If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Why no rear lights with DRLs?
Here in Minnesota state law says lights must be on when driving in rain
or impaired visibility. Lots of folks with DRLs ignore this, saying, hey, my DRLs take care of that. But on many (most?) cars with DRLs, the lights are only on in the front. I think rear lights are more needed in these conditions than front ones. Many times in freeway driving I am following someone in an adjacent lane, and through heavy spray I suddenly make out a car in front of me, barely visible, with no lights on. This is especially bad when the car is a medium grey- it blends in well with the asphalt. Why did the manufacturers elect to only light front lights? I think DRLs are a safety hazard, as it causes drivers not to turn on lights they really need, assuming that their DRLs take care of everything. |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Can't speak for all cars, but the three Volvo's I've owned turn rear
lights on along with front ones, either DRL or normal. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Sweden has had DRL since the early 70:s and most manufacturers (all?)
run the tail lights with DRL. Some leave out the instrument lights, possibly as a reminder to the driver to turn the lights on fully at night. Thomas |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
In article <1114091006.18e90d32a8f7726e7d0860cd353154ab@teran ews>,
says... > > >Here in Minnesota state law says lights must be on when driving in rain >or impaired visibility. Lots of folks with DRLs ignore this, saying, >hey, my DRLs take care of that. But on many (most?) cars with DRLs, the >lights are only on in the front. Another reason why DRL's are a stupid idea. ------------ Alex |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
On Thu, 21 Apr 2005, Don Stauffer wrote:
> Here in Minnesota state law says lights must be on when driving in rain > or impaired visibility. Lots of folks with DRLs ignore this, saying, > hey, my DRLs take care of that. But on many (most?) cars with DRLs, the > lights are only on in the front. Yeah, that's one of the many problems with headlamp-based DRLs. They fool drivers into thinking their car has "automatic headlamps", so they drive around at night and in poor weather with only the DRLs, which provide insufficient forward visibility and/or excessive glare, and no presence marking from the sides and rear. > I think rear lights are more needed in these conditions than front ones. Both are needed. So are properly-set-up red rear fogs, but in the words of one of the North American regulators, "The automakers will never let us require those". > Why did the manufacturers elect to only light front lights? I think > DRLs are a safety hazard, as it causes drivers not to turn on lights > they really need, assuming that their DRLs take care of everything. It's an implementation problem, not a conceptual problem. The law says that the parkers, tails and markers CANNOT come on with the DRLs unless: 1) The DRLs are full-intensity low beam headlamps, or 2) The vehicle is equipped with automatic light control that turns on the full-intensity headlamps when ambient light conditions call for it. Manufacturers shy away from (1) because it causes short effective low-beam bulb life, and they're dumb enough in the North American market to include bulbs in new-vehicle warranties (this is also why low-performing "Long Life" bulb variants are used in most North American OE installations) Manufacturers use (2) on some of their higher-end cars, but they shy away from it on mass-market cars 'cause they like to be able to charge extra money for the "feature" of automatic light control. Really, for lots of reasons, headlamp-based DRLs are the wrong way to do it. DS |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Also, taillamps on with DRLs in bright daylight reduces the off/on contrast of brake lights and front turn signals. DS |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
I more or less agree, Daniel.
I dont know if you are speaking to Canadian law, or whether those points apply in the USA as well. DRL's are, IMHO, better than nothing at all, even if the tail lights do not activate, but if would be better if the systems were fully automatic. So many idiots ignore the law here in Texas which says that you should activate your headlights in rain, after legal dark, etc. Many never do it except in darkest night.. There are kits available which reduce the current to the headlights and turn on lights whenever the key is on, BUT I don't think these activate taillights. I was thinking about homebrewing a system, but will continue to just turn on my headlights manually for the time being. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
My latest Volvo has lights that are almost completelt automated. It
has a sensor that decided when DRL should replace the xenon headlights, and it decides separately when the dash lights should go to full bright or allow variable dimming. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
On Thu, 21 Apr 2005, HLS wrote:
> I more or less agree, Daniel. > > I dont know if you are speaking to Canadian law, or whether those points > apply in the USA as well. The US and Canadian DRL standards are almost identical. > DRL's are, IMHO, better than nothing at all, even if the tail lights do > not activate, but if would be better if the systems were fully > automatic. No, it would be better if the systems were designed to optimize the DRL function and encourage proper, rather than improper, driver operation of vehicle lighting systems. DS |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
"Daniel J. Stern" > wrote in message .umich.edu... > > Also, taillamps on with DRLs in bright daylight reduces the off/on > contrast of brake lights and front turn signals. > > DS > Probably why Volvo has separate brake lamps from running lamps. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
flat towing instructions | [email protected] | Jeep | 44 | February 7th 05 06:51 AM |
New *FREE* Corvette Discussion Forum | JLA ENTERPRISES TECHNOLOGIES INTEGRATION | Corvette | 12 | November 30th 04 06:36 PM |
VW Golf 3 rear fog lights | Joseph Meehan | VW water cooled | 6 | October 30th 04 02:14 AM |
E30 Rear lights check relay | jack morantz | BMW | 0 | October 28th 04 11:31 PM |
BMW service lights in the UK | spammy | BMW | 3 | September 18th 04 06:55 PM |