If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#141
|
|||
|
|||
Sparky wrote:
> Bill Putney wrote: > >> Sparky wrote: >> >>> Linda wrote: >>> >>> <snip> >>> >>> Please watch your snipping & quoting - I did not post "KNOTHEAD". >>> Actually, I didn't see anything I posted in your quoted text. >>> >>> TIA >> >> Sparkmeister - according to the attributions my browser shows, you >> did post "KNOTHEAD". I had even commented to you that it was a nice >> pun. > > Took a 2nd look & you're right - sorry for the confusion. > > (I had to look back to the dogwood tree reference) |
Ads |
#142
|
|||
|
|||
Sparky wrote:
> Bill Putney wrote: > >> Sparky wrote: >> >>> Linda wrote: >>> >>> <snip> >>> >>> Please watch your snipping & quoting - I did not post "KNOTHEAD". >>> Actually, I didn't see anything I posted in your quoted text. >>> >>> TIA >> >> Sparkmeister - according to the attributions my browser shows, you >> did post "KNOTHEAD". I had even commented to you that it was a nice >> pun. > > Took a 2nd look & you're right - sorry for the confusion. > > (I had to look back to the dogwood tree reference) |
#143
|
|||
|
|||
Big Bill wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 19:51:41 -0500, "Steve Bigelow" > > wrote: > >> >> "Big Bill" > wrote in message >> news >>>> Honestly, I did not realize that there were so many duke fans, and >>>> again as stated, I admitted, i did not find any site to support a >>>> claim that our beloved duke was *OMG* gay..... >>> >>> Are you *really* that naive? Or just that young? >>> Sure, you posted that thinking, "No one here knows who The Duke is, >>> so I can say whatever I want, and no one will even think twice >>> about it." This is Usenet. if you don't understand it, lurk for a >>> while. >>> Primary rule: never post without some idea of how to defend what you >>> say. Especially when you malign an ICON. >> >> Malign? >> How? Is being gay still a big deal in the US? >> > Sorry; insert "intend to". |
#144
|
|||
|
|||
Big Bill wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 19:51:41 -0500, "Steve Bigelow" > > wrote: > >> >> "Big Bill" > wrote in message >> news >>>> Honestly, I did not realize that there were so many duke fans, and >>>> again as stated, I admitted, i did not find any site to support a >>>> claim that our beloved duke was *OMG* gay..... >>> >>> Are you *really* that naive? Or just that young? >>> Sure, you posted that thinking, "No one here knows who The Duke is, >>> so I can say whatever I want, and no one will even think twice >>> about it." This is Usenet. if you don't understand it, lurk for a >>> while. >>> Primary rule: never post without some idea of how to defend what you >>> say. Especially when you malign an ICON. >> >> Malign? >> How? Is being gay still a big deal in the US? >> > Sorry; insert "intend to". |
#145
|
|||
|
|||
linda wrote:
> Big Bill wrote: >> On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 19:50:34 GMT, linda > >> wrote: >> >> >>> Big Bill wrote: >>> >>>> On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 15:43:55 GMT, linda > >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>>> Geoff, i can here you saying this: "if anyone says The Duke >>>>>>> was gay, I'll beat the snot out of you. Same with Errol Flynn. >>>>>>> They were Men's Men, and yer a Commie Pinko if you think >>>>>>> otherwise. " >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> If that's really what you "here", then you have a problem. >>>>>> That's not anywhere near what was written. >>>>>> What was written was a request for some sort of evidence to >>>>>> support your claim. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> and i think i have repeatedly stated, I CANNOT FIND ANY SITE. I >>>>> cannot find any evidence.. hell, how much clearer do i have to be? >>>> >>>> >>>> Then why did you post what you knew would be a post that would >>>> generate requests for some evidence??? >>>> >>> >>> Honestly, I did not realize that there were so many duke fans, and >>> again as stated, I admitted, i did not find any site to support a >>> claim that our beloved duke was *OMG* gay..... >> >> >> Are you *really* that naive? Or just that young? >> Sure, you posted that thinking, "No one here knows who The Duke is, >> so I can say whatever I want, and no one will even think twice about >> it." This is Usenet. if you don't understand it, lurk for a while. >> Primary rule: never post without some idea of how to defend what you >> say. Especially when you malign an ICON. >> > i wish i really were that naive... to be that young again! thank you > for thinking both.... > Actually, I was NOT the original poster that the DUKE was gay. Re-Read > your original posts.... |
