If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
the importance of thermostats
someone i know recently demonstrated that their modern function is
apparently poorly understood. back in the day, a thermostat just sat on the high side of an engine, and opened when the coolant temp convecting around it raised enough. if there was a problem, like the thermostat failing closed, you could take it out and the engine would simply run cold because it was like a faucet that controlled the total coolant flow. and thus easy to understand. but then came emissions regulation, and the need for closer engine temperature management, so "bypass" cooling was introduced by some manufacturers. i.e. there is a separate coolant circuit that flows in parallel to the radiator which allows a much narrower band of engine operating temp, and thus better control of emissions. it works by introducing cooled fluid into what is actually the main circuit, so the pump always has full flow, the engine has no hot spots, and management is close. but, and this is apparently the part that's not so easy to understand, if you run such a motor /without/ its thermostat [which typically has a different configuration also btw*], you completely unbalance the fluid dynamics and you can end up with only bypass flow and consequently have no cooling. this person i know has just blown their third [expensive] race engine not understanding this so i repeat it here for the record. and if this person is reading, and you're still hellbent on running without the thermostat [which doesn't achieve what you want anyway] *block the freakin' "bypass" circuit*!!! * <http://partimages.genpt.com/largeimages/974553.jpg> vs. <http://partimages.genpt.com/largeimages/974529.jpg> -- fact check required |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
the importance of thermostats
jim beam wrote:
> someone i know recently demonstrated that their modern function is > apparently poorly understood. > > back in the day, a thermostat just sat on the high side of an engine, > and opened when the coolant temp convecting around it raised enough. if > there was a problem, like the thermostat failing closed, you could take > it out and the engine would simply run cold because it was like a faucet > that controlled the total coolant flow. and thus easy to understand. > > but then came emissions regulation, and the need for closer engine > temperature management, so "bypass" cooling was introduced by some > manufacturers. i.e. there is a separate coolant circuit that flows in > parallel to the radiator which allows a much narrower band of engine > operating temp, and thus better control of emissions. it works by > introducing cooled fluid into what is actually the main circuit, so the > pump always has full flow, the engine has no hot spots, and management > is close. but, and this is apparently the part that's not so easy to > understand, if you run such a motor /without/ its thermostat [which > typically has a different configuration also btw*], you completely > unbalance the fluid dynamics and you can end up with only bypass flow > and consequently have no cooling. > > this person i know has just blown their third [expensive] race engine > not understanding this so i repeat it here for the record. and if this > person is reading, and you're still hellbent on running without the > thermostat [which doesn't achieve what you want anyway] *block the > freakin' "bypass" circuit*!!! > > > * > <http://partimages.genpt.com/largeimages/974553.jpg> > > vs. > > <http://partimages.genpt.com/largeimages/974529.jpg> Interesting. I had not seen anything like thermo #1 before. Thanks Jim. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
the importance of thermostats
On 9/12/2013 1:20 PM, Paul in Houston TX wrote:
> this person i know has just blown their third [expensive] race engine > not understanding this so i repeat it here for the record. That is not cool. <whap> -- T0m $herm@n |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
the importance of thermostats
Paul in Houston TX > wrote in
: > > Interesting. I had not seen anything like thermo #1 before. > Thanks Jim. Both designs have been in use for decades. "Bypass" cooling has been used since thermostats came into use, and well before emissions controls were ever heard of: it's the only way you can get a thermostat to open before the engine destroys itself. Some systems left the bypass open all the time (#1; early '70s Toyota), counting on the diametric difference between rad hose and bypass hose to bias flow to the rad hose, and some systems used thermostats that blocked the bypass once the thermostat opened (#2; early '70s Mazda), forcing 100% of the flow through the thermostat. Either design will experience overcooling when the thermostat is removed. Concern for emissions -- specifically nitric oxide -- around 1990 resulted in a major change in cooling-system design that had nothing to do with the thermostat itself: The original U-shaped fluid path gave way to the straight-line path that all engines have today. The reason for this change is that the U-shaped path tended to cause the rear cylinder (bottom of the U) to run hotter than the others, making it more difficult to control emissions of nitric oxide; a straight-through path provides more-even temperatures throughout the block. -- Tegger |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
