If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Brief "survey". Has Honda lost its way?
Fellow newsgroup citizens, we used to be a (nearly) all Honda family - 3
Hondas and 1 classic VW Beetle (1965). On our earlier Hondas I replaced timing belts, entire engines, and some other parts myself. Now, however, the 2 remaining Honda cars I and my in-laws have seem to reflect a company that has lost its way. Since these are 2002 and 2003 Models (Civic and Accord, respectively) I wanted to get some feedback as to whether things have gotten back on track. Here are my observations based on the 2 Hondas we have: 1) there seem to be some design weaknesses which are common across the platforms. Maybe while trying to be light weight (and less expensive?) they made things less durable. One example is the steering rack. Both cars had to have the rack replaced (Accord at 90k miles and Civic and 134k miles). Both developed oil leaks that took about $600 to track down/fix - oil pump seals, oil pan seal, and some things on top of the motor even though when the timing belt was replaced all seals, including valve cover seal were replace by the dealer. 2) The Hondas are even less easy to work on yourself. The oil filter is very hard to reach. On Civics there is very little room for standard wrenches if you want to do engine work. I compared that with Hyundai cars where the Hyundai frames even have indentations which coincide with where your hand would travel when turning a wrench when replacing a timing belt, oil filter is down low where it is easy to reach, etc. 3) The parts are expensive and the engineering is a bit too complex (so more things to go wrong). From what I have heard from some Toyota owners that brand seems to have also lost its way and has been cutting corners on part/design quality to keep costs down. So do you folks think that the current (newer) crop of Hondas have found their stride and are again great cars or are they not as great as they used to be in the '80's and '90's? Thanks! --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: --- |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Brief "survey". Has Honda lost its way?
On 12/31/12 9:31 AM, KWW wrote:
> Fellow newsgroup citizens, we used to be a (nearly) all Honda family - 3 > Hondas and 1 classic VW Beetle (1965). On our earlier Hondas I replaced > timing belts, entire engines, and some other parts myself. Now, however, > the 2 remaining Honda cars I and my in-laws have seem to reflect a > company that has lost its way. Since these are 2002 and 2003 Models > (Civic and Accord, respectively) I wanted to get some feedback as to > whether things have gotten back on track. Here are my observations > based on the 2 Hondas we have: > > 1) there seem to be some design weaknesses which are common across the > platforms. Maybe while trying to be light weight (and less expensive?) > they made things less durable. One example is the steering rack. Both > cars had to have the rack replaced (Accord at 90k miles and Civic and > 134k miles). Both developed oil leaks that took about $600 to track > down/fix - oil pump seals, oil pan seal, and some things on top of the > motor even though when the timing belt was replaced all seals, including > valve cover seal were replace by the dealer. > > 2) The Hondas are even less easy to work on yourself. The oil filter is > very hard to reach. On Civics there is very little room for standard > wrenches if you want to do engine work. I compared that with Hyundai > cars where the Hyundai frames even have indentations which coincide with > where your hand would travel when turning a wrench when replacing a > timing belt, oil filter is down low where it is easy to reach, etc. > > 3) The parts are expensive and the engineering is a bit too complex (so > more things to go wrong). > > From what I have heard from some Toyota owners that brand seems to have > also lost its way and has been cutting corners on part/design quality to > keep costs down. So do you folks think that the current (newer) crop of > Hondas have found their stride and are again great cars or are they not > as great as they used to be in the '80's and '90's? > > Thanks! > Yes, that's definitely a good way to determine what's really going on!! Just go ahead and ask the 35-40 or so folks who post here for their opinion-- rather that look at the Consumer Reports detailed automotive reliability survey with hundreds of thousands of responses classified and analyzed by professional statisticians. Yup, good post dude. -- We have a spending problem, not a failure to raise taxes problem. --Grover Norquist |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Brief "survey". Has Honda lost its way?
