A Cars forum. AutoBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AutoBanter forum » Auto makers » Corvette
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Looks like the "conspiracy theories" really were true after all...



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 20th 07, 02:01 AM posted to alt.autos.corvette,rec.photo.digital,dfw.politics,rec.arts.poems,rec.radio.shortwave
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4
Default Looks like the "conspiracy theories" really were true after all...

Most people don't know that there were actually 3 buildings which came
crashing down on the day of 9/11.

The third building, WTC 7, can be seen here

http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...32340306101329

There is no mention of this building in 911 Omission Report.

Can fire make a building come crashing down at free fall speed?

If you think it can, patent the idea and make billions in the
demolitions industry!

How do we know WTC 7 was demolished?

If WTC 7 collapsed in 6 seconds, and it takes 6 seconds to free fall
from the roof of WTC 7, then you got it - WTC 7 underwent a free fall.

This means as the each floor was falling straight to the ground it did
so without crashing into anything on the way. ONLY CONTROLLED
DEMOLITION CAN ACCOMPLISH THAT!

PROPOSITION 1:
It took a total of 6 seconds for the roof of WTC 7 to reach the
ground. This proposition is supported by the empirical,

http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...32340306101329
Collapse start time: 17 seconds
Collapse end time: 23 seconds
Total collapse time: 23-17 = 6 seconds

PROPOSITION 2:
A free fall from a height equal to the roof of WTC 7 would take 6
seconds. This proposition derives trivially through (Galilean)
kinematical considerations alone:

Displacement = initial velocity * total time + 1/2 * acceleration *
total time^2

or

s = ut + 1/2at^2
where
s = 174 m (height of building)
u = 0 m/s (building was stationary prior to collapse)
a = 9.8 m/s^2 (since gravitational field strengh averages at
a constant)

Thus,
174 = 0 t + 1/2 9.8 t^2

Solving for t
t = sqrt( 2 * 174 / 9.8)
= 5.9590
~ 6 seconds

Ads
  #2  
Old October 20th 07, 03:04 AM posted to alt.autos.corvette,rec.photo.digital,dfw.politics,rec.arts.poems,rec.radio.shortwave
BDK[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 27
Default Looks like the "conspiracy theories" really were true after all...

In article om>,
says...
> Most people don't know that there were actually 3 buildings which came
> crashing down on the day of 9/11.
>
> The third building, WTC 7, can be seen here
>
>
http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...32340306101329
>
> There is no mention of this building in 911 Omission Report.
>
> Can fire make a building come crashing down at free fall speed?
>
> If you think it can, patent the idea and make billions in the
> demolitions industry!
>
> How do we know WTC 7 was demolished?
>
> If WTC 7 collapsed in 6 seconds, and it takes 6 seconds to free fall
> from the roof of WTC 7, then you got it - WTC 7 underwent a free fall.
>
> This means as the each floor was falling straight to the ground it did
> so without crashing into anything on the way. ONLY CONTROLLED
> DEMOLITION CAN ACCOMPLISH THAT!
>
> PROPOSITION 1:
> It took a total of 6 seconds for the roof of WTC 7 to reach the
> ground. This proposition is supported by the empirical,
>
> http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...32340306101329
> Collapse start time: 17 seconds
> Collapse end time: 23 seconds
> Total collapse time: 23-17 = 6 seconds
>
> PROPOSITION 2:
> A free fall from a height equal to the roof of WTC 7 would take 6
> seconds. This proposition derives trivially through (Galilean)
> kinematical considerations alone:
>
> Displacement = initial velocity * total time + 1/2 * acceleration *
> total time^2
>
> or
>
> s = ut + 1/2at^2
> where
> s = 174 m (height of building)
> u = 0 m/s (building was stationary prior to collapse)
> a = 9.8 m/s^2 (since gravitational field strengh averages at
> a constant)
>
> Thus,
> 174 = 0 t + 1/2 9.8 t^2
>
> Solving for t
> t = sqrt( 2 * 174 / 9.8)
> = 5.9590
> ~ 6 seconds
>
>


Since the building actually took over twice that long to collapse, your
"cipherin'" is meaningless, Jethro. In no way did the WTC collapses
resemble a controlled demo.

BDK
  #3  
Old October 20th 07, 05:24 AM posted to alt.autos.corvette,rec.photo.digital,dfw.politics,rec.arts.poems,rec.radio.shortwave
Telamon
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3
Default Looks like the "conspiracy theories" really were true after all...

In article om>,
wrote:

> Most people don't know that there were actually 3 buildings which came
> crashing down on the day of 9/11.
>
> The third building, WTC 7, can be seen here
>
>
http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...32340306101329
>
> There is no mention of this building in 911 Omission Report.
>
> Can fire make a building come crashing down at free fall speed?


< Snip >

How the hell do think steel is made? The answer is yes.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California
  #4  
Old October 20th 07, 06:34 AM posted to alt.autos.corvette,rec.photo.digital,dfw.politics,rec.arts.poems,rec.radio.shortwave
Venger
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 24
Default Looks like the "conspiracy theories" really were true after all...

wrote:
> Most people don't know that there were actually 3 buildings which came
> crashing down on the day of 9/11.


Most people report they believe in ghosts and UFOs, which when combined
with 9/11 conspiracies make three addle-minded make-believe bits of idiocy.

<snipped nincompoopery>

Truthers are stupid.

