A Cars forum. AutoBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AutoBanter forum » Auto newsgroups » Technology
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Why is Slick 50 still in business?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 23rd 05, 10:12 AM
Doc
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Why is Slick 50 still in business?

They've been sued by DuPont, had their asses slapped by the FTC for their
snake-oil claims, been outed for marketing a product that has no genuine
benefits and can actually damage an engine, so how do they manage to stay in
business, still making essentially the same claims?


Ads
  #2  
Old August 23rd 05, 02:48 PM
John S.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Doc wrote:
> They've been sued by DuPont, had their asses slapped by the FTC for their
> snake-oil claims, been outed for marketing a product that has no genuine
> benefits and can actually damage an engine, so how do they manage to stay in
> business, still making essentially the same claims?


Don't know much about Slick 50, but it sure sounds like it could be
slick.

I've worked on cars long enough to know there is money to be made from
peddling cans of goop to: make engine engine oil slippery, enhance
transmission fluid, condition power steering fluid, stabilize gasoline,
clean fuel injectors, improve fuel economy, improve engine performance,
and plug a leaky cooling system. In my experience most of the products
do no harm, and that's a good thing.

  #3  
Old August 23rd 05, 03:04 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The FTC hammered them because they made claims which they had not tested
adequately and for which they
had no proof, if I remember correctly. The FTC didnt come out and say the
product was trash, just that the
marketing was deceptive and misleading.

http://neptune.spacebears.com/cars/legal/s50fcn.html

As far as I know, DuPont never sued Blue Coral Slick 50. I spoke with
DuPont in those years about
an alternate use of micronized PTFE which they were glad to investigate, and
during the conversation
they told me that they were not happy with some of the claims Slick 50 had
made. (Prophetic, no?)

My application for micronized PTFE was better served by another chemistry
and was not taken further.


  #4  
Old August 23rd 05, 06:36 PM
Marco Licetti
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

What about Anal Care Kits?


  #5  
Old August 23rd 05, 07:04 PM
John S.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Marco Licetti wrote:
> What about Anal Care Kits?


?????????????????

  #6  
Old August 23rd 05, 07:11 PM
Daniel J. Stern
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


They're still in business because nobody *ever* lost money marketing to
ignorant idiots and gullible fools. Since there are so many of both, it's
a large market. Since logic and science haven't been effectively taught in
the US for several decades now, it's also a growth market.
  #7  
Old August 23rd 05, 08:04 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Daniel J. Stern" > wrote in message
.umich.edu...
>
> They're still in business because nobody *ever* lost money marketing to
> ignorant idiots and gullible fools. Since there are so many of both, it's
> a large market. Since logic and science haven't been effectively taught in
> the US for several decades now, it's also a growth market.


Did not Quaker State buy the rights to market Slick 50? A change of
ownership
seems to have 'purified' the product.


  #8  
Old August 23rd 05, 09:12 PM
Pete C.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Daniel J. Stern" wrote:
>
> They're still in business because nobody *ever* lost money marketing to
> ignorant idiots and gullible fools. Since there are so many of both, it's
> a large market. Since logic and science haven't been effectively taught in
> the US for several decades now, it's also a growth market.


Two absolutely true educational horrors from a friend of mine who is a
technology teacher currently at a "magnet" school for talented / gifted
students.

Horror #1: One student had absolutely no idea how to use a ruler. This
was a teenager too, not a 5yr old.

Horror #2: A group of students in an intro robotics class was given a
socket wrench set to use in the assembly of components. Not a single
student in the group knew how to use a socket wrench.

With "talented and gifted" students like that the future of this country
is very bleak...

Pete C.
  #9  
Old August 23rd 05, 10:55 PM
John S.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Pete C. wrote:
> "Daniel J. Stern" wrote:
> >
> > They're still in business because nobody *ever* lost money marketing to
> > ignorant idiots and gullible fools. Since there are so many of both, it's
> > a large market. Since logic and science haven't been effectively taught in
> > the US for several decades now, it's also a growth market.

>
> Two absolutely true educational horrors from a friend of mine who is a
> technology teacher currently at a "magnet" school for talented / gifted
> students.
>
> Horror #1: One student had absolutely no idea how to use a ruler. This
> was a teenager too, not a 5yr old.


That is apalling - his parents should have taught that basic household
skill.

>
> Horror #2: A group of students in an intro robotics class was given a
> socket wrench set to use in the assembly of components. Not a single
> student in the group knew how to use a socket wrench.


Not surprising given the way that shop and other trade related courses
are taught in classrooms away from the main high school campus for
potential dropouts and other problem students. Most kids are actively
discouraged from shop classes when many of those skills would be very
useful in daily life. Not to mention a career.