"KWW" wrote in message ... Fellow newsgroup citizens, we used to be a (nearly) all Honda family - 3 Hondas and 1 classic VW Beetle (1965). On our earlier Hondas I replaced timing belts, entire engines, and some other parts myself. Now, however, the 2 remaining Honda cars I and my in-laws have seem to reflect a company that has lost its way. Since these are 2002 and 2003 Models (Civic and Accord, respectively) I wanted to get some feedback as to whether things have gotten back on track. Here are my observations based on the 2 Hondas we have: 1) there seem to be some design weaknesses which are common across the platforms. Maybe while trying to be light weight (and less expensive?) they made things less durable. One example is the steering rack. Both cars had to have the rack replaced (Accord at 90k miles and Civic and 134k miles). Both developed oil leaks that took about $600 to track down/fix - oil pump seals, oil pan seal, and some things on top of the motor even though when the timing belt was replaced all seals, including valve cover seal were replace by the dealer. 2) The Hondas are even less easy to work on yourself. The oil filter is very hard to reach. On Civics there is very little room for standard wrenches if you want to do engine work. I compared that with Hyundai cars where the Hyundai frames even have indentations which coincide with where your hand would travel when turning a wrench when replacing a timing belt, oil filter is down low where it is easy to reach, etc. 3) The parts are expensive and the engineering is a bit too complex (so more things to go wrong). From what I have heard from some Toyota owners that brand seems to have also lost its way and has been cutting corners on part/design quality to keep costs down. So do you folks think that the current (newer) crop of Hondas have found their stride and are again great cars or are they not as great as they used to be in the '80's and '90's? Thanks! --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: --- In general, I think the consensus will be that Honda is not the company that it was in the past when the "old man" was still around. For my part, I would say the 01 Prelude I had was a great car and the 05 S2000 I now represents the best of the Honda. We have had no problems with an I4 06 Accord coupe which is now at 100k miles or the 09 CRV with 63k. So, our experience with Honda is pretty decent. Honda has had some negatives with their recent models -- the Civic for example. Honda apparently, has recognized this and has made several changes which improve the car. Hyundai and Kia have produced really decent cars, but locally I would not buy them because of the dealership's involved. But, I am just not in the market anyway. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Brief "survey". Has Honda lost its way?
Sir. I may look at Edmunds, KBB, and some other places, however as to
the other sources, I USED to be a member of Consum Rpts until I received their detailed auto survey. I had an automobile that had some real design issues and I discovered that the questions in their survey were so poorly written that the various issues which my car had would be diluted over a number of categories depending upon how I or others felt they were best categorized. In addition, it never hurts to have additional data points. I was not trolling this group by asking my question. I genuinely was hoping for additional anecdotal information in hopes that I might confirm that the issues I was observing were in fact indicative of a previous generation of Hondas but that they had been remedied in subsequent ones. Yes one has to sift through the results but some trends might have emerged which I could then try to correlate against either the aforementioned media sources or directly with a service writer friend at a dealership. Oh well, happy new year! On 12/31/2012 9:01 AM, Douglas C. Neidermeyer wrote: > On 12/31/12 9:31 AM, KWW wrote: >> Fellow newsgroup citizens, we used to be a (nearly) all Honda family - 3 >> Hondas and 1 classic VW Beetle (1965). On our earlier Hondas I replaced >> timing belts, entire engines, and some other parts myself. Now, however, >> the 2 remaining Honda cars I and my in-laws have seem to reflect a >> company that has lost its way. Since these are 2002 and 2003 Models >> (Civic and Accord, respectively) I wanted to get some feedback as to >> whether things have gotten back on track. Here are my observations >> based on the 2 Hondas we have: >> >> 1) there seem to be some design weaknesses which are common across the >> platforms. Maybe while trying to be light weight (and less expensive?) >> they made things less durable. One example is the steering rack. Both >> cars had to have the rack replaced (Accord at 90k miles and Civic and >> 134k miles). Both developed oil leaks that took about $600 to track >> down/fix - oil pump seals, oil pan seal, and some things on top of the >> motor even though when the timing belt was replaced all seals, including >> valve cover seal were replace by the dealer. >> >> 2) The Hondas are even less easy to work on yourself. The oil filter is >> very hard to reach. On Civics there is very little room for standard >> wrenches if you want to do engine work. I compared that with Hyundai >> cars where the Hyundai frames even have indentations which coincide with >> where your hand would travel when turning a wrench when replacing a >> timing belt, oil filter is down low where it is easy to reach, etc. >> >> 3) The parts are expensive and the engineering is a bit too complex (so >> more things to go wrong). >> >> From what I have heard from some Toyota owners that brand seems to have >> also lost its way and has been cutting corners on part/design quality to >> keep costs down. So do you folks think that the current (newer) crop of >> Hondas have found their stride and are again great cars or are they not >> as great as they used to be in the '80's and '90's? >> >> Thanks! >> > > > Yes, that's definitely a good way to determine what's really going on!! > > Just go ahead and ask the 35-40 or so folks who post here for their > opinion-- rather that look at the Consumer Reports detailed automotive > reliability survey with hundreds of thousands of responses classified > and analyzed by professional statisticians. > > Yup, good post dude. > > --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: --- |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Brief "survey". Has Honda lost its way?