the importance of thermostats
On 09/12/2013 05:47 PM, Tegger wrote:
> Paul in Houston TX > wrote in > : > > >> >> Interesting. I had not seen anything like thermo #1 before. >> Thanks Jim. > > > > Both designs have been in use for decades. true. > > "Bypass" cooling has been used since thermostats came into use, not true. > and well > before emissions controls were ever heard of: nope. see above. > it's the only way you can get > a thermostat to open before the engine destroys itself. absolute nonsense. > > Some systems left the bypass open all the time (#1; early '70s Toyota), > counting on the diametric difference between rad hose and bypass hose to > bias flow to the rad hose, hardly any thermostat is open all the time. and they seldom rely simply on "diametric difference". > and some systems used thermostats that blocked > the bypass once the thermostat opened (#2; early '70s Mazda), forcing 100% > of the flow through the thermostat. i don't know which mazda you have in mind, but ones i've seen, that's not true. the whole point of a "bypass" system is that it is in fact, the primary circuit that flows all the time, and the cooling circuit is secondary - that works only when required. > > Either design will experience overcooling when the thermostat is removed. absolutely not true. the whole point of my post was to illustrate precisely that. > > Concern for emissions -- specifically nitric oxide -- around 1990 started being implemented in the 80's and researched in the 70's. your integra is an example of that. > resulted > in a major change in cooling-system design that had nothing to do with the > thermostat itself: The original U-shaped fluid path gave way to the > straight-line path that all engines have today. The reason for this change > is that the U-shaped path tended to cause the rear cylinder (bottom of the > U) to run hotter than the others, making it more difficult to control > emissions of nitric nitrous. > oxide; a straight-through path provides more-even > temperatures throughout the block. the kind of cooling circuit you describe is antiquated and dates back to "convection only" cooling circuits, even though it continued to be used until about the 70's. and nitrous emissions are the least of your concerns with it. -- fact check required |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
the importance of thermostats
On Thu, 12 Sep 2013 09:41:54 -0700, jim beam > wrote:
>someone i know recently demonstrated that their modern function is >apparently poorly understood. > >back in the day, a thermostat just sat on the high side of an engine, >and opened when the coolant temp convecting around it raised enough. if >there was a problem, like the thermostat failing closed, you could take >it out and the engine would simply run cold because it was like a faucet >that controlled the total coolant flow. and thus easy to understand. > >but then came emissions regulation, and the need for closer engine >temperature management, so "bypass" cooling was introduced by some >manufacturers. i.e. there is a separate coolant circuit that flows in >parallel to the radiator which allows a much narrower band of engine >operating temp, and thus better control of emissions. it works by >introducing cooled fluid into what is actually the main circuit, so the >pump always has full flow, the engine has no hot spots, and management >is close. but, and this is apparently the part that's not so easy to >understand, if you run such a motor /without/ its thermostat [which >typically has a different configuration also btw*], you completely >unbalance the fluid dynamics and you can end up with only bypass flow >and consequently have no cooling. > >this person i know has just blown their third [expensive] race engine >not understanding this so i repeat it here for the record. and if this >person is reading, and you're still hellbent on running without the >thermostat [which doesn't achieve what you want anyway] *block the >freakin' "bypass" circuit*!!! One day when I was working on some related issue, I talked to a GM engineer, and he told that running without a thermostat could indeed overheat the engine, but his explanation was that the coolant would move through the radiator too quickly for it to cool properly. I would think that it's possible. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
