants. > exiting and entering the lanes are also restricted by solid white lines. > there are dotted exit/entry areas every 1-3 miles that are pretty short > (less than a quarter mile sometimes), especially for the volume, speed > differential of traffic on routes with these lanes (i.e. HOV lanes cruising > at 65-70 MPH while the rest of traffic stuck at less than 40) and bunches of > cars moving in and out at those few allowed lane change points. > > in short, getting in and out of those HOV lanes at peak times can be a > challenge, to say the least. > > anyway, my question is how strictly LLBing protocol should be applied to HOV > lanes in y'all's opinions. People say "y'all" in California? Getting back to the subject, if you're passing traffic with a 30 mph differential, you're not LLBing. If it takes less than 20 seconds to catch up to the next vehicle one lane over to the right, then you don't have to move right. Of course, if you have a lot of people tailgating you, then you should consider driving faster. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Around 5/24/2005 5:53 PM, william lynch wrote:
> Failing to observe the established 85% speed > of 140 mph is a death penalty offense. You really have no idea how the 85th percentile method of establishing safe and sane speed limits works, do you? -- ~/Garth |"I believe that it is better to tell the truth than a lie. Almgren | I believe it is better to be free than to be a slave. ******* | And I believe it is better to know than to be ignorant." for secure mail info) --H.L. Mencken (1880-1956) |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Arif Khokar wrote:
> > brink wrote: > > > just wondering what people's thoughts are on this.... > > > > in so. cal, the HOV lanes are restricted 24 hrs/day to 2+ occupants. > > exiting and entering the lanes are also restricted by solid white lines. > > there are dotted exit/entry areas every 1-3 miles that are pretty short > > (less than a quarter mile sometimes), especially for the volume, speed > > differential of traffic on routes with these lanes (i.e. HOV lanes cruising > > at 65-70 MPH while the rest of traffic stuck at less than 40) and bunches of > > cars moving in and out at those few allowed lane change points. > > > > in short, getting in and out of those HOV lanes at peak times can be a > > challenge, to say the least. > > > > anyway, my question is how strictly LLBing protocol should be applied to HOV > > lanes in y'all's opinions. > > People say "y'all" in California? > > Getting back to the subject, if you're passing traffic with a 30 mph > differential, you're not LLBing. If it takes less than 20 seconds to > catch up to the next vehicle one lane over to the right, then you don't > have to move right. The speed at which you (in the HOV lane) are passing traffic in the remaining lanes is irrelevant to your LLB status. I've only used the HOV lane a couple of times. Both on the 605 and both traveling 65 or 70 when the normal traffic was going perhaps 0-20. It's really scary passing cars that fast -- you never can tell when some desperate soul is going to go over the edge and zip across the double yellow into the HOV lane. Under those circumstances I go as fast as the guy in front of me is going. > Of course, if you have a lot of people tailgating you, then you should > consider driving faster. That's why I usually stick to the right lane. -- Cheers, Bev 0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o 0o0o0o0o0o0o0 Judges are our only protection against a legal system that can afford lots more prosecution than we can afford defense. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
> Garth Almgren wrote:
> > Around 5/24/2005 5:53 PM, william lynch wrote: > > > > Failing to observe the established 85% speed > > of 140 mph is a death penalty offense. > > You really have no idea how the 85th percentile method of establishing > safe and sane speed limits works, do you? I think they call it "sarcasm".... Froggie |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
brink wrote:
> just wondering what people's thoughts are on this.... > > in so. cal, the HOV lanes are restricted 24 hrs/day to 2+ occupants. > exiting and entering the lanes are also restricted by solid white > lines. there are dotted exit/entry areas every 1-3 miles that are > pretty short (less than a quarter mile sometimes), especially for the > volume, speed differential of traffic on routes with these lanes > (i.e. HOV lanes cruising at 65-70 MPH while the rest of traffic stuck > at less than 40) and bunches of cars moving in and out at those few > allowed lane change points. > in short, getting in and out of those HOV lanes at peak times can be a > challenge, to say the least. > > anyway, my question is how strictly LLBing protocol should be applied > to HOV lanes in y'all's opinions. i nearly always drive with a > passenger and thus usually use the HOV lanes. i set the cruise at a > nice 70MPH in these lanes whenever possible (they're signed at 65MPH) > and will let any speedsters past when legal and possible, though > sometimes there's no choice but to wait a mile or two until the > beloved dotted line returns. If the main lanes are congested, the HOV lane(s) are basically a separate roadway. And since in LA most of them are single lane, there can be no LLB by definition. Now, if you weren't going at least the speed limit, (assuming non-congested HOV lane) that would be kinda jerkish. But going 70 mph is fine. If the main lanes are not congested, your speed doesn't really matter, since if you were impeding someone they could easily get into the main lanes to go faster. I was able to drive the SB 405 HOV lanes from LAX to the 5 a couple times last summer when I was there. The main lanes were congested. I drove up to 80 mph when the lane was clear, and when I was behind someone I just left my normal cushion between us. It was sometimes a little frustrating when our platoon was only going 65 mph with clear sailing ahead, but I kept reminding myself that it was MUCH better than averaging 20 mph in the main lanes. So even that wasn't too bad. I would say for you to keep at your 65-70 mph. Don't switch into the main lanes, to let people by, as that could cause more trouble than it's worth. -- Craig Holl Mechanical Engineer; New Berlin, WI www.midwestroads.com *remove all numbers and caps to reply* |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Craig wrote:
"I would say for you to keep at your 65-70 mph. Don't switch into the main lanes, to let people by, as that could cause more trouble than it's worth." Agreed |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Scott-e-A wrote: "Wrong, Carl Taylor. YOU do not get to decide how
fast other drivers should go. YOU need to obey the law and get out of the way of faster traffic, and leave the speed enforcement to the police." This is blatant double-standards, Scott. Surely if Carl does not 'get to decide how fast other drivers should go' then you do not get to decide whether other drivers should pull over. That, too, is the job of the police! Eddie |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Garth Almgren wrote:
> Around 5/24/2005 5:53 PM, william lynch wrote: > >> Failing to observe the established 85% speed >> of 140 mph is a death penalty offense. > > You really have no idea how the 85th percentile method of establishing > safe and sane speed limits works, do you? I have read a number of analyses. But my comment was directed at those here who use the idea as a justification for driving as fast as possible everywhere. For further info look up the dictionary definition of 'sarcasm'. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Sloth turn lane confusion | Alexander Rogge | Driving | 6 | April 29th 05 08:01 AM |
What exactly is "left lane blocking"? | Magnulus | Driving | 406 | April 8th 05 03:49 AM |
I drove in the right lane today | Usual Suspect | Driving | 10 | February 15th 05 02:33 AM |
There I was, Driving in the Right Lane... | Dave Head | Driving | 110 | December 18th 04 02:07 AM |