On 1/1/13 7:57 AM, KWW wrote:
> > On 12/31/2012 9:01 AM, Douglas C. Neidermeyer wrote: >> On 12/31/12 9:31 AM, KWW wrote: >>> Fellow newsgroup citizens, we used to be a (nearly) all Honda family - 3 >>> Hondas and 1 classic VW Beetle (1965). On our earlier Hondas I replaced >>> timing belts, entire engines, and some other parts myself. Now, however, >>> the 2 remaining Honda cars I and my in-laws have seem to reflect a >>> company that has lost its way. Since these are 2002 and 2003 Models >>> (Civic and Accord, respectively) I wanted to get some feedback as to >>> whether things have gotten back on track. Here are my observations >>> based on the 2 Hondas we have: >>> >>> 1) there seem to be some design weaknesses which are common across the >>> platforms. Maybe while trying to be light weight (and less expensive?) >>> they made things less durable. One example is the steering rack. Both >>> cars had to have the rack replaced (Accord at 90k miles and Civic and >>> 134k miles). Both developed oil leaks that took about $600 to track >>> down/fix - oil pump seals, oil pan seal, and some things on top of the >>> motor even though when the timing belt was replaced all seals, including >>> valve cover seal were replace by the dealer. >>> >>> 2) The Hondas are even less easy to work on yourself. The oil filter is >>> very hard to reach. On Civics there is very little room for standard >>> wrenches if you want to do engine work. I compared that with Hyundai >>> cars where the Hyundai frames even have indentations which coincide with >>> where your hand would travel when turning a wrench when replacing a >>> timing belt, oil filter is down low where it is easy to reach, etc. >>> >>> 3) The parts are expensive and the engineering is a bit too complex (so >>> more things to go wrong). >>> >>> From what I have heard from some Toyota owners that brand seems to have >>> also lost its way and has been cutting corners on part/design quality to >>> keep costs down. So do you folks think that the current (newer) crop of >>> Hondas have found their stride and are again great cars or are they not >>> as great as they used to be in the '80's and '90's? >>> >>> Thanks! >>> >> >> >> Yes, that's definitely a good way to determine what's really going on!! >> >> Just go ahead and ask the 35-40 or so folks who post here for their >> opinion-- rather that look at the Consumer Reports detailed automotive >> reliability survey with hundreds of thousands of responses classified >> and analyzed by professional statisticians. >> >> Yup, good post dude. >> >> > > > --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: --- ///TOP POST RELOCATED/// > Sir. I may look at Edmunds, KBB, and some other places, however as to > the other sources, I USED to be a member of Consum Rpts until I received > their detailed auto survey. I had an automobile that had some real > design issues and I discovered that the questions in their survey were > so poorly written that the various issues which my car had would be > diluted over a number of categories depending upon how I or others felt > they were best categorized. > > In addition, it never hurts to have additional data points. I was not > trolling this group by asking my question. I genuinely was hoping for > additional anecdotal information in hopes that I might confirm that the > issues I was observing were in fact indicative of a previous generation > of Hondas but that they had been remedied in subsequent ones. Yes one > has to sift through the results but some trends might have emerged which > I could then try to correlate against either the aforementioned media > sources or directly with a service writer friend at a dealership. > > Oh well, happy new year! The auto survey you mention only addresses reliability-- not design issues...so your point is irrelevant. If their automotive engineers agreed with your assessment that there was a design problem, it would have been addressed in the separately published comprehensive test report of that model. Also, don't be a butt head and top post;-) -- We have a spending problem, not a failure to raise taxes problem. --Grover Norquist |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Brief "survey". Has Honda lost its way?
