"Al Qaeda" does not exist

I have had more than enough of this big lie. I suppose
the **** hit the fan with the announced publishing of the
reputed thoughts of "Al Qaeda", a fictionalized organization
created by the CIA through their control of Western media.

When the neo-CONS invaded Iraq they needed to show
results and that meant capturing the Iraqi leadership, and
that is what they did with the killing of Saddam Hussein's
sons and the capture of the man himself, pulling him from
a small hole in the ground.

Yet here we are three and one half years after 9-11 and not
a sign of Osama Bin Laden or his right hand man Ayman
al-Zawahri. Naturally I mean there is not a sign of either of
them being captured; the two of them are a constant presence
in the "news".

Not only are these two more elusive than Aladdin's lamp, but
their reputed "Al Qaeda" associate in Iraq -Abu Musab
al-Zarqawi- continues to issue edicts and threats (or so the
CIA claims through the Western media) with the same $25mil
bounty on his head as the Hussein's had to contend with in
what proved a losing battle.

How is it that these three "Al Qaeda" leaders succeed where
the Hussein's so easily -and quickly- succumbed? Who else
on this planet defies the all mighty Pentagon/CIA monster led
by the Israelis and continues to breathe air among the living
and roam free?

Really now, let us genuflect upon the differences. The Hussein's
literally tried to hide the very fact that they were alive. For a long
time we were treated to rumors that Saddam might have been
blown up right in the beginning, yet his sons were killed and
Saddam was extracted from a hole in the ground in the middle of
nowhere in less than one third the time in which the Al Qaeda
brothers have been staring on international television.

"Carlos the Jackal" was for decades the most famous and wanted
terrorist in the world. For decades we not only did not know what
he looked like but we did not know his real name. Even today after
Ilich Ramirez Sanchez has been tried in France and sentenced to
life, and had appeals heard in public most people in the FBI and
CIA could not pick him out of a lineup without preparation.

On the other hand, the three amigos of "Al Qaeda" command a
larger platform than Al Jazeera, but remain eternally elusive while
this extraordinary state of being goes largely uncommented upon
by any major figures in the Western "press". You would think that
by now the heads of literally dozens of agencies in branches of the
military and Intelligence would have come off for their failure to find
these "elusive" creatures who seem to hold court at will for an
international audience every week, yet I cannot think of one dismissal
for that reason nor cite one major newspaper or TV network calling
for such action.

The whole thing bears an eerie likeness to George Orwell's "1984"
where the population is daily bombarded with supposed edicts and
threats from the fictionalized Emmanuel Goldstein.

In "1984" the population is all consumed by the unspoken "doublethink"
message that Emmanuel Goldstein was an unconquerable enemy who
the empire nonetheless was daily scoring wins against, not unlike the
seemingly unstoppable "Al Qaeda" who -nonetheless we are told- are
losing their battle against us.

And has any of us ever heard from one of these "senior leaders" in
"Al Qaeda"?

No.

No one ever goes on trial, and indeed we are told that none of them
will ever be put on trial. Secret military tribunals yes, public trials no.

So what and who do we have for confirmation that "Al Qaeda"
actually exists?

Why "CIA confirmations" through the Western media of course! CIA
confirmations which are then unthinkingly circulated through the non-
Western media which causes these poor, desperate Arab and Muslim
groups to believe that such an entity as "Al Qaeda" really exists, and
so they pledge their group (or cell) allegiance to a supposed "underground"
terrorist group and leadership which has an international platform from
which to speak at will, and the Western media always "forget" to mention
the name of the local group and simply tell us they are "members of Al Qaeda".

Amazing.

How much longer until Osama Bin Laden appears on a box of Wheaties?

If Johnny Carson were still with us and hosting the Tonight Show I wouldn't
be surprised to see Osama Bin Laden turn up as a guest host.

"Live from somewhere else on planet Earth, heerrrrrre's Osama!"

If Hollywood concocted such a movie it would be laughed at ("Robocop"
was funny at one time), yet this big lie continues to circulate unquestioned
week after week for at least three and one half years now, during which
time the three amigos of "Al Qaeda" have made more appearances on my
TV than have Jim Carrey, Robin Williams and Adam Sandler.


How much more of this insanity, how many more dead bodies in Iraq,
before we all summon the courage to say loudly and forcefully that the
emperor has no clothes?

How much longer before that treasonous piece of garbage James Kallstrom
is hauled before the TV cameras and an explanation for Building 7 is
demanded of him? When does his trial for treason begin? There
was more than enough evidence to try Kallstrom before 9-11.

Then there is the massive problem of "Homeland Security". This is not to
"protect the American people", it is to protect the rich and treasonous
_from_ the righteous rage of the American people whose jobs and futures
have been exported to the third world.

These are the same people who have propped up a criminal regime in
Columbia for four decades and are actively trying to overthrow Hugo Chavez
in Venezuela, even though President Chavez has been honestly elected to
the Presidency of Venezuela more times -just in the last few years!- than the
entire Bush family over the last sixty years.

