If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
"SVTKate" > wrote in message hlink.net... > > "jim.gm4dhj" > wrote > : Another one with no taste..... :~) > : > LOL > but .... it would seem that the general consensus is... > you be wrong kiddo! hope not..... > > ;¬Þ Kate > > Oh, and.... I personally prefer the SN95 body style. Sleek, sexy... oh > yea. > Noooooooooo!....rear overhang too short........ |
Ads |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
I know I said 2005 and older than '74 were the best looking Mustangs ...but
I have to say the '71/ '73 coupe (back window) and the '67/'68 fastbacks (slope shouldn't have gone all the way to the tail) were not very pleasing....from some angles..... |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
"jim.gm4dhj" > wrote in message
news >I know I said 2005 and older than '74 were the best looking Mustangs ...but >I have to say the '71/ '73 coupe (back window) and the '67/'68 fastbacks >(slope shouldn't have gone all the way to the tail) were not very >pleasing....from some angles..... Settle down, Jim. "No taste" simply means "doesn't agree with me." It's irrelevant what anyone thinks of a car's design, other than those who choose to buy one. The VW Thing was sold to quite a few folks who had no taste. The current Scion box is absolutely horrid, but that's only MY opinion - they seem to sell well enough. Frankly, some of the classic designs that are held up as automotive sculpture do little for me. That's what opinions are for. How boring, if we all thought alike. Come to think of it, if we all thought the same about beauty, there would have been far too much competition over the woman who eventually became my wife... So, you say you have a '66. That style must have pleased your eye. And between '66 and 2005, you haven't met a Mustang you liked... All well and fine. Frankly, I saw the '66 as a huge disappointment, and a styling faux pas that Ford didn't fix until the release of the Fox-body in 1979. The penultimate design styling, the year in which Ford finally got the Mustang perfected, was 1993. So there. dwight |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
"jim.gm4dhj" > wrote i : > : > Oh, and.... I personally prefer the SN95 body style. Sleek, sexy... oh : > yea. : > : Noooooooooo!....rear overhang too short........ : Nun huh! That's the best part! Big front, little rear. : |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
"jim.gm4dhj" > wrote in message news :I know I said 2005 and older than '74 were the best looking Mustangs ...but : I have to say the '71/ '73 coupe (back window) and the '67/'68 fastbacks : (slope shouldn't have gone all the way to the tail) were not very : pleasing....from some angles..... : I think you're just plain TROUBLE :¬D SO, if you had to, which is your favorite? |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
SVT Kate Wrote:
> > Nun huh! > That's the best part! Big front, little rear. just like some women i know... really big front Defiant > : > > |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Hmmmm No taste..... : )
On Sat, 09 Jul 2005 07:02:45 GMT, "jim.gm4dhj" > wrote: >I know I said 2005 and older than '74 were the best looking Mustangs ...but >I have to say the '71/ '73 coupe (back window) and the '67/'68 fastbacks >(slope shouldn't have gone all the way to the tail) were not very >pleasing....from some angles..... > Spike 1965 Ford Mustang fastback 2+2 A Code 289 C4 Trac-Lok Vintage Burgundy w/Black Standard Interior; Vintage 40 16" rims w/BF Goodrich Comp T/A gForce Radial 225/50ZR16 KDWS skins; surround sound audio-video. "When the time comes to lay down my life for my country, I do not cower from this responsibility. I welcome it." -JFK Inaugural Address |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
> SO, if you had to, which is your favorite? > > 64 coupe/conv 65 fastback/conv 67&68 coupe/conv 69 70 sportsroof/conv 71/72/73 sportsroof/conv........can't choose.....all of them...... |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
"jim.gm4dhj" > wrote in message ... : : > SO, if you had to, which is your favorite? : > : > : : 64 coupe/conv 65 fastback/conv 67&68 coupe/conv 69 70 sportsroof/conv : 71/72/73 sportsroof/conv........can't choose.....all of them...... I guess they are all ok, if you are into old iron. I never even noticed a Mustang till the 95. Kate : : |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
I think you would dig my '85 Gt. T-Tops, white, grey interior (red piping),
5 speed, etc. Still in good condition. Stock appearance, but a bunch of suspension upgrades. Fun car! > wrote in message ... > > And thats why your family never left the 'old world' I imagine? taste? > > My personal fav Mustang of 71+ would be a 85 GT with T-Tops, in red, with > grey interior (red piping). There are so few nice four-eye examples around > these days... Sigh... I saw a 85 GT convertible (same color scheme) when I > went for groceries the other nite. Now thats a fairly rare car these days. > It was in real nice shape too. > > > jim.gm4dhj wrote: >> what a waste of 20years...looks just as easy to design a >> >>>good >>>: looking car as a bad one..... >>>: >>> >>>Awwwww c'mon now! >>>The Fox Notch was as sweet a Mustang as you could ever see.. >>> >>>Now, go wash your mouth out. >>> >>>Kate >>>98 Cobra Drop Top. >>>With a funny little Ford face that only a mother could love. >>> >>> >>> >> >> no taste...... :~) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|