On 12/31/2012 06:31 AM, KWW wrote:
> Fellow newsgroup citizens, we used to be a (nearly) all Honda family - 3 > Hondas and 1 classic VW Beetle (1965). On our earlier Hondas I replaced > timing belts, entire engines, and some other parts myself. Now, however, > the 2 remaining Honda cars I and my in-laws have seem to reflect a > company that has lost its way. Since these are 2002 and 2003 Models > (Civic and Accord, respectively) I wanted to get some feedback as to > whether things have gotten back on track. Here are my observations based > on the 2 Hondas we have: > > 1) there seem to be some design weaknesses which are common across the > platforms. Maybe while trying to be light weight (and less expensive?) > they made things less durable. One example is the steering rack. Both > cars had to have the rack replaced (Accord at 90k miles and Civic and > 134k miles). Both developed oil leaks that took about $600 to track > down/fix - oil pump seals, oil pan seal, and some things on top of the > motor even though when the timing belt was replaced all seals, including > valve cover seal were replace by the dealer. > > 2) The Hondas are even less easy to work on yourself. The oil filter is > very hard to reach. On Civics there is very little room for standard > wrenches if you want to do engine work. I compared that with Hyundai > cars where the Hyundai frames even have indentations which coincide with > where your hand would travel when turning a wrench when replacing a > timing belt, oil filter is down low where it is easy to reach, etc. > > 3) The parts are expensive and the engineering is a bit too complex (so > more things to go wrong). > > From what I have heard from some Toyota owners that brand seems to have > also lost its way and has been cutting corners on part/design quality to > keep costs down. So do you folks think that the current (newer) crop of > Hondas have found their stride and are again great cars or are they not > as great as they used to be in the '80's and '90's? > > Thanks! > > --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: --- yes honda have "lost their way" here in the u.s. but they've got "ex" frod management who have made a series of "bad" decisions, so whether their problems are accident [honda] or design [frod] is open to debate. given that honda's euro models are apparently still excellent, i have to conclude the latter. -- fact check required |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Brief "survey". Has Honda lost its way?
On 12/31/2012 12:47 PM, Elmo P. Shagnasty wrote:
> In >, > > wrote: > >> Fellow newsgroup citizens, we used to be a (nearly) all Honda family - 3 >> Hondas and 1 classic VW Beetle (1965). On our earlier Hondas I replaced >> timing belts, entire engines, and some other parts myself. Now, however, >> the 2 remaining Honda cars I and my in-laws have seem to reflect a >> company that has lost its way. Since these are 2002 and 2003 Models >> (Civic and Accord, respectively) I wanted to get some feedback as to >> whether things have gotten back on track. Here are my observations >> based on the 2 Hondas we have: >> >> 1) there seem to be some design weaknesses which are common across the >> platforms. Maybe while trying to be light weight (and less expensive?) >> they made things less durable. One example is the steering rack. Both >> cars had to have the rack replaced (Accord at 90k miles and Civic and >> 134k miles). Both developed oil leaks that took about $600 to track >> down/fix - oil pump seals, oil pan seal, and some things on top of the >> motor even though when the timing belt was replaced all seals, including >> valve cover seal were replace by the dealer. >> >> 2) The Hondas are even less easy to work on yourself. The oil filter is >> very hard to reach. On Civics there is very little room for standard >> wrenches if you want to do engine work. I compared that with Hyundai >> cars where the Hyundai frames even have indentations which coincide with >> where your hand would travel when turning a wrench when replacing a >> timing belt, oil filter is down low where it is easy to reach, etc. >> >> 3) The parts are expensive and the engineering is a bit too complex (so >> more things to go wrong). >> >> From what I have heard from some Toyota owners that brand seems to have >> also lost its way and has been cutting corners on part/design quality to >> keep costs down. So do you folks think that the current (newer) crop of >> Hondas have found their stride and are again great cars or are they not >> as great as they used to be in the '80's and '90's? >> >> Thanks! > > Nope. > > Not gonna get any better, either. true dat. late 80's/early 90's were their zenith. the cars that were designed then and kept in production continued to be ok - i.e. elements of the accord, the prelude and s2000 are examples. but the stuff that's been designed new since about '95 [with lead time to get into production taking up to about 2000] has been very disappointing. the rot has since then well and truly set in. the civic has been a disgrace since 2001, the rsx in place of the integra, the dropping of the prelude, the neutering of the accord with macpherson strut - anyone may as well just buy a vw and get the same handling but with more guts and the same reliability. and don't get me started on the ridgeline. -- fact check required |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Brief "survey". Has Honda lost its way?