Venger
  #5  
Old October 20th 07, 12:40 PM posted to alt.autos.corvette,rec.photo.digital,dfw.politics,rec.arts.poems,rec.radio.shortwave
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4
Default Looks like the "conspiracy theories" really were true after all...



http://www.popularmechanics.com/tech...w/1227842.html


http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...0612152114.htm


  #6  
Old October 20th 07, 01:06 PM posted to alt.autos.corvette,rec.photo.digital,dfw.politics,rec.arts.poems,rec.radio.shortwave
Jones
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 6
Default Looks like the "conspiracy theories" really were true after all...

wrote:
>
http://www.popularmechanics.com/tech...w/1227842.html
>
>

Popular Mechanics. Wahahahaha........Ladies Home Journal does a nice report
on what really happened too. Wahahahaha.........



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

  #7  
Old October 20th 07, 02:33 PM posted to alt.autos.corvette,rec.photo.digital,dfw.politics,rec.arts.poems
Bob I
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 316
Default Looks like the "conspiracy theories" really were true after all...

After solving for your lack of brain matter, you're a genuine moron!

wrote:
  #8  
Old October 24th 07, 05:30 PM posted to alt.autos.corvette,rec.photo.digital,dfw.politics,rec.arts.poems,rec.radio.shortwave
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1
Default Looks like the "conspiracy theories" really were true after all...

On Oct 20, 1:34 am, Venger > wrote:
> wrote:
> > Most people don't know that there were actually 3 buildings which came
> > crashing down on the day of 9/11.

>
> Most people report they believe in ghosts and UFOs, which when combined
> with 9/11 conspiracies make three addle-minded make-believe bits of idiocy.
>
> <snipped nincompoopery>
>
> Truthers are stupid.
>
> Venger


Mr. Silverstein, the owner of the World Trade Center buildings
admitted to pulling building 7 in a PBS special.
see a clip on google video: http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...32340306101329
According to several websites building 7 collapsed at or around 5:20
pm, just over 6 hours after the first two towers fell. Pretty
impressive demolitions job considering in 6 hours a crew was called up
with materials in hand and rigged that 47 story building to blow.


  #9  
Old October 24th 07, 06:11 PM posted to alt.autos.corvette,rec.photo.digital,dfw.politics,rec.arts.poems,rec.radio.shortwave
RHF
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 11
Default Looks like the "conspiracy theories" really were true after all...

On Oct 24, 9:30 am, wrote:
> On Oct 20, 1:34 am, Venger > wrote:
>
> > wrote:
> > > Most people don't know that there were actually 3 buildings which came
> > > crashing down on the day of 9/11.

>
> > Most people report they believe in ghosts and UFOs, which when combined
> > with 9/11 conspiracies make three addle-minded make-believe bits of idiocy.

>
> > <snipped nincompoopery>

>
> > Truthers are stupid.

>
> > Venger

>
> Mr. Silverstein, the owner of the World Trade Center buildings
> admitted to pulling building 7 in a PBS special.
> see a clip on google video:http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...32340306101329
> According to several websites building 7 collapsed at or around 5:20
> pm, just over 6 hours after the first two towers fell.


- Pretty impressive demolitions job considering in 6 hours
- a crew was called up with materials in hand and rigged
- that 47 story building to blow.

Yes a Good Example of that All American
"Know How" and Can Do Attitude ! ~ RHF
  #10  
Old October 24th 07, 07:41 PM posted to alt.autos.corvette,rec.photo.digital,dfw.politics,rec.arts.poems,rec.radio.shortwave
BDK[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 27
Default Looks like the "conspiracy theories" really were true after all...

In article .com>,
says...
> On Oct 20, 1:34 am, Venger > wrote:
> > wrote:
> > > Most people don't know that there were actually 3 buildings which came
> > > crashing down on the day of 9/11.

> >
> > Most people report they believe in ghosts and UFOs, which when combined
> > with 9/11 conspiracies make three addle-minded make-believe bits of idiocy.
> >
> > <snipped nincompoopery>
> >
> > Truthers are stupid.
> >
> > Venger

>
> Mr. Silverstein, the owner of the World Trade Center buildings
> admitted to pulling building 7 in a PBS special.
> see a clip on google video:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...32340306101329
> According to several websites building 7 collapsed at or around 5:20
> pm, just over 6 hours after the first two towers fell. Pretty
> impressive demolitions job considering in 6 hours a crew was called up
> with materials in hand and rigged that 47 story building to blow.
>
>
>


It's amazing what nonsense the 911 kooks will swallow. It normally takes
months, minimum to set up a building for demolition, but yet the kooks
claim it was done almost instantly.

A kook's mind is a terrible thing to...umm, waste again?

BDK
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
1932 Ford "Deuce" and Flathead V8 75th Anniversary - "BlownHemi32.jpg" 513.4 KBytes yEnc "BlownFlathead.jpg" yEnc 513437 Bytes mike[_20_] Auto Photos 0 August 12th 07 04:35 PM
1932 Ford "Deuce" and Flathead V8 75th Anniversary - "BlownHemi32.jpg" 513.4 KBytes yEnc "BlownFlathead.jpg" (2/2) yEnc 513437 Bytes mike[_20_] Auto Photos 0 August 12th 07 04:20 PM
1932 Ford "Deuce" and Flathead V8 75th Anniversary - "BlownHemi32.jpg" 513.4 KBytes yEnc "BlownFlathead.jpg" (1/2) yEnc 513437 Bytes mike[_20_] Auto Photos 0 August 12th 07 04:20 PM
Volkswagen exposes the swastika as "S" for "socialism" - known as the "swastika hubcap" car, the VW hubcaps (when spinning at certain speeds) remind some people of the symbol of the National Socialist German Workers' Par rexcurrydotnet Driving 0 February 23rd 06 07:23 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AutoBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.