If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Raged motorist strikes two cyclists
~
News report from KGW TV (Portland, Oregon) - August 17, 2007 Portland police arrested a driver Friday afternoon after a bizarre chase in which two cyclists were hit by a car in Southeast Portland. It all started around 12:30 PM on 1000 block of Southeast Clinton Street. Police said 46-year-old John Eschweiler was driving along when he reported a cyclist kicked his car. Officers said Eschweiler sped up and hit the cyclist, who rolled onto the hood of the car, smashing the windshield. The car continued on about 75 feet, sideswiping a car and hitting a truck before turning a corner where another cyclist heading towards the car was then hit, investigators said. Police arrested Eschweiler and charged him with two counts of attempted assault. The cyclists, 25-year-old Ben Ramsdell and 41-year-old Timothy Mastne, were taken to OHSU. Their injuries were not life-threatening. Neither cyclist was wearing a helmet. ~ |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Raged motorist strikes two cyclists
Paul Berg wrote:
> ... > The cyclists, 25-year-old Ben Ramsdell and 41-year-old Timothy Mastne, > were taken to OHSU. Their injuries were not life-threatening. > > Neither cyclist was wearing a helmet. Why is h*lm*t non-use always reported, when a foam bicycle hat provides little more than bump and scrape protection? -- Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia BEER IS FOOD -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Raged motorist strikes two cyclists
Tom "Johnny Sunset" Sherman wrote:
> Paul Berg wrote: >> ... >> The cyclists, 25-year-old Ben Ramsdell and 41-year-old Timothy Mastne, >> were taken to OHSU. Their injuries were not life-threatening. >> Neither cyclist was wearing a helmet. > > Why is h*lm*t non-use always reported, when a foam bicycle hat provides > little more than bump and scrape protection? > And, perhaps more to the point, why don't they mention what the injuries were? If the cyclists suffered head injuries, the helmet thingy might be relevant. If they suffered broken limbs and no head injuries, the helmet thingy would be shown to be irrelevant. By not mentioning the type of injuries, they imply that they were head injuries and that helmets might have made a difference. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Raged motorist strikes two cyclists
In article >, fred wrote:
> And, perhaps more to the point, why don't they mention what the injuries > were? If the cyclists suffered head injuries, the helmet thingy might > be relevant. If they suffered broken limbs and no head injuries, the > helmet thingy would be shown to be irrelevant. By not mentioning the > type of injuries, they imply that they were head injuries and that > helmets might have made a difference. I've seen stories like that.... 'the bicycle rider was run over by a truck and his chest was crushed. He was not wearing a helmet' |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Raged motorist strikes two cyclists
On Aug 18, 11:58 am, (Brent P)
wrote: > In article >, fred wrote: > > And, perhaps more to the point, why don't they mention what the injuries > > were? If the cyclists suffered head injuries, the helmet thingy might > > be relevant. If they suffered broken limbs and no head injuries, the > > helmet thingy would be shown to be irrelevant. By not mentioning the > > type of injuries, they imply that they were head injuries and that > > helmets might have made a difference. > > I've seen stories like that.... 'the bicycle rider was run over by a truck > and his chest was crushed. He was not wearing a helmet' Mine was the ATV on the bike path. It rolled into a ditch and the rider drowned. Local CBC station reported no helmet the first report. An hour later they dropped the helmet. I think they figured out that even TRT would likely not claim that a helmet would protect you from drowning. Or realised an ATV is not a bicycle. John Kane, Kingston ON Canada |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Raged motorist strikes two cyclists
"fred" > wrote in message
... > Tom "Johnny Sunset" Sherman wrote: >> Paul Berg wrote: >>> ... >>> The cyclists, 25-year-old Ben Ramsdell and 41-year-old Timothy Mastne, >>> were taken to OHSU. Their injuries were not life-threatening. >>> Neither cyclist was wearing a helmet. >> >> Why is h*lm*t non-use always reported, when a foam bicycle hat provides >> little more than bump and scrape protection? >> > > And, perhaps more to the point, why don't they mention what the injuries > were? If the cyclists suffered head injuries, the helmet thingy might be > relevant. If they suffered broken limbs and no head injuries, the helmet > thingy would be shown to be irrelevant. By not mentioning the type of > injuries, they imply that they were head injuries and that helmets might > have made a difference. And what's up with "attempted" assault? Looks pretty successful from the article. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Raged motorist strikes two cyclists
