If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
2009 Audi A4 ?
On Sun, 30 Nov 2008 13:01:44 +0100, Wolfgang Pawlinetz
> wrote: >Dave, I respect you're experience and opinion, but I will have to >refuse the implication that people not buying a Q for their own >reasons are cheapskates or making false decisions. > >For the record: I don't doubt that the Q is better than the FWD, but >the F is by any means still an extremely good car. Wolfgang, I don't think people are cheapskates for buying the fwd Audis, but I do feel that the entire reason for buying an Audi is the Quattro system. Audi didn't make their money on fwd cars. When they came out with the Quattro here in the states (82, 84?) their sales began to rise. There are scores of fwd cars out there, many of them good, but there is only one Quattro along with numerous other awd systems that are inferior. I would venture a guess that Quattro accounts for 98% of sales in the U.S. Audi dominated the rally scene in Europe and the States during in the 80s because of Quattro. Their entry into racing was also very successful. I believe they dominated much of the Euro racing in those days and each win caused them a weight penalty. The Sports Car Club of America (SCCA) would not allow Quattros in any of their race classes because of the distinct advantage over rwd and fwd. Audi and their Quattro have dominated any number of race scenes, but especially LeMans in recent years, and the Petite LeMans series here in the States. I have driven many fwd Audis at Audi sponsored driving events and they do not compare to Quattro. They are good cars, no doubt about that, but my choice for any car would be Quattro or rwd. If Audi was suddenly to stop production of Quattro, my next choice would be the Nisson GT-R or one of the MBs AMGs. It would not be an Audi fwd. And, I agree with you that the Audi fwd is an extremely good car. Be well, Dave RS6 |
Ads |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
2009 Audi A4 ?
"Dave LaCourse" > wrote in message ... > On Sun, 30 Nov 2008 13:01:44 +0100, Wolfgang Pawlinetz > > wrote: > >>Dave, I respect you're experience and opinion, but I will have to >>refuse the implication that people not buying a Q for their own >>reasons are cheapskates or making false decisions. >> >>For the record: I don't doubt that the Q is better than the FWD, but >>the F is by any means still an extremely good car. > > Wolfgang, I don't think people are cheapskates for buying the fwd > Audis, but I do feel that the entire reason for buying an Audi is the > Quattro system. Audi didn't make their money on fwd cars. When they > came out with the Quattro here in the states (82, 84?) their sales > began to rise. There are scores of fwd cars out there, many of them > good, but there is only one Quattro along with numerous other awd > systems that are inferior. I would venture a guess that Quattro > accounts for 98% of sales in the U.S. > > Audi dominated the rally scene in Europe and the States during in the > 80s because of Quattro. Their entry into racing was also very > successful. I believe they dominated much of the Euro racing in those > days and each win caused them a weight penalty. The Sports Car Club > of America (SCCA) would not allow Quattros in any of their race > classes because of the distinct advantage over rwd and fwd. Audi and > their Quattro have dominated any number of race scenes, but especially > LeMans in recent years, and the Petite LeMans series here in the > States. > > I have driven many fwd Audis at Audi sponsored driving events and they > do not compare to Quattro. They are good cars, no doubt about that, > but my choice for any car would be Quattro or rwd. If Audi was > suddenly to stop production of Quattro, my next choice would be the > Nisson GT-R or one of the MBs AMGs. It would not be an Audi fwd. > And, I agree with you that the Audi fwd is an extremely good car. > > Be well, > > Dave > RS6 > > There are at least two types of Quattro system. The longitudinal engine in an A4 A5 A6 A8 S4 S6 (et cetera) has Torsen full time 4wd, whereas the transverse engine in the A3 S3 TT (et cetera) has the Haldex electronic controlled clutch system which is not full time 4wd, but front wheel drive most of the time. Best regards David |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
2009 Audi A4 ?
On Sun, 30 Nov 2008 07:36:36 -0500, Dave LaCourse
> wrote: >Wolfgang, I don't think people are cheapskates for buying the fwd >Audis, but I do feel that the entire reason for buying an Audi is the >Quattro system. Audi didn't make their money on fwd cars. When they >came out with the Quattro here in the states (82, 84?) their sales >began to rise. There are scores of fwd cars out there, many of them >good, but there is only one Quattro along with numerous other awd >systems that are inferior. I would venture a guess that Quattro >accounts for 98% of sales in the U.S. I begin to understand the different preception now. I just checked Audis used car website in Austria and of all Audis currently offered there (~3600 units) ~ 1200 are Quattros. All others are obviously Fronts. Audis had a fairly good reputation in europe already long before they increased their sales in the US, so we have a different perception. In the premium class over here basically only Mercedes, BMW and Audi dominate. Lexus here has a very hard time to even be acknowledged as a high class car (Lexus owners: no offense) >[Racing and Competition] I agree, but one could also see that as an excellent marketing plot because, and let me play the devils advcate now, for the daily commute on the motorway in california (BTDT) you don't need a Q. I understand and agree that the reason for their big success in competition conditions is the quattro. However, I assume you've made the same experience, that is between racetrack and daily real world driving complete universes exists. >Be well, You too, Dave Regards Wolfgang |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