#146
|
|||
|
|||
linda wrote:
> Big Bill wrote: >> On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 19:50:34 GMT, linda > >> wrote: >> >> >>> Big Bill wrote: >>> >>>> On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 15:43:55 GMT, linda > >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>>> Geoff, i can here you saying this: "if anyone says The Duke >>>>>>> was gay, I'll beat the snot out of you. Same with Errol Flynn. >>>>>>> They were Men's Men, and yer a Commie Pinko if you think >>>>>>> otherwise. " >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> If that's really what you "here", then you have a problem. >>>>>> That's not anywhere near what was written. >>>>>> What was written was a request for some sort of evidence to >>>>>> support your claim. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> and i think i have repeatedly stated, I CANNOT FIND ANY SITE. I >>>>> cannot find any evidence.. hell, how much clearer do i have to be? >>>> >>>> >>>> Then why did you post what you knew would be a post that would >>>> generate requests for some evidence??? >>>> >>> >>> Honestly, I did not realize that there were so many duke fans, and >>> again as stated, I admitted, i did not find any site to support a >>> claim that our beloved duke was *OMG* gay..... >> >> >> Are you *really* that naive? Or just that young? >> Sure, you posted that thinking, "No one here knows who The Duke is, >> so I can say whatever I want, and no one will even think twice about >> it." This is Usenet. if you don't understand it, lurk for a while. >> Primary rule: never post without some idea of how to defend what you >> say. Especially when you malign an ICON. >> > i wish i really were that naive... to be that young again! thank you > for thinking both.... > Actually, I was NOT the original poster that the DUKE was gay. Re-Read > your original posts.... |
#147
|
|||
|
|||
linda wrote:
> Steve Bigelow wrote: >> "Big Bill" > wrote in message >> news >> >>>> Honestly, I did not realize that there were so many duke fans, and >>>> again as stated, I admitted, i did not find any site to support a >>>> claim that our beloved duke was *OMG* gay..... >>> >>> Are you *really* that naive? Or just that young? >>> Sure, you posted that thinking, "No one here knows who The Duke is, >>> so I can say whatever I want, and no one will even think twice >>> about it." This is Usenet. if you don't understand it, lurk for a >>> while. >>> Primary rule: never post without some idea of how to defend what you >>> say. Especially when you malign an ICON. >> >> >> Malign? >> How? Is being gay still a big deal in the US? >> > also, i would like to interject: is it against the *rules* to be Gay > and an ICON? |
#148
|
|||
|
|||
linda wrote:
> Steve Bigelow wrote: >> "Big Bill" > wrote in message >> news >> >>>> Honestly, I did not realize that there were so many duke fans, and >>>> again as stated, I admitted, i did not find any site to support a >>>> claim that our beloved duke was *OMG* gay..... >>> >>> Are you *really* that naive? Or just that young? >>> Sure, you posted that thinking, "No one here knows who The Duke is, >>> so I can say whatever I want, and no one will even think twice >>> about it." This is Usenet. if you don't understand it, lurk for a >>> while. >>> Primary rule: never post without some idea of how to defend what you >>> say. Especially when you malign an ICON. >> >> >> Malign? >> How? Is being gay still a big deal in the US? >> > also, i would like to interject: is it against the *rules* to be Gay > and an ICON? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Stupid Americans! -- Stupid... Stupid... STUPID!!! _____________---_gadkypy | Michael Barnes | Driving | 4 | January 4th 05 07:47 PM |
Stupid Americans! -- Stupid... Stupid... STUPID!!! ___________ mixqec | Chief_Wiggum | Honda | 16 | November 18th 04 05:18 PM |
Stupid Americans! -- Stupid... Stupid... STUPID!!!___________ mixqec | indago | Honda | 3 | November 8th 04 06:05 PM |
Stupid Americans! -- Stupid... Stupid... STUPID!!! ___________ mixqec | Dr. Rastis Fafoofnik | Honda | 1 | November 7th 04 06:48 PM |