Operation Distance Chart: Pause!

On Mar 29, 10:33*pm, "US 71" > wrote:
> "H.B. Elkins" > wrote
>
>
>
> > How can only one person be a community, Turdburglar? There is only one known
> > viatologist in the world, everyone else is too intelligent to associate with
> > the
> > likes of him.
>
> ALMOST everyone else. Sounds like Skippy there is an admirer

Assuming that the Skipper isn't a secret entry by EriQaeda. :P

On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 22:33:34 -0500, US 71 wrote:

> "H.B. Elkins" > wrote
>
>
>> How can only one person be a community, Turdburglar? There is only one
>> known viatologist in the world, everyone else is too intelligent to
>> associate with the
>> likes of him.
>>
>>
> ALMOST everyone else. Sounds like Skippy there is an admirer

Like many people who are way ahead of their time, Mr Rogers has to suffer
the torments of jealous peers and he suffers those torments with dignity.
What isn't there to admire about a person who continues his chosen
scientific research in spite of almost universal condemnation?

"Skip Turdlington" > wrote in message
...
> On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 22:33:34 -0500, US 71 wrote:
>
>> "H.B. Elkins" > wrote
>>
>>
>>> How can only one person be a community, Turdburglar? There is only one
>>> known viatologist in the world, everyone else is too intelligent to
>>> associate with the
>>> likes of him.
>>>
>>>
>> ALMOST everyone else. Sounds like Skippy there is an admirer
>
> Like many people who are way ahead of their time, Mr Rogers has to suffer
> the torments of jealous peers and he suffers those torments with dignity.
> What isn't there to admire about a person who continues his chosen
> scientific research in spite of almost universal condemnation?

Since Carl refuses to answer maybe you can -

What scientific method is being utilized in the aforementioned research?
What data is being collected scientifically? What analysis is being applied
to said data? How is said data being accumulated?


--
Don't forget to have your troll spayed or neutered

On Wed, 31 Mar 2010 05:43:46 GMT, Skip Turdlington wrote:

>Like many people who are way ahead of their time, Mr Rogers has to suffer
>the torments of jealous peers and he suffers those torments with dignity.
>What isn't there to admire about a person who continues his chosen
>scientific research in spite of almost universal condemnation?

There are a whole lot of us who do the same thing as Mr. Rogers, only better and
without the pretentiousness and braggadocio that he exhibits. We aren't
delusional enough to think that what we're doing is some new science and that we
are engaging in scientific research.

Of course I'm probably arguing with one of Carl's sock puppets, which is
probably a violation of OSTT, so I guess I'll stop now.


--
To reply by e-mail, remove the "restrictor plate"

On Mar 29, 12:40*am, Skip Turdlington > wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 19:37:15 -0700, Carl Rogers wrote:
> > Hi Viatologists,
>
> > Operation Distance Chart is currently on hold as I tend to a couple
> > family emergencies. *Will return in the future -- the project completion
> > may be pushed to 2012.
>
> The viatological community wishes you a very speedy return to
> the science. Viatologists everywhere will be counting the days until then..


That's you, Carl, and who else Turd Burglar?

On Wed, 31 Mar 2010 08:20:27 -0700, H.B. Elkins wrote:

> On Wed, 31 Mar 2010 05:43:46 GMT, Skip Turdlington wrote:
>
>>Like many people who are way ahead of their time, Mr Rogers has to
>>suffer the torments of jealous peers and he suffers those torments with
>>dignity. What isn't there to admire about a person who continues his
>>chosen scientific research in spite of almost universal condemnation?
>


> There are a whole lot of us who do the same thing as Mr. Rogers, only
> better and without the pretentiousness and braggadocio that he exhibits.
> We aren't delusional enough to think that what we're doing is some new
> science and that we are engaging in scientific research.
>

This is the very point. You and your kind remind me of the Paris Salon in
late 19th century. Then, the established arbiters of artistic values (the
Salon jurists) rejected and dismissed impressionist works out of hand.
Boy did they get that wrong.

Viatology is not just a scientific framework for understanding
transportation technology, it also has a cultural context. It is the
cultural context which distinquishes Viatology
from the torrent of undifferentiated junk which regurgitates out of
countless road fanboi galleries.

It matters little that the resolution might be higher on another site, or
that another site might have a "better" navigaton system. Simply, WWTL
is art.

> Of course I'm probably arguing with one of Carl's sock puppets, which is
> probably a violation of OSTT, so I guess I'll stop now.

I don't know the man, so I can hardly be a sock puppet. I am just a
person who appreciates art. I am sure that web archive curators will
ensure that WWTL becomes a future national treasure.

On Thu, 01 Apr 2010 02:53:19 GMT, Skip Turdlington wrote:

>I don't know the man, so I can hardly be a sock puppet. I am just a
>person who appreciates art. I am sure that web archive curators will
>ensure that WWTL becomes a future national treasure.

So is it an art or is it a science, now? Make up your mind.


--
To reply by e-mail, remove the "restrictor plate"

On Thu, 01 Apr 2010 02:53:19 +0000, Skip Turdlington wrote:

> It matters little that the resolution might be higher on another site,
> or that another site might have a "better" navigaton system. Simply,
> WWTL is art.

That's gotta be one of the funniest things I've read on here in some
time. 'It doesn't suck: it's "art"!"



--
Otto Yamamoto

On 01 Apr 2010 04:13:07 GMT, Otto Yamamoto wrote:

> On Thu, 01 Apr 2010 02:53:19 +0000, Skip Turdlington wrote:
>
>> It matters little that the resolution might be higher on another site,
>> or that another site might have a "better" navigaton system. Simply,
>> WWTL is art.
>
> That's gotta be one of the funniest things I've read on here in some
> time. 'It doesn't suck: it's "art"!"

Hey, people have made millions because they called it "art".
I may not know how to define art, but I sure as hell know what isn't.

"Skip Turdlington" > wrote in message
...
>
> Viatology is not just a scientific framework for understanding
> transportation technology, it also has a cultural context. It is the
> cultural context which distinquishes Viatology
> from the torrent of undifferentiated junk which regurgitates out of
> countless road fanboi galleries.

A 39 word paragraph that says absolutely nothing to answer the question. In
other words - a pile of fecal material

--
Don't forget to have your troll spayed or neutered