O/T Help Defend A Marine

rw wrote:

> Michael Johnson, PE wrote:
>
>>
>> BTW, don't use the old standby anti-war argument that Saddam had
>> nothing to do with 9/11.
>
>
> Merely because it's true?
>


Hussain supported terrorism with money skimed from the "oil for food"
program. Get your facts straight. The fact that the UN did nothing
about it yet knew (if any of them didn't know, shoot them for
stupidity) proves why the UN should thought of as an enemy.

--
YOU are the real piece of work in this post. I think you are
a couple of drumsticks short of a picnic there bud. - SVTKate

rw wrote:
> Michael Johnson, PE wrote:
>
>>
>> BTW, don't use the old standby anti-war argument that Saddam had
>> nothing to do with 9/11.
>
>
> Merely because it's true?

Prove it is not true. I would rather error on the side of caution and
take out a mass murdering psychopath that threatened us on a daily basis
rather than risk having 100,000's or millions of us dead inside our
borders from terrorists using his WMD's. The potential consequences of
leaving Saddam in power were to severe to ignore. Too many people can't
see danger until the knife is cutting their throat. By then it's too
late to react. I don't include myself in this group.

"Deputy Dog" > wrote in message
news:5tRod.11420$Vy.2660@trndny06...
> He should have beheaded the rat ******* after he shot him.
>

.. . . . . and then **** in his neck!

--
John
ThunderSnake #59
If you Reply, be sure and remove the " (DELETE_THIS) " from the email
address.

On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 08:15:24 GMT, rw >
wrote:

>Michael Johnson, PE wrote:
>> rw wrote:
>>
>>> Michael Johnson, PE wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> BTW, don't use the old standby anti-war argument that Saddam had
>>>> nothing to do with 9/11.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Merely because it's true?
>>
>>
>> Prove it is not true.
>
>Must I also prove that the Tooth Fairy and the Easter Bunny don't exist?

Here are some facts;
Saddam did and had tried to produce nuclear, chemical and bio
weapons, prior to Gulf War 1 and after. He succeeded in producing
chemical weapons and he used them.
Saddam, thanks to a gullible European and Arab community, was
in the process of getting sanctions lifted by the corrupt UN.
This would have given him a big green light to re-start what
he'd done before.
The increase (80% over 2 years) in Asian use of crude oil
has driven up the cost, increasing the coffers of all oil
producing countries, including Irag.
Interecession by Israel in 1983 (bombing the Osirak nuclear reactor)
stopped Saddam from making nukes in the 1980s.
LACK of intercession by the Clinton administration against North
Korea has allowed them to produce nuclear weapons and long range
missles.
IMO, the deposing of Saddam came not a minute too soon.
So stop supporting the ENEMY and start supporting your
country and IT'S best interests. Call it pre-emption if
you believe he had at the time of invasion, no ability to
produce weapons of mass destruction. Remember, Germany
re-armed to massive levels in less than 4 years once Europeans
sanctions were lifted from it, post WW1.

RichA wrote:

> The increase (80% over 2 years) in Asian use of crude oil
> has driven up the cost, increasing the coffers of all oil
> producing countries, including Irag.

Bingo! You hit the nail on the head, there, RichA.

--
Cut "to the chase" for my email address.

Michael Johnson, PE wrote:
>
> We will not physically invade Iran.

I'm sorry to say, for your sake, that the new Secretary of State has
already been chosen, and that the Secretary of Defense is apparently
staying in his post, despite appalling and disgraceful incompetence.

BTW, what does "PE" stand for?

--
Cut "to the chase" for my email address.

The Rebel wrote:

> Did my hitch 25 years ago - I'm 43 - too old. I have an injured back - too
> fragile.
>
> So was Kosovo a just war? If so, why? Because the mass media supported
> Bill Clinton?
>
> It's in America's best interest to kill off the Islamic cockroaches and
> extend democracy to the Middle East. Man, think of all those hot Pursian
> teens wearing tight jeans instead of burkas. Plus, we can sell Mustangs to
> them - they have plenty of oil, so fuel prices won't matter.
>
>

Who knows, if it ever gets really stable in that area, I hear
Yemen and UAE are really nice places :-p


--
YOU are the real piece of work in this post. I think you are
a couple of drumsticks short of a picnic there bud. - SVTKate

rw wrote:

> Michael Johnson, PE wrote:
>
>>
>> We will not physically invade Iran.
>
>
> I'm sorry to say, for your sake, that the new Secretary of State has
> already been chosen, and that the Secretary of Defense is apparently
> staying in his post, despite appalling and disgraceful incompetence.
>
> BTW, what does "PE" stand for?
>

Incompetence??? You're just a blind Bush hater....

--
YOU are the real piece of work in this post. I think you are
a couple of drumsticks short of a picnic there bud. - SVTKate

Joe wrote:

> If you think I'm a pacifist for asking those two questions, then
> you're a complete moron. As for 'military strategy', Bush doesn't
> seem to have a clue what his is.
>
> Joe
> Calypso Green '93 5.0 LX AOD hatch with a few goodies
> Black '03 Dakota 5.9 R/T CC

No, that's not at all what I meant and Bush doesn't need
military strategy, that's what his advisors and military strategists
are for. As usual you misunderstand something and make an ass out of
yourself and exude special hatred toward me in particular. So this
will be the last time you will see me reply to any of your posts for
any reason. And I STILL change my oil ONE time per ****ing year.

--
YOU are the real piece of work in this post. I think you are
a couple of drumsticks short of a picnic there bud. - SVTKate

Michael Johnson, PE wrote:


>>
>> If you think I'm a pacifist for asking those two questions, then
>> you're a complete moron. As for 'military strategy', Bush doesn't
>> seem to have a clue what his is.
>
>
> I'll vouch for you, Joe. I've read enough of your posts over the years
> to know you're no pacifist.

That's not what I meant, but he will never pass up a chance to
yell something vile at me....

--
YOU are the real piece of work in this post. I think you are
a couple of drumsticks short of a picnic there bud. - SVTKate