If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Oxygen sensor question
The check engine light on my 96 Cherokee is on, and the code is calling
out the rear (after converter) oxygen sensor. Auto Zone lists two sensors, both made by Bosch, one "O.E." type for $120 and a universal type for $55. Money IS an object here, is there any huge hassle in using the cheaper universal sensor? Is there any overriding reason that I should spend the extra money for the O.E. sensor? Thanks! Jeff DeWitt |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Oxygen sensor question
Jeffrey DeWitt wrote:
> The check engine light on my 96 Cherokee is on, and the code is > calling out the rear (after converter) oxygen sensor. > > Auto Zone lists two sensors, both made by Bosch, one "O.E." type for > $120 and a universal type for $55. > > Money IS an object here, is there any huge hassle in using the cheaper > universal sensor? Is there any overriding reason that I should spend > the extra money for the O.E. sensor? 1996 XJ? I don't show a rear O2 sensor for that model. and the OEM forward O2 sensor is only $63 from chryslerpartsdirect.com The rear sensor started in 1997 and lists as $76.13 OEM The only real difference in universal vs OEM is having to connectorize it. Sometimes that can be a real pain in the ass. You can just put up with the CE light as all the rear O2 sensor does is check to see if the cat is working properly. Only the forward O2 sensor controls engine mixture. One thing to try first is to get under, disconnect the harness from the sensor then spray the connector with some contact cleaner. Then put it back together. Don't spray the sensor. -- DougW |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Oxygen sensor question
Doug,
Yep, it's a 96 XJ, I know it's got the sensor because I've seen it, and the parts stores do list both sensors. I have to fix it because it won't pass inspection with that light on and a trouble code, otherwise I'd just take the bulb out, that fix worked fine with the up shift light! The sensor has over 300,000 miles on it and has been acting up for about the last 100,000 but cleaning the connector first is a good idea, I'll try that before spending the money on a new one. Thanks! Jeff DeWitt DougW wrote: > Jeffrey DeWitt wrote: > >>The check engine light on my 96 Cherokee is on, and the code is >>calling out the rear (after converter) oxygen sensor. >> >>Auto Zone lists two sensors, both made by Bosch, one "O.E." type for >>$120 and a universal type for $55. >> >>Money IS an object here, is there any huge hassle in using the cheaper >>universal sensor? Is there any overriding reason that I should spend >>the extra money for the O.E. sensor? > > > 1996 XJ? I don't show a rear O2 sensor for that model. > and the OEM forward O2 sensor is only $63 from chryslerpartsdirect.com > The rear sensor started in 1997 and lists as $76.13 OEM > > The only real difference in universal vs OEM is having to connectorize it. > Sometimes that can be a real pain in the ass. > > You can just put up with the CE light as all the rear > O2 sensor does is check to see if the cat is working properly. > Only the forward O2 sensor controls engine mixture. > > One thing to try first is to get under, disconnect the harness > from the sensor then spray the connector with some contact cleaner. > Then put it back together. Don't spray the sensor. > > |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Oxygen sensor question
Do a google for it. I paid about $120 for both OEM types for my old 96. The
front one is worn out at 300k even if there is no cel. You'll get more MPG's. As another posted, try reseating the connectors first. They originally had DENSO brand o2 sensors. They have them he http://replacement.autopartswarehous...Sensor&dp=true JoBo "Jeffrey DeWitt" > wrote in message . .. > The check engine light on my 96 Cherokee is on, and the code is calling > out the rear (after converter) oxygen sensor. > > Auto Zone lists two sensors, both made by Bosch, one "O.E." type for $120 > and a universal type for $55. > > Money IS an object here, is there any huge hassle in using the cheaper > universal sensor? Is there any overriding reason that I should spend the > extra money for the O.E. sensor? > > Thanks! > > Jeff DeWitt |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Oxygen sensor question
the cheaper one will not have the plug on it.. you will have to splice and