the importance of thermostats
On 09/12/2013 07:19 PM, Bill Vanek wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Sep 2013 09:41:54 -0700, jim beam > wrote: > >> someone i know recently demonstrated that their modern function is >> apparently poorly understood. >> >> back in the day, a thermostat just sat on the high side of an engine, >> and opened when the coolant temp convecting around it raised enough. if >> there was a problem, like the thermostat failing closed, you could take >> it out and the engine would simply run cold because it was like a faucet >> that controlled the total coolant flow. and thus easy to understand. >> >> but then came emissions regulation, and the need for closer engine >> temperature management, so "bypass" cooling was introduced by some >> manufacturers. i.e. there is a separate coolant circuit that flows in >> parallel to the radiator which allows a much narrower band of engine >> operating temp, and thus better control of emissions. it works by >> introducing cooled fluid into what is actually the main circuit, so the >> pump always has full flow, the engine has no hot spots, and management >> is close. but, and this is apparently the part that's not so easy to >> understand, if you run such a motor /without/ its thermostat [which >> typically has a different configuration also btw*], you completely >> unbalance the fluid dynamics and you can end up with only bypass flow >> and consequently have no cooling. >> >> this person i know has just blown their third [expensive] race engine >> not understanding this so i repeat it here for the record. and if this >> person is reading, and you're still hellbent on running without the >> thermostat [which doesn't achieve what you want anyway] *block the >> freakin' "bypass" circuit*!!! > > One day when I was working on some related issue, I talked to a GM > engineer, and he told that running without a thermostat could indeed > overheat the engine, but his explanation was that the coolant would > move through the radiator too quickly for it to cool properly. I would > think that it's possible. > so, [logical thinking exercise] if it's running through the radiator too fast to dump heat, how is it running through the engine slow enough to pick up heat in the first place? hint 1: the average radiator has a much greater surface area than the average cylinder core. hint 2: sufficient mass transfer with a small temp delta can out-cool lower mass transfer with a higher temp delta. -- fact check required |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
the importance of thermostats
On Thu, 12 Sep 2013 19:38:54 -0700, jim beam > wrote:
>On 09/12/2013 07:19 PM, Bill Vanek wrote: >> On Thu, 12 Sep 2013 09:41:54 -0700, jim beam > wrote: >> >>> someone i know recently demonstrated that their modern function is >>> apparently poorly understood. >>> >>> back in the day, a thermostat just sat on the high side of an engine, >>> and opened when the coolant temp convecting around it raised enough. if >>> there was a problem, like the thermostat failing closed, you could take >>> it out and the engine would simply run cold because it was like a faucet >>> that controlled the total coolant flow. and thus easy to understand. >>> >>> but then came emissions regulation, and the need for closer engine >>> temperature management, so "bypass" cooling was introduced by some >>> manufacturers. i.e. there is a separate coolant circuit that flows in >>> parallel to the radiator which allows a much narrower band of engine >>> operating temp, and thus better control of emissions. it works by >>> introducing cooled fluid into what is actually the main circuit, so the >>> pump always has full flow, the engine has no hot spots, and management >>> is close. but, and this is apparently the part that's not so easy to >>> understand, if you run such a motor /without/ its thermostat [which >>> typically has a different configuration also btw*], you completely >>> unbalance the fluid dynamics and you can end up with only bypass flow >>> and consequently have no cooling. >>> >>> this person i know has just blown their third [expensive] race engine >>> not understanding this so i repeat it here for the record. and if this >>> person is reading, and you're still hellbent on running without the >>> thermostat [which doesn't achieve what you want anyway] *block the >>> freakin' "bypass" circuit*!!! >> >> One day when I was working on some related issue, I talked to a GM >> engineer, and he told that running without a thermostat could indeed >> overheat the engine, but his explanation was that the coolant would >> move through the radiator too quickly for it to cool properly. I would >> think that it's possible. >> > >so, [logical thinking exercise] if it's running through the radiator too >fast to dump heat, how is it running through the engine slow enough to >pick up heat in the first place? > >hint 1: the average radiator has a much greater surface area than the >average cylinder core. > >hint 2: sufficient mass transfer with a small temp delta can out-cool >lower mass transfer with a higher temp delta. When the ambient is about 115, there's a continuous sun load, and the engine is under load, I can see it. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
