If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
RSC back up!
|
Ads |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
RSC back up!
>> This is my issue with RSC.
> Step away from the soapbox and think about starving children, soldiers killed in > stupid wars, and trillion dollar bailouts for Wall Street millionaires. > Feel any better now? Obviously this isn't the greatest injustice ever inflicted on a person, but I can still complain. If you had seen all the email I received from RSC moderators, they were turning a molehill into a mountain, so I decided to return the favor. Yes, on a worldly scale, it's a minor injustice, but one that makes a bad world just a bit worse when people like those at RSC decide on their own to unfairly punish their own members. The existance of much greater wrongs doesn't justify a trivial wrong. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
RSC back up!
"Andrew MacPherson" > wrote in message ... > (jeffareid) wrote: > >> This is my issue with RSC. > > Step away from the soapbox and think about starving children, soldiers > killed in > stupid wars, and trillion dollar bailouts for Wall Street millionaires. > > Feel any better now? > > No, I didn't think you would. ;-) > > Andrew McP But this is rec.autos.simulators correct? How about we get to the heart of this matter? Who is put out, hurt financially or in any other way by the posting of that movie? Who is making money from someone else's creation? The entire thing is a load of bull****! Now if we want to go all big picture here, as you suggest, then I would think that applies monumentally more to the idiot moderator and anyone else who would think this to be any legal issue whatsoever. It just goes to show how ****ed up the legal system and its application is that this discussion is even taking place. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
RSC back up!
"David Fisher's Left Testicle" <dfg.myass@aol> wrote in message ... > > "jeffareid" > wrote in message > ... >>> And do I seriously have to agree to the so-called "terms" every time I'm >>> at a new forum for the first time? >> >> < General rule #5: >> < All serious complaints about staff or users should not be >> < publically posted by members. >> >> So non serious complaints about staff are OK then? >> > That's the sort of thing only a **** would do. You have a serious problem. I wonder if you'd talk the same if face-to-face. I doubt it. It's nice and safe to talk like a bigshot when you have the Internet behind which to HIDE. Alan |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
RSC back up!
"David Fisher's Left Testicle" <dfg.myass@aol> wrote in message ... > > "jeffareid" > wrote in message > ... >>>> So non serious complaints about staff are OK then? >> >>> That's the sort of thing only a **** would do. >> >> So does this mean you'll be making non serious complaints >> about staff? >> > You really are a crybaby sometimes. So they gave little you a yellow flag, > big deal! Get over it. Ah ha! He caught you with a little witty remark, and you covered yourself. Alan |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
RSC back up!
> Now if we want to go all big picture here, as you suggest, then I would think that applies monumentally more to the
> idiot moderator and anyone else who would think this to be any legal issue whatsoever. It was only a legal issue in the mind of a RSC moderator. In reality it's not a legal issue until the actual copyright owner makes an claim of ownership and states that the posting of the video is ok as is, or requests the video is ok, but wants it to include credits for the copyright owner (perhaps a link), or to have the video removed. This is how this situation is handled by youtube and other file hosting sites. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
RSC back up!
"Alan Bernardo" > wrote in message ... > > "David Fisher's Left Testicle" <dfg.myass@aol> wrote in message > ... >> >> "jeffareid" > wrote in message >> ... >>>> And do I seriously have to agree to the so-called "terms" every time >>>> I'm at a new forum for the first time? >>> >>> < General rule #5: >>> < All serious complaints about staff or users should not be >>> < publically posted by members. >>> >>> So non serious complaints about staff are OK then? >>> >> That's the sort of thing only a **** would do. > > You have a serious problem. I wonder if you'd talk the same if > face-to-face. > > I doubt it. It's nice and safe to talk like a bigshot when you have the > Internet behind which to HIDE. > Let's meet up then. I'm in the UK. Where are you? |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
RSC back up!
|
#29
|
|||
|
|||
RSC back up!
> As someone 'pirating' music in the movies I've made, I partially agree with you.
> But what I've done is still illegal. Same goes, potentially, in this case. Except in this case the video had been on several other web sites for years, and I asked if I could mirror the video from one of those web sites (which no longer exists and why I asked to mirror the video), and they responded it was OK. This is different than using some file sharing or torrent program to download music that was never intended to publicy available in the first place. Everyone involved in the original discussion, except for RSC, agreed that that no one was going to file an infrignement claim or ask for removal this particula video, since the video was old (at least 3 years at the time), and on several fan oriented web sites. Note that there's no requirement for pre-emptive prevention of such videos being posted, as demonstated by youtube. They aren't held responsible for uploaded content until contacted by an entity claiming to own the rights to the video. At this point, they are given reasonable time to contact the original uploader to see if he contests the copyright claim. The original uploader is given the chance to dispute the claim, in which case the video remains, or the uploader can delete the video. If the uploader doesn't respond, the video is removed. If repeated infringements occur, the copyright owner will ask youtube to pre-emptively remove uploads with certain key words in the desciptions. Youtube has no ability to screen the actual video content with some sort of AI viewer. The same video with out the key words will probably never get detected (but never seen by many either). |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
RSC back up!
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Back To Back GT vs V6 Test Drive....... | Cobra Boy | Ford Mustang | 1 | July 5th 06 04:01 AM |
one more urban grocers in back of the outer navel were recommending in back of the long camp | Cypriene | Corvette | 0 | January 20th 05 12:43 PM |
[GTRank] Back-to-Back function added | Uwe Schürkamp | Simulators | 2 | December 20th 04 10:39 AM |