connect the wires together. -- "Jeffrey DeWitt" > wrote in message . .. > The check engine light on my 96 Cherokee is on, and the code is calling > out the rear (after converter) oxygen sensor. > > Auto Zone lists two sensors, both made by Bosch, one "O.E." type for $120 > and a universal type for $55. > > Money IS an object here, is there any huge hassle in using the cheaper > universal sensor? Is there any overriding reason that I should spend the > extra money for the O.E. sensor? > > Thanks! > > Jeff DeWitt |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Oxygen sensor question
Hi Jeff,
There are much cheaper original manufacture replacements. But a word of warning if you chose one that must be adapted, do it per instructions as any change in the length of their wires throws something off! like they breath through the wire mech. Examples: http://www.billhughes.com/95YJo2sensor.jpg God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O Jeffrey DeWitt wrote: > > The check engine light on my 96 Cherokee is on, and the code is calling > out the rear (after converter) oxygen sensor. > > Auto Zone lists two sensors, both made by Bosch, one "O.E." type for > $120 and a universal type for $55. > > Money IS an object here, is there any huge hassle in using the cheaper > universal sensor? Is there any overriding reason that I should spend > the extra money for the O.E. sensor? > > Thanks! > > Jeff DeWitt |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Oxygen sensor question
In message <cxrLg.9989$JR5.6771@dukeread11>, "DougW" wrote:
>Jeffrey DeWitt wrote: >> The check engine light on my 96 Cherokee is on, and the code is >> calling out the rear (after converter) oxygen sensor. >> >> Auto Zone lists two sensors, both made by Bosch, one "O.E." type for >> $120 and a universal type for $55. >> >> Money IS an object here, is there any huge hassle in using the cheaper >> universal sensor? Is there any overriding reason that I should spend >> the extra money for the O.E. sensor? > >1996 XJ? I don't show a rear O2 sensor for that model. >and the OEM forward O2 sensor is only $63 from chryslerpartsdirect.com >The rear sensor started in 1997 and lists as $76.13 OEM You need a new book. OBDII and cat monitoring started in '96. > >The only real difference in universal vs OEM is having to connectorize it. >Sometimes that can be a real pain in the ass. I see tons of failed aftermarket Bosch O2 sensors, and the universal ones are the worst. > >You can just put up with the CE light as all the rear >O2 sensor does is check to see if the cat is working properly. >Only the forward O2 sensor controls engine mixture. Not entirely true. > >One thing to try first is to get under, disconnect the harness >from the sensor then spray the connector with some contact cleaner. >Then put it back together. Don't spray the sensor. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Oxygen sensor question
I recommend getting a sensor that is a direct plug-in, NOT a universal one
that has to be spliced. "Jeffrey DeWitt" > wrote in message . .. > The check engine light on my 96 Cherokee is on, and the code is calling > out the rear (after converter) oxygen sensor. > > Auto Zone lists two sensors, both made by Bosch, one "O.E." type for $120 > and a universal type for $55. > > Money IS an object here, is there any huge hassle in using the cheaper > universal sensor? Is there any overriding reason that I should spend the > extra money for the O.E. sensor? > > Thanks! > > Jeff DeWitt |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Oxygen sensor question
REPLY #2
I recently (last week) installed a Bosch O2 Sensor in my Bronco that cost me just over $45. "Jeffrey DeWitt" > wrote in message . .. > The check engine light on my 96 Cherokee is on, and the code is calling > out the rear (after converter) oxygen sensor. > > Auto Zone lists two sensors, both made by Bosch, one "O.E." type for $120 > and a universal type for $55. > > Money IS an object here, is there any huge hassle in using the cheaper > universal sensor? Is there any overriding reason that I should spend the > extra money for the O.E. sensor? > > Thanks! > > Jeff DeWitt |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1992 325i Oxygen sensor fail on scan tool even after replacing and the car runs like crap | [email protected] | BMW | 3 | July 22nd 06 04:59 PM |
3.0 Mitsubishi V-6 1990 Oxygen Sensor Code | [email protected] | Chrysler | 10 | April 24th 06 05:17 PM |
Catalytic converters and oxygen.. | Hugo Schmeisser | Technology | 12 | January 3rd 06 04:46 PM |
2001 VW Passat Oxygen Sensor Check Engine Light | Joseph Meehan | VW water cooled | 23 | February 22nd 05 11:50 PM |
2001 VW Passat Oxygen Sensor Check Engine Light | [email protected] | VW water cooled | 0 | December 14th 04 02:46 AM |