These are the people who imported 50 million people into America who we
do not need here. These are the people who deindustrialized our nation.
These are the people who bombed us on 9-11. These are the people who
created the fictional "Al Qaeda". These are the people who created
"Homeland Security" to go to war with us because the scum fully understand
what they have done and realize their "panic rooms" will not save them.
These are the people who read the Bill of Rights and Declaration of Independence
as subversive documents.

You think everything is OK and the media are not "on the team"?

Then where is Jose Padilla?

They told you that the Supreme Court said his detention was illegal and thus
our freedom preserved, but Jose Padilla is still locked up without charges,
just as he was before they told us this big lie. The Fourth, Fifth and Sixth
Amendments to the Constitution are no longer in effect, not as long as
Jose Padilla remains caged.

And caged is the best that you can hope for in the future unless this thing
is stopped now. They are locking down the nation within even as the
Mexican border remains wide open, so easily penetrable that a huge
dirty bomb could be trucked across that border and delivered to any
American city.

And they claim they are trying to protect us.


- - - - -
"What opinions the masses hold, or do not hold, is looked on as a matter of
indifference. They can be granted intellectual liberty because they have no
intellect. In a Party member, on the other hand, not even the smallest deviation
of opinion on the most unimportant subject can be tolerated." - George Orwell, "1984"

In article >,
Awake > wrote:

> I have had more than enough of this big lie. I suppose
> the **** hit the fan with the announced publishing of the
> reputed thoughts of "Al Qaeda", a fictionalized organization
> created by the CIA through their control of Western media.
>

<snipped bullcrap>

Troll.
Moron.
Clueless idiot.

<plonk!!!>

Om -> Not a republican...
--
Om.

"My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-bitch." -Jack Nicholson

Not exactly. The theory is that Al Qaeda does exist, but it is made up of
all those Holocaust "victims" that never really died. And soon it will also
come out that the 911 mastermind was not the work of Al Qaeda terrorists but
Michael Moore to provide the basis for his Fahrenheit 911 mockumentory.

A good topic for discussion at your next Flat Earth Society meeting.




"OmManiPadmeOmelet" > wrote in message
...
> In article >,
> Awake > wrote:
>
>> I have had more than enough of this big lie. I suppose
>> the **** hit the fan with the announced publishing of the
>> reputed thoughts of "Al Qaeda", a fictionalized organization
>> created by the CIA through their control of Western media.
>>
>
> <snipped bullcrap>
>
> Troll.
> Moron.
> Clueless idiot.
>
> <plonk!!!>
>
> Om -> Not a republican...
> --
> Om.
>
> "My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-bitch." -Jack
> Nicholson

"tech27" > wrote in message
o.verio.net...
> Not exactly. The theory is that Al Qaeda does exist, but it is made up of
> all those Holocaust "victims" that never really died.


Wouldn't the youngest holocaust victims that never really died be
approaching 70 years of age by now?

Maybe it's just me, but I am not sure how much damage a person can do that
can barely get out of bed in the morning.

The OP might be a troll but it is an interesting topic nevertheless.

Actually there were a couple of programmes on UK TV the other week that put
forward this contention that 'Al Quaeda' is not all-encompassing
organisation and that the way it has been built up and used by governments
to pass laws limiting civil liberties is quite Orwellian.

There are groups of terrorists (obviously) but they act independently or, at
least, autonomously. The US and other governments handed certain terrorist
leaders a golden opportunity and now quite a few people claim to act on
behalf of this ubiquitous Al Quaeda.

Frankly, however much I am acutely aware of terrorism and its dangers I have
always had my doubts about this 'organisation'. The US and then the British
forces found absolutely nothing in Tora Bora (or wherever it was they were
looking in Afghanistan) and there was no evidence of some network of caves
in the Afghan hills.

In my opinion it would, in any case, have taken years of construction to
build such a thing, with great effort, since it was in the middle of
nowhere. Use of explosives would probably have been detected. Otherwise,
digging by hand would have taken even longer and perhaps large groups of
people and that would have been detected also.

Etc etc.

DAS

For direct contact replace nospam with schmetterling
---

"Jeff Strickland" > wrote in message
...
>
> "tech27" > wrote in message
> o.verio.net...
>> Not exactly. The theory is that Al Qaeda does exist, but it is made up of
>> all those Holocaust "victims" that never really died.
>
>
> Wouldn't the youngest holocaust victims that never really died be
> approaching 70 years of age by now?
>
> Maybe it's just me, but I am not sure how much damage a person can do that
> can barely get out of bed in the morning.
>
>
>
>
>
>

"Dori A Schmetterling" > wrote in message
...
> The OP might be a troll but it is an interesting topic nevertheless.
>
> Actually there were a couple of programmes on UK TV the other week that
> put forward this contention that 'Al Quaeda' is not all-encompassing
> organisation and that the way it has been built up and used by governments
> to pass laws limiting civil liberties is quite Orwellian.

