If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1161
|
|||
|
|||
GM blasts proposed change in U.S. fuel economy rules
"Fred G. Mackey" wrote: > Eeyore wrote: > > David Hartung wrote: > > > >>Correct me if I am wrong, but until the US entry in to the European war, you > >>were primarily fighting a defensive war. > > > > Up to a point. > > > > Then we went on the offensive in N. Africa. And *won* ! > > But "you" didn't win in Africa until 1943 and of course that was with > assistance from the US. We successfully defeated Rommel's forces unaided. Graham |
Ads |
#1162
|
|||
|
|||
GM blasts proposed change in U.S. fuel economy rules
i am a radical muslim please read my blog, read how islam will win the
clash of civilization. http://www.xanga.com/hfghj23458654fgha |
#1163
|
|||
|
|||
GM blasts proposed change in U.S. fuel economy rules
Eeyore wrote: > "Fred G. Mackey" wrote: > > > Eeyore wrote: > > > David Hartung wrote: > > > > > >>Correct me if I am wrong, but until the US entry in to the European war, you > > >>were primarily fighting a defensive war. > > > > > > Up to a point. > > > > > > Then we went on the offensive in N. Africa. And *won* ! > > > > But "you" didn't win in Africa until 1943 and of course that was with > > assistance from the US. > > We successfully defeated Rommel's forces unaided. LOL. Those tanks you used weren't made in GB. Not all of them, at least. And the aid from U.S. air power was not insignificant. E.P. |
#1164
|
|||
|
|||
GM blasts proposed change in U.S. fuel economy rules
"Matthew T. Russotto" wrote: > Eeyore > wrote: > > > >England - actually Britain and its Empire *resisted* Hitler but Russia delivered > >the knockout blow. > > Wrong, as usual. The war ended after Russian troops captured Berlin. Graham |
#1165
|
|||
|
|||
GM blasts proposed change in U.S. fuel economy rules
Adam Albright wrote: > > On Sun, 07 Jan 2007 19:53:47 GMT, David Hartung > > wrote: > > >Adam Albright wrote: > >> On Sun, 07 Jan 2007 04:52:18 GMT, David Hartung > > >> wrote: > >> > >>> Eeyore wrote: > >>>> Bill Bonde wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> What should the US have done in Kuwait? Do you think it should've > >>>>> decided who would be running Kuwait not based on who ran it before > >>>>> Saddam did his thing? > >>>> Well, the USA decided who should be running Iraq after a fashion ! > >>> I seem to remember open elections in Iraq, or is my memory faulty? > >> > >> Sure... like the "open" elections they had in the old Soviet Union. > > > >Do you have anything other than your opinion to show that the Iraqi elections > >were "fixed"? > > Look at the process of who and how they got on the ballot. Actually > have somebody explain it to you since you're far too dumb yourself to > do either the research or understand what you read. > So Iraqis gave their lives to vote in a fake election? Why aren't they saying that now? -- "The ultimate test is always your own serenity." Robert M Pirsig, "Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance" |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
L98: starts, but won't keep running. | Dave Gee | Corvette | 15 | October 22nd 05 08:43 PM |
Can 02 Mustang show which cylinder misfires on scanner? | John Shepardson | Ford Mustang | 3 | August 29th 05 03:40 AM |
High Gas Prices Fuel an Octane Rebellion | MrPepper11 | Driving | 434 | August 18th 05 12:25 AM |
DaimlerChrysler Commits Over $70 Million to Fuel Cell | Shrike | Dodge | 0 | March 30th 05 09:03 PM |
Change in fuel economy with roof racks on A4 Avant? | Robert | Audi | 7 | August 7th 04 11:52 AM |