Looks like the "conspiracy theories" really were true after all...

Most people don't know that there were actually 3 buildings which came
crashing down on the day of 9/11.

The third building, WTC 7, can be seen here

http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...32340306101329

There is no mention of this building in 911 Omission Report.

Can fire make a building come crashing down at free fall speed?

If you think it can, patent the idea and make billions in the
demolitions industry!

How do we know WTC 7 was demolished?

If WTC 7 collapsed in 6 seconds, and it takes 6 seconds to free fall
from the roof of WTC 7, then you got it - WTC 7 underwent a free fall.

This means as the each floor was falling straight to the ground it did
so without crashing into anything on the way. ONLY CONTROLLED
DEMOLITION CAN ACCOMPLISH THAT!

PROPOSITION 1:
It took a total of 6 seconds for the roof of WTC 7 to reach the
ground. This proposition is supported by the empirical,

http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...32340306101329
Collapse start time: 17 seconds
Collapse end time: 23 seconds
Total collapse time: 23-17 = 6 seconds

PROPOSITION 2:
A free fall from a height equal to the roof of WTC 7 would take 6
seconds. This proposition derives trivially through (Galilean)
kinematical considerations alone:

Displacement = initial velocity * total time + 1/2 * acceleration *
total time^2

or

s = ut + 1/2at^2
where
s = 174 m (height of building)
u = 0 m/s (building was stationary prior to collapse)
a = 9.8 m/s^2 (since gravitational field strengh averages at
a constant)

Thus,
174 = 0 t + 1/2 9.8 t^2

Solving for t
t = sqrt( 2 * 174 / 9.8)
= 5.9590
~ 6 seconds

In article om>,
says...
> Most people don't know that there were actually 3 buildings which came
> crashing down on the day of 9/11.
>
> The third building, WTC 7, can be seen here
>
> http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...32340306101329
>
> There is no mention of this building in 911 Omission Report.
>
> Can fire make a building come crashing down at free fall speed?
>
> If you think it can, patent the idea and make billions in the
> demolitions industry!
>
> How do we know WTC 7 was demolished?
>
> If WTC 7 collapsed in 6 seconds, and it takes 6 seconds to free fall
> from the roof of WTC 7, then you got it - WTC 7 underwent a free fall.
>
> This means as the each floor was falling straight to the ground it did
> so without crashing into anything on the way. ONLY CONTROLLED
> DEMOLITION CAN ACCOMPLISH THAT!
>
> PROPOSITION 1:
> It took a total of 6 seconds for the roof of WTC 7 to reach the
> ground. This proposition is supported by the empirical,
>
> http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...32340306101329
> Collapse start time: 17 seconds
> Collapse end time: 23 seconds
> Total collapse time: 23-17 = 6 seconds
>
> PROPOSITION 2:
> A free fall from a height equal to the roof of WTC 7 would take 6
> seconds. This proposition derives trivially through (Galilean)
> kinematical considerations alone:
>
> Displacement = initial velocity * total time + 1/2 * acceleration *
> total time^2
>
> or
>
> s = ut + 1/2at^2
> where
> s = 174 m (height of building)
> u = 0 m/s (building was stationary prior to collapse)
> a = 9.8 m/s^2 (since gravitational field strengh averages at
> a constant)
>
> Thus,
> 174 = 0 t + 1/2 9.8 t^2
>
> Solving for t
> t = sqrt( 2 * 174 / 9.8)
> = 5.9590
> ~ 6 seconds
>
>

Since the building actually took over twice that long to collapse, your
"cipherin'" is meaningless, Jethro. In no way did the WTC collapses
resemble a controlled demo.

BDK

On Oct 19, 10:04 pm, BDK > wrote:
> In article om>,
> says...
>

http://www.time.com/time/magazine/ar...531304,00.html


>
"" In almost every clip you'll see little puffs of dust spurting out
from the sides of the towers. There are two competing explanations for
these puffs of dust: 1) the force of the collapsing upper floors
raised the air pressure in the lower ones so dramatically that it
actually blew out the windows.
And 2) the towers did not collapse from the impact of two Boeing 767s
and the ensuing fires. T
hey were destroyed in a planned, controlled demolition. The dust puffs
you see on film are the
detonations of explosives planted there before the attacks.

People who believe the second explanation live in a very different
world from those who believe the first. In world No.
2, al-Qaeda is not responsible for the destruction of the World Trade
Center. The U.S. government is. The Pentagon
was not hit by a commercial jet; it was hit by a cruise missile.
United Flight 93 did not crash after its occupants
rushed the cockpit; it was deliberately taken down by a U.S. Air
Force fighter. The entire catastrophe was
planned and executed by federal officials in order to provide the U.S.
with a pretext for going to war in the
Middle East and, by extension, as a means of consolidating and
extending the power of the Bush Administration.
""

On Oct 29, 9:17 pm, harvey > wrote:
> On Oct 19, 10:04 pm, BDK > wrote:
>
> > In article om>,
> > says...
>
> http://www.time.com/time/magazine/ar...531304,00.html
>
>
>
> "" In almost every clip you'll see little puffs of dust spurting out
> from the sides of the towers. There are two competing explanations for
> these puffs of dust: 1) the force of the collapsing upper floors
> raised the air pressure in the lower ones so dramatically that it
> actually blew out the windows.
> And 2) the towers did not collapse from the impact of two Boeing 767s
> and the ensuing fires. T
> hey were destroyed in a planned, controlled demolition. The dust puffs
> you see on film are the
> detonations of explosives planted there before the attacks.
>
> People who believe the second explanation live in a very different
> world from those who believe the first. In world No.
> 2, al-Qaeda is not responsible for the destruction of the World Trade
> Center. The U.S. government is. The Pentagon
> was not hit by a commercial jet; it was hit by a cruise missile.
> United Flight 93 did not crash after its occupants
> rushed the cockpit; it was deliberately taken down by a U.S. Air
> Force fighter. The entire catastrophe was
> planned and executed by federal officials in order to provide the U.S.
> with a pretext for going to war in the
> Middle East and, by extension, as a means of consolidating and
> extending the power of the Bush Administration.
> ""

This is where the whole Wingnut argument falls apart..