the importance of thermostats
On 09/12/2013 08:20 PM, Bill Vanek wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Sep 2013 19:38:54 -0700, jim beam > wrote: > >> On 09/12/2013 07:19 PM, Bill Vanek wrote: >>> On Thu, 12 Sep 2013 09:41:54 -0700, jim beam > wrote: >>> >>>> someone i know recently demonstrated that their modern function is >>>> apparently poorly understood. >>>> >>>> back in the day, a thermostat just sat on the high side of an engine, >>>> and opened when the coolant temp convecting around it raised enough. if >>>> there was a problem, like the thermostat failing closed, you could take >>>> it out and the engine would simply run cold because it was like a faucet >>>> that controlled the total coolant flow. and thus easy to understand. >>>> >>>> but then came emissions regulation, and the need for closer engine >>>> temperature management, so "bypass" cooling was introduced by some >>>> manufacturers. i.e. there is a separate coolant circuit that flows in >>>> parallel to the radiator which allows a much narrower band of engine >>>> operating temp, and thus better control of emissions. it works by >>>> introducing cooled fluid into what is actually the main circuit, so the >>>> pump always has full flow, the engine has no hot spots, and management >>>> is close. but, and this is apparently the part that's not so easy to >>>> understand, if you run such a motor /without/ its thermostat [which >>>> typically has a different configuration also btw*], you completely >>>> unbalance the fluid dynamics and you can end up with only bypass flow >>>> and consequently have no cooling. >>>> >>>> this person i know has just blown their third [expensive] race engine >>>> not understanding this so i repeat it here for the record. and if this >>>> person is reading, and you're still hellbent on running without the >>>> thermostat [which doesn't achieve what you want anyway] *block the >>>> freakin' "bypass" circuit*!!! >>> >>> One day when I was working on some related issue, I talked to a GM >>> engineer, and he told that running without a thermostat could indeed >>> overheat the engine, but his explanation was that the coolant would >>> move through the radiator too quickly for it to cool properly. I would >>> think that it's possible. >>> >> >> so, [logical thinking exercise] if it's running through the radiator too >> fast to dump heat, how is it running through the engine slow enough to >> pick up heat in the first place? >> >> hint 1: the average radiator has a much greater surface area than the >> average cylinder core. >> >> hint 2: sufficient mass transfer with a small temp delta can out-cool >> lower mass transfer with a higher temp delta. > > When the ambient is about 115, there's a continuous sun load, and the > engine is under load, I can see it. you can see reduced delta, but that doesn't change the equation because it would be common to both circumstances. the point is, faster flow doesn't stop the engine cooling, it's misdirection of that flow that causes problems - it's two circuits and no valve directing how much flows in each one. -- fact check required |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
the importance of thermostats
Bill Vanek > wrote in
: > > One day when I was working on some related issue, I talked to a GM > engineer, and he told that running without a thermostat could indeed > overheat the engine, but his explanation was that the coolant would > move through the radiator too quickly for it to cool properly. It's not true. Any reasonably-modern engine will UNDERHEAT without its thermostat. Go ahead, try it yourself. I have. -- Tegger |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
thermostats | Joey Tribiani | VW air cooled | 13 | July 11th 09 06:39 AM |
Richardson in Mexico, stresses Hispanic importance to Obama | [email protected] | Driving | 1 | December 7th 08 05:22 PM |
Of little or no importance... | Paddy's Pig | Auto Photos | 3 | December 15th 07 03:55 PM |
importance of torque signals in steering wheel | [email protected] | Technology | 1 | May 31st 05 04:09 AM |
importance of torque signals in steering wheel | [email protected] | Driving | 0 | May 30th 05 12:50 PM |