Much as I hate to start a discussion like this, when I was in high
school, boys were encouraged to take some shop classes even if they
were college bound. I'm proud to say I took at least one semester of
every shop class and went a lot further in auto and machine shop. It
meant some summer school, but it was worth it imho.

>
> With "talented and gifted" students like that the future of this country
> is very bleak...


Someone is gonna pick up those jobs, but I really dislike the
condescending attitude of many teachers and school administrators
towards trade related schooling. A good automotive tech is highly
skilled and trained person these days.

>
> Pete C.


  #10  
Old August 24th 05, 02:23 AM
Pete C.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"John S." wrote:
>
> Pete C. wrote:
> > "Daniel J. Stern" wrote:
> > >
> > > They're still in business because nobody *ever* lost money marketing to
> > > ignorant idiots and gullible fools. Since there are so many of both, it's
> > > a large market. Since logic and science haven't been effectively taught in
> > > the US for several decades now, it's also a growth market.

> >
> > Two absolutely true educational horrors from a friend of mine who is a
> > technology teacher currently at a "magnet" school for talented / gifted
> > students.
> >
> > Horror #1: One student had absolutely no idea how to use a ruler. This
> > was a teenager too, not a 5yr old.

>
> That is apalling - his parents should have taught that basic household
> skill.


I thought you learned how to use a ruler in the 1st grade at the latest.

>
> >
> > Horror #2: A group of students in an intro robotics class was given a
> > socket wrench set to use in the assembly of components. Not a single
> > student in the group knew how to use a socket wrench.

>
> Not surprising given the way that shop and other trade related courses
> are taught in classrooms away from the main high school campus for
> potential dropouts and other problem students. Most kids are actively
> discouraged from shop classes when many of those skills would be very
> useful in daily life. Not to mention a career.


Absolutely inexcusable the way schools try to steer kids away from
skills / careers that are not "in". Many kids would would otherwise have
a very rewarding career end up pushed towards something they don't like,
aren't good at and may ultimately fail at.

As for socket wrenches, not only is it the loss of shop class in the
schools, it's also the lack of those skills in their parents. It used to
be that your dad would change the oil on the family cars and do other
basic maintenance and you'd pick up some of the mechanical skills that
way. Now most of the parents don't even know how to check the oil in
their car, much less change it.

>
> Much as I hate to start a discussion like this, when I was in high
> school, boys were encouraged to take some shop classes even if they
> were college bound. I'm proud to say I took at least one semester of
> every shop class and went a lot further in auto and machine shop. It
> meant some summer school, but it was worth it imho.


I'm probably a bit younger, but not that much as shop class did still
exist when I was in school. Unfortunately I never really had the
opportunity to take shop class as I was fairly talented in other areas
and was somewhat steered in that direction. Fortunately though I was
never one to yield to any kind of pressure (peer, parent, teacher, etc.)
so that didn't stop my interest in things mechanical.

My father although I didn't get along with him very well, worked at Colt
Firearms doing machining / setup for machine operators so I was able to
get some machining exposure that way. I've since built up a halfway
decent shop myself and treat every project / repair opportunity as an
excuse to add more tools. I've taken a few evening classes at local tech
schools to add to / improve my skills in various areas and enjoyed them
quite a bit.

My feeling is that all students regardless of sex, need to take both a
shop type class and a home-ec. type class as skills in both those areas
seem to be desperately needed today.

>
> >
> > With "talented and gifted" students like that the future of this country
> > is very bleak...

>
> Someone is gonna pick up those jobs, but I really dislike the
> condescending attitude of many teachers and school administrators
> towards trade related schooling. A good automotive tech is highly
> skilled and trained person these days.


Absolutely and we seem to be importing people to do those jobs. A good
automotive tech is indeed highly skilled and trained and they sure seem
to be in short supply based on what I've seen in a number of car dealer
and other commercial shops. Examples such as the tech who forgot to put
the bolts back in the center bearing carrier on the drive shaft on my
truck after clutch work, or the folks at two different tire places who
didn't comprehend hub piloted wheels or torquing sequences and put
wheels on my truck crooked.

Pete C.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Slick 50 - FROM THE BEGINNING? Rebecca Webb Technology 53 March 24th 05 03:30 PM
WANT TO BUT A SPYDER......? Bagger Chrysler 0 January 13th 05 07:22 PM
New *FREE* Corvette Discussion Forum JLA ENTERPRISES TECHNOLOGIES INTEGRATION Corvette 12 November 30th 04 07:36 PM
Turn-key business opportunity with unlimited income potential! delhelt Dodge 0 October 16th 04 11:33 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AutoBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.