-
In short, they got us. It wasn't a David Copperfield trick. DIck
Cheney wasn't sitting in a toilet stall somewhere, remotley
orchestrating the whole thing..

They Got Us.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kcrF346sS_I

In article om>,
wrote:

> Most people don't know that there were actually 3 buildings which came
> crashing down on the day of 9/11.
>
> The third building, WTC 7, can be seen here
>
> http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...32340306101329
>
> There is no mention of this building in 911 Omission Report.
>
> Can fire make a building come crashing down at free fall speed?

< Snip >

How the hell do think steel is made? The answer is yes.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

wrote:
> Most people don't know that there were actually 3 buildings which came
> crashing down on the day of 9/11.

Most people report they believe in ghosts and UFOs, which when combined
with 9/11 conspiracies make three addle-minded make-believe bits of idiocy.

<snipped nincompoopery>

Truthers are stupid.

Venger

On Oct 20, 1:34 am, Venger > wrote:
> wrote:
> > Most people don't know that there were actually 3 buildings which came
> > crashing down on the day of 9/11.
>
> Most people report they believe in ghosts and UFOs, which when combined
> with 9/11 conspiracies make three addle-minded make-believe bits of idiocy.
>
> <snipped nincompoopery>
>
> Truthers are stupid.
>
> Venger

Mr. Silverstein, the owner of the World Trade Center buildings
admitted to pulling building 7 in a PBS special.
see a clip on google video: http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...32340306101329
According to several websites building 7 collapsed at or around 5:20
pm, just over 6 hours after the first two towers fell. Pretty
impressive demolitions job considering in 6 hours a crew was called up
with materials in hand and rigged that 47 story building to blow.

On Oct 24, 9:30 am, wrote:
> On Oct 20, 1:34 am, Venger > wrote:
>
> > wrote:
> > > Most people don't know that there were actually 3 buildings which came
> > > crashing down on the day of 9/11.
>
> > Most people report they believe in ghosts and UFOs, which when combined
> > with 9/11 conspiracies make three addle-minded make-believe bits of idiocy.
>
> > <snipped nincompoopery>
>
> > Truthers are stupid.
>
> > Venger
>
> Mr. Silverstein, the owner of the World Trade Center buildings
> admitted to pulling building 7 in a PBS special.
> see a clip on google video:http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...32340306101329
> According to several websites building 7 collapsed at or around 5:20
> pm, just over 6 hours after the first two towers fell.

- Pretty impressive demolitions job considering in 6 hours
- a crew was called up with materials in hand and rigged
- that 47 story building to blow.

Yes a Good Example of that All American
"Know How" and Can Do Attitude ! ~ RHF

RHF wrote:

> On Oct 24, 9:30 am, wrote:
>
>>On Oct 20, 1:34 am, Venger > wrote:
>>
>>
wrote:
>>>
>>>>Most people don't know that there were actually 3 buildings which came
>>>>crashing down on the day of 9/11.
>>
>>>Most people report they believe in ghosts and UFOs, which when combined
>>>with 9/11 conspiracies make three addle-minded make-believe bits of idiocy.
>>
>>><snipped nincompoopery>
>>
>>>Truthers are stupid.
>>
>>>Venger
>>
>>Mr. Silverstein, the owner of the World Trade Center buildings
>>admitted to pulling building 7 in a PBS special.
>>see a clip on google video:http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...32340306101329
>>According to several websites building 7 collapsed at or around 5:20
>>pm, just over 6 hours after the first two towers fell.
>
>
> - Pretty impressive demolitions job considering in 6 hours
> - a crew was called up with materials in hand and rigged
> - that 47 story building to blow.
>
> Yes a Good Example of that All American
> "Know How" and Can Do Attitude ! ~ RHF
> .
>
Ass. It was known in the hour that a building -- I dunno from "7" --
was sufficiently damaged by the junk on and against it as to
constitute a hazard to itself and the surround.
It was dropped in on itself so that it wouldn't fall sideways.
IIRC, one smaller service building (mostly automated) was already
crushed.

--
-------(m+
~/)_|
Gresham's Law is not worth a Continental.
http://scrawlmark.org

In article .com>,
says...
> On Oct 20, 1:34 am, Venger > wrote:
> > wrote:
> > > Most people don't know that there were actually 3 buildings which came
> > > crashing down on the day of 9/11.
> >
> > Most people report they believe in ghosts and UFOs, which when combined
> > with 9/11 conspiracies make three addle-minded make-believe bits of idiocy.
> >
> > <snipped nincompoopery>
> >
> > Truthers are stupid.
> >
> > Venger
>
> Mr. Silverstein, the owner of the World Trade Center buildings
> admitted to pulling building 7 in a PBS special.
> see a clip on google video: http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...32340306101329
> According to several websites building 7 collapsed at or around 5:20
> pm, just over 6 hours after the first two towers fell. Pretty
> impressive demolitions job considering in 6 hours a crew was called up
> with materials in hand and rigged that 47 story building to blow.
>
>
>

It's amazing what nonsense the 911 kooks will swallow. It normally takes
months, minimum to set up a building for demolition, but yet the kooks
claim it was done almost instantly.

A kook's mind is a terrible thing to...umm, waste again?

BDK