It's not built up that way in the US. Most people here understand quite well
that it is at most a loose conglomeration of independent groups working,
sometimes, to the same end. Some of these people draw nothing more from Al
Qaeda than enthusiam. I don't think many people in the US see Al Qaeda (The
Base), as a base of operations, but moreso a base for a running manifesto of
sorts. To me it isn't unlike the terror of the 70's and 80's in which cells
did not know about each other, though were obstensively working for the same
group and same end. Except that in this case one of Bin Laden's decree has
been that fighting for the same end doesn't translate into fighting
together.

It is a lot easier for our government and others to say "Al Qaeda" than it
is to explain the nuances of the organization each and every time they speak
to actions taken by groups related to Bin Ladens aims. One should not read
too much into this abbreviated reference to terror.

> There are groups of terrorists (obviously) but they act independently or,
> at least, autonomously. The US and other governments handed certain
> terrorist leaders a golden opportunity

I don't believe that for a second. The only opportunity we handed them is
the freedom with which people move enter and move about our country. It's
easy to bomb something here and it makes a big splash on the streets are
Arabia, people who for the most part have little idea just how easy it is to
operate in the US.

> and now quite a few people claim to act on behalf of this ubiquitous Al
> Quaeda.

I find it of little importance what they call themselves or who they
blame their actions on. One has to remember that these people don't want to
get caught and deception would seem to assist them in that aim.

> Frankly, however much I am acutely aware of terrorism and its dangers I
> have always had my doubts about this 'organisation'. The US and then the
> British forces found absolutely nothing in Tora Bora (or wherever it was
> they were looking in Afghanistan) and there was no evidence of some
> network of caves in the Afghan hills.

I have seen complete videos of networks of caves as well as munitions
stashes and living accoutrments left in them. I don't know what you are
talking about, but these caves are part of a long history of war in
Afghanistan. Read Soviet General Pushtan's book on that war to find out the
reality of these caves and how they were networked.

> In my opinion it would, in any case, have taken years of construction to
> build such a thing, with great effort, since it was in the middle of
> nowhere. Use of explosives would probably have been detected. Otherwise,
> digging by hand would have taken even longer and perhaps large groups of
> people and that would have been detected also.

Many of the caves are natural. Not unlike lava tubes found in Hawaii and
Galapagos.

I think it is all basically irrelevant though. The aim of these people is a
new world caliphate. How do you achieve that, well, you do it by beating the
biggest dog on the block first...bringing more and more fanatics to fold.
You don't activate the crazies by attacking France, you do it by attacking
the states. We are, after all, the devil incarnate.

What astounds me about most of this is that it appears some countries in
Europe don't understand that they are next on the list. This isn't about the
US in particular, but rather about the US because it is strategically,
though maybe not tactically, the best initial contact by which to energize
those who believe the world should live beneath Muslim law (though I always
find it funny that Muslim extremists think we are godless and Europeans, at
least some, think we lean to heavily on Christian belief).

I have never agreed with Bush's actions, but I have always marveled at how
far ahead his vision of the importance of the last 4 years and their bearing
on the future of the world is, than people like Chirac and Schroeder.

Remember, it was Europe, in the last 90 years, that was the genesis of two
horrific wars. And for the most part it was this same policy of
non-provocation that gave room for these wars to develop.

> In my opinion it would, in any case, have taken years of construction to
> build such a thing, with great effort, since it was in the middle of
> nowhere. Use of explosives would probably have been detected. Otherwise,
> digging by hand would have taken even longer and perhaps large groups of
> people and that would have been detected also.

Have you seen that hilarious clip of Rumsfeld on "Meet The Press" where he,
with the help of illustrations that seemed to be the blueprints for
something out of a Bond movie, described these underground caves, fortresses
even, with offices, bedrooms, hydro-electro power, air ventilation systems,
entrances large enough to drive in trucks and tanks, etc, etc. It was just
nuts.

Quoth "Dori A Schmetterling" > in news:4218c635$0
:

> Actually there were a couple of programmes on UK TV the other
> week that put forward this contention that 'Al Quaeda' is not
> all-encompassing organisation and that the way it has been built
> up and used by governments to pass laws limiting civil liberties
> is quite Orwellian.

"The Power of Nightmares" -- a BBC2 three-parter documenting the
parallel rise of two similarly-driven terrorist movements: the
Straussian NeoCons and the Wahabi Jihadists.

Part 1 "Baby, It's Cold Outside"
<http://indypeer.org/show_file_page.php?file_id=363>
Part 2 "The Phantom Victory"
<http://indypeer.org/show_file_page.php?file_id=362>
Part 3 "The Shadows in the Cave"
<http://indypeer.org/show_file_page.php?file_id=361>

It's a very insightful series, and the thesis as presented does
explain a lot about how these two terrorist movements have been
packaged for US and UK consumption.

--
George Bush's War of Choice on Iraq is a totally unnecessary war.
Every life lost, every limb lost, every disfigurement, every
disability caused there is more blood on George W. Bush's hands,
and on the hands of everyone who voted for George W. Bush.
The more you know, the less likely you were to vote for Bush