If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
1959 Bel Air versus 2009 Malibu - NMC but at least car-related
"Christopher Muto" > wrote:
> phony or not, wouldn't you rather die behind the wheel of a '59 > bel air then be seen alive driving a 2009 malibu? Neither. Notice they didn't mention that both cars were junk BEFORE the crash, the only difference was they were mangled junk after! <GD&R> -- XS11E, Killing all posts from Google Groups The Usenet Improvement Project: http://twovoyagers.com/improve-usenet.org/ |
Ads |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
1959 Bel Air versus 2009 Malibu - NMC but at least car-related
Christopher Muto wrote:
> phony or not, wouldn't you rather die behind the wheel of a '59 bel air then > be seen alive driving a 2009 malibu? You do bring up a good point, and I am not even a big classic car fan. ;-) I'll definitely take death in my Miata over a life of driving almost any American-made car, especially American cars manufactured from about 1970 to the present, with the possible exception of the Corvette. Pat |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
1959 Bel Air versus 2009 Malibu - NMC but at least car-related
XS11E wrote:
> It's phony, it was very carefully staged to prove the point they > intended to prove. Very much like a certain "News" network blowing up > trucks. Whoosh! That one flew right over me. :-) I am guessing that the news network being referred to is Fox, but what is this about the staged blowing up of trucks? Pat |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
1959 Bel Air versus 2009 Malibu - NMC but at least car-related
XS11E wrote:
> Neither. Notice they didn't mention that both cars were junk BEFORE > the crash, the only difference was they were mangled junk after! <GD&R> I would be interested to see how a 2009 Miata holds up against a 1959 model lead sled. I would like to see that in a controlled crash video that is, not with me driving either car. 40 mph each, that adds up to a nice little impact. "It'll buff right out" - lol Patrick |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
1959 Bel Air versus 2009 Malibu - NMC but at least car-related
pws > wrote:
> XS11E wrote: > >> It's phony, it was very carefully staged to prove the point they >> intended to prove. Very much like a certain "News" network >> blowing up trucks. > > > Whoosh! That one flew right over me. :-) > > I am guessing that the news network being referred to is Fox, but > what is this about the staged blowing up of trucks? Fox has never been that dishonest, NBC has. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dateline_NBC General Motors Dateline NBC aired an investigative report about General Motors pickup trucks allegedly exploding upon impact during accidents due to poor design of fuel tanks. Dateline's film showed a sample of a low speed accident with the fuel tank exploding. In reality, Dateline NBC producers had rigged the truck with remotely detonated explosives. The program did not disclose the fact that the accident was staged. GM investigators studied the film, and discovered that smoke actually came out of the fuel tank a split-second before impact. GM subsequently filed an anti-defamation lawsuit against NBC after conducting an extensive investigation. On February 18, 1993 GM conducted a highly publicized point-by-point rebuttal that lasted nearly two hours after announcing the lawsuit. The lawsuit was quickly settled by NBC, and Jane Pauley read an apology on the program. The following Dateline NBC producers were dismissed: Jeff Diamond, executive producer; David Rummel, senior producer; and Robert Read, producer of the report on the pickups. Michele Gillen, the reporter involved in the segment, was transferred to Miami station WTVJ. Michael G. Gartner, president of the news division, resigned under pressure. Keep reading past this to more of NBC's questionable tactics. -- XS11E, Killing all posts from Google Groups The Usenet Improvement Project: http://twovoyagers.com/improve-usenet.org/ |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
1959 Bel Air versus 2009 Malibu - NMC but at least car-related
pws > wrote:
> I would be interested to see how a 2009 Miata holds up against a > 1959 model lead sled. > > I would like to see that in a controlled crash video that is, not > with me driving either car. I'll set it up but you have to drive the Miata, we'll get someone to drive a 1959 model. Since you didn't specify the make, chose between Greyhound, Mack or Peterbuilt. ;-) -- XS11E, Killing all posts from Google Groups The Usenet Improvement Project: http://twovoyagers.com/improve-usenet.org/ |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
1959 Bel Air versus 2009 Malibu - NMC but at least car-related
This might be the most reasonable point yet ;-)
Chris 99BBB "XS11E" > wrote in message ... > "Christopher Muto" > wrote: > >> phony or not, wouldn't you rather die behind the wheel of a '59 >> bel air then be seen alive driving a 2009 malibu? > > Neither. Notice they didn't mention that both cars were junk BEFORE > the crash, the only difference was they were mangled junk after! <GD&R> > > > > > -- > XS11E, Killing all posts from Google Groups > The Usenet Improvement Project: > http://twovoyagers.com/improve-usenet.org/ |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
1959 Bel Air versus 2009 Malibu - NMC but at least car-related
On Oct 13, 12:20*am, "Chris D'Agnolo" > wrote:
> This might be the most reasonable point yet ;-) I want a 1959 Chevy El Camino (based on the Bel Air chassis) but modified like this: http://www.truckinweb.com/features/0.../photo_05.html The 2009/2010 Chevy Malibu is a world class family car that beat the Honda Accord and the Toyota Camry heads-up in most comparison tests; the first domestic car to do so since the original Taurus in 1986. Maybe a boring car from an enthusiast's standpoint, but certainly not junk! |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
1959 Bel Air versus 2009 Malibu - NMC but at least car-related
"Tim M." > wrote:
> The 2009/2010 Chevy Malibu is a world class family car that beat > the Honda Accord and the Toyota Camry heads-up in most comparison > tests; the first domestic car to do so since the original Taurus > in 1986. Maybe a boring car from an enthusiast's standpoint, but > certainly not junk! It's junk as are all Chevrolets. CR once rated all Chevy models from 1957 to current as unaceptable due to frequency of repair. That was some years back but things haven't changed. "The 2010 Chevrolet Malibu reliability score of 5.0 out of 10 is the Predicted Reliability rating provided by J.D. Power and Associates." Pathetic. http://usnews.rankingsandreviews.com...-Midsize-Cars/ Notice, as expected, the Chevy shows the LOWEST reliability score of all cars listed? -- XS11E, Killing all posts from Google Groups The Usenet Improvement Project: http://twovoyagers.com/improve-usenet.org/ |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
1959 Bel Air versus 2009 Malibu - NMC but at least car-related
In article
>, "Tim M." > wrote: > They found what they wanted in Indiana. "The frame was sound and all > the body panels were sound," he said. It had a 3.9-liter 6-cylinder > engine and was in driving condition. > Hmmmmm, that's a fairly slender inline six, which as I recall left lots of open space on either side of the engine compartment. I wonder how the '59 would have fared had it been equipped with the wider 283 V8, or even better, the much wider big block 348. I'm thinking it would've fared better. --Geary |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
J vin versus 1 vin? | alfred[_3_] | Honda | 2 | November 22nd 07 05:56 PM |
525 versus 530 | bmoag | BMW | 6 | February 28th 06 01:41 AM |
CR-V -versus- Rav 4 | fish | Honda | 21 | December 19th 05 06:53 AM |