In article <5sGxi.112683$xk5.38816@edtnps82>,
"Jim Flom" > wrote: > "fred" > wrote in message > ... > > Tom "Johnny Sunset" Sherman wrote: > >> Paul Berg wrote: > >>> ... > >>> The cyclists, 25-year-old Ben Ramsdell and 41-year-old Timothy Mastne, > >>> were taken to OHSU. Their injuries were not life-threatening. > >>> Neither cyclist was wearing a helmet. > >> > >> Why is h*lm*t non-use always reported, when a foam bicycle hat provides > >> little more than bump and scrape protection? > >> > > > > And, perhaps more to the point, why don't they mention what the injuries > > were? If the cyclists suffered head injuries, the helmet thingy might be > > relevant. If they suffered broken limbs and no head injuries, the helmet > > thingy would be shown to be irrelevant. By not mentioning the type of > > injuries, they imply that they were head injuries and that helmets might > > have made a difference. > > And what's up with "attempted" assault? Looks pretty successful from the > article. That they're still alive is perhaps the mitigating factor. -- All opinions are welcome, they give me something to laugh at |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Raged motorist strikes two cyclists
Jim Flom wrote:
:: "fred" > wrote in message :: ... ::: Tom "Johnny Sunset" Sherman wrote: :::: Paul Berg wrote: ::::: ... ::::: The cyclists, 25-year-old Ben Ramsdell and 41-year-old Timothy ::::: Mastne, were taken to OHSU. Their injuries were not ::::: life-threatening. ::::: Neither cyclist was wearing a helmet. :::: :::: Why is h*lm*t non-use always reported, when a foam bicycle hat :::: provides little more than bump and scrape protection? :::: ::: ::: And, perhaps more to the point, why don't they mention what the ::: injuries were? If the cyclists suffered head injuries, the helmet ::: thingy might be relevant. If they suffered broken limbs and no ::: head injuries, the helmet thingy would be shown to be irrelevant. ::: By not mentioning the type of injuries, they imply that they were ::: head injuries and that helmets might have made a difference. :: :: And what's up with "attempted" assault? Looks pretty successful :: from the article. It was attempted murder, not assault. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Raged motorist strikes two cyclists
fred > wrote:
> Tom "Johnny Sunset" Sherman wrote: >> Paul Berg wrote: >>> ... >>> The cyclists, 25-year-old Ben Ramsdell and 41-year-old Timothy >>> Mastne, were taken to OHSU. Their injuries were not >>> life-threatening. Neither cyclist was wearing a helmet. >> >> Why is h*lm*t non-use always reported, when a foam bicycle hat >> provides little more than bump and scrape protection? >> > > And, perhaps more to the point, why don't they mention what the > injuries were? If the cyclists suffered head injuries, the helmet > thingy might be relevant. If they suffered broken limbs and no head > injuries, the helmet thingy would be shown to be irrelevant. By not > mentioning the type of injuries, they imply that they were head > injuries and that helmets might have made a difference. > Nope. They're just letting the public know that they are a couple of morons. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Raged motorist strikes two cyclists
Lobby Dosser wrote:
> fred > wrote: > >> Tom "Johnny Sunset" Sherman wrote: >>> Paul Berg wrote: >>>> ... >>>> The cyclists, 25-year-old Ben Ramsdell and 41-year-old Timothy >>>> Mastne, were taken to OHSU. Their injuries were not >>>> life-threatening. Neither cyclist was wearing a helmet. >>> Why is h*lm*t non-use always reported, when a foam bicycle hat >>> provides little more than bump and scrape protection? >>> >> And, perhaps more to the point, why don't they mention what the >> injuries were? If the cyclists suffered head injuries, the helmet >> thingy might be relevant. If they suffered broken limbs and no head >> injuries, the helmet thingy would be shown to be irrelevant. By not >> mentioning the type of injuries, they imply that they were head >> injuries and that helmets might have made a difference. >> > > Nope. They're just letting the public know that they are a couple of > morons. I see that "Lobby Dosser" has uncritically accepted the bicycle helmet propaganda designed primarily to drive the sales of foam bicycle hats. -- Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
About pedal cyclists. | Eeyore | Driving | 13 | February 8th 07 07:44 AM |
Calif. motorist dies in apparent car chase | 666 | Driving | 18 | June 11th 06 10:04 PM |
Another motorist shot in random shooting | Garth Almgren | Driving | 1 | June 2nd 06 06:29 AM |
Motorist fined $351 for dummy in car-pool lane | Jim Yanik | Driving | 9 | November 8th 05 01:22 AM |