2009 Audi A4 ?
On Sun, 30 Nov 2008 14:55:19 +0100, Wolfgang Pawlinetz
> wrote: >I just checked Audis used car website in Austria and of all Audis >currently offered there (~3600 units) ~ 1200 are Quattros. All others >are obviously Fronts. I can believe that. It is just the opposite here in the States. Most Audis are awd, except for some of the TTs. I only wish that we had some of the speed limits that you have, and the lane discipline most Euro drivers practice. My wife and I were in Switzerland about ten years ago and had rented a Saab Turbo in Zurich. Had a blast driving to Davos and then to Germany. If only Stateside drivers had that discipline. > >Audis had a fairly good reputation in europe already long before they >increased their sales in the US, so we have a different perception. In >the premium class over here basically only Mercedes, BMW and Audi >dominate. Lexus here has a very hard time to even be acknowledged as a >high class car (Lexus owners: no offense) d;o) My wife has a Lexus SUV. Nice enough, but when I sponsored the family to a winter driving school last year (two daughters and their husbands (2000 4.2 A6), three grandchildren (two 2000 S4s and a Passat), no one wanted to drive her car. We took turns, of course, with each of the cars, but no one wanted to drive the Lexus. It was fun throwing the Audis around the different courses, but the Lexus was so forgiving with its anti-skid control, that it was hard to get it into trouble. You can turn it off on the RS6, and the others didn't have one. I had the Lexus in for service several months ago and took that opportunity to test drive the Lexus IS F sedan. Ballsey little all-wheel drive with 416 bhp, but it wasn't an Audi. A Lexus is NOT a MB, but it does well in the States. Be well, Dave RS6 |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
2009 Audi A4 ?
> but I do feel that the entire reason for buying an Audi is the
> Quattro system I would have loved a Quattro but as has been said, the price difference was too much. It would have meant I'd have had to drop options (leather, HIDs) that I wanted. My main reasons for buying an Audi were superior quality over anything in the same price segment, better residual value when I come to sell and IMO better aesthetics. Only around 25% of Audis sold in Europe are Quattro because pretty much all Audis sold in Europe are built to order. I appreciate that that's hard to do outside Europe which is why Audi USA probably takes in a far higher percentage of Quattros as it's the USP for many people. You've also got to remember that Audi only came up with Quattro in the early 80s but were pretty successful in Europe long before that so the "need" for Quattro is not so strong here. Dave |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
2009 Audi A4 ?
On Mon, 1 Dec 2008 09:53:07 -0000, "Dave" > wrote:
>Only around 25% of Audis sold in Europe are Quattro because pretty much all >Audis sold in Europe are built to order. I appreciate that that's hard to do >outside Europe which is why Audi USA probably takes in a far higher >percentage of Quattros as it's the USP for many people. > >You've also got to remember that Audi only came up with Quattro in the early >80s but were pretty successful in Europe long before that so the "need" for >Quattro is not so strong here. Interesting. I would have thought that most Audis are Quattro because of their history here in the States. I remember the Audi Fox of many years ago and I don't believe it sold well in the U.S. Audi sales started to take off when they offered their first awd in '83 (82?). I was invited to participate in an Audi "Hands On" demonstration in Boston in '86 (or what it '88?). Anyway, they had their 200 and 400 models with ABS. You could turn the ABS off, and we did exercises with and without. First impressions count, and I just had to have an Audi with ABS. Sales of Audis increased after they came out with ABS, and then the "sudden-unintended-acceleration) fiasco happened, and sales suffered. Audi is now quite popular here in New England. Expensive, but well built, bullet proof Quattro, and good performance. I've owned my RS6 since new ('03), the longest I have ever owned a car, and have no intention of getting rid of it. It has Bilsteins coil-overs on all four corners, 19 " BBS LMs, lowered, chipped to 512 bhp, and goes like stink. It has given me flawless performance since day one. Dave RS6 |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
2009 Audi A4 ?
Something else to consider here in Europe is the high price of fuel. Having
a Quattro will dent your MPG. I test drove an A4 2.0TDI 170 Quattro which had very good performance but only gave 32MPG (UK)! You may as well buy a petrol car with that sort of consumption. Although I have heard of the recent 3.0TDI Quattros returning nearer 40. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
2009 Audi A4 Sedan - red - fvl | Paddy's Pig[_2_] | Auto Photos | 1 | October 4th 08 08:49 AM |
2009 Audi A4-wht-rVr=mx=.jpg (1/1) 41733 bytes | [email protected] | Old Timers Photos | 0 | January 19th 08 10:52 AM |
2009 Audi A4-red-fVl=mx=.jpg (1/1) 57311 bytes | [email protected] | Old Timers Photos | 0 | January 19th 08 10:52 AM |
2009 Audi A4-wht-rVr=mx=.jpg (1/1) 41733 bytes | [email protected] | Auto Photos | 0 | January 19th 08 09:59 AM |
2009 Audi A4-red-fVl=mx=.jpg (1/1) 57311 bytes | [email protected] | Auto Photos | 0 | January 19th 08 09:59 AM |