On 01/04/2013 07:36 PM, Elmo P. Shagnasty wrote:
> In >, jim > > wrote: > >> anyone may as well just >> buy a vw and get the same handling but with more guts and the same >> reliability. > > technically you're correct, but what you really mean is "lack of > reliability" indeed. though i have to say, despite my own knowledge on their componentry being inferior to old school honda, the 4-bangers seem to hold up ok. i have friends with 150k on their gti's with no problems other then routine maintenance. or so they say. -- fact check required |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Brief "survey". Has Honda lost its way?
> KWW wrote: > Fellow newsgroup citizens, we used to be a (nearly) all Honda family - 3 > Hondas and 1 classic VW Beetle (1965). On our earlier Hondas I replaced > timing belts, entire engines, and some other parts myself. Now, however, > the 2 remaining Honda cars I and my in-laws have seem to reflect a > company that has lost its way. Since these are 2002 and 2003 Models > (Civic and Accord, respectively) I wanted to get some feedback as to > whether things have gotten back on track. Here are my observations > based on the 2 Hondas we have: > > 1) there seem to be some design weaknesses which are common across the > platforms. Maybe while trying to be light weight (and less expensive?) > they made things less durable. One example is the steering rack. Both > cars had to have the rack replaced (Accord at 90k miles and Civic and > 134k miles). Both developed oil leaks that took about $600 to track > down/fix - oil pump seals, oil pan seal, and some things on top of the > motor even though when the timing belt was replaced all seals, including > valve cover seal were replace by the dealer. > > 2) The Hondas are even less easy to work on yourself. The oil filter is > very hard to reach. On Civics there is very little room for standard > wrenches if you want to do engine work. I compared that with Hyundai > cars where the Hyundai frames even have indentations which coincide with > where your hand would travel when turning a wrench when replacing a > timing belt, oil filter is down low where it is easy to reach, etc. > > 3) The parts are expensive and the engineering is a bit too complex (so > more things to go wrong). > > From what I have heard from some Toyota owners that brand seems to have > also lost its way and has been cutting corners on part/design quality to > keep costs down. So do you folks think that the current (newer) crop of > Hondas have found their stride and are again great cars or are they not > as great as they used to be in the '80's and '90's? > > Thanks! > > --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: --- I own a 1992 Acura Integra, and would never own anything newer than a 1999 Honda or Acura, or any car for that matter! Nuff said. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
"ABC's GMA, Brought to You by Honda, Says Don't Buy Stuff" | Mike | Honda | 5 | April 29th 08 07:02 AM |
Help 96 Honda Civic "Check Engine light" and "ABS light" | [email protected] | Technology | 4 | December 23rd 06 03:12 PM |
survey: Best "rubber" protection/preservative | tsterkel | Technology | 10 | November 4th 06 02:56 AM |
"Panic Alarm" In 2005 Honda Accord LX Going Off By Itrself: Why ? | Robert11 | Technology | 0 | March 20th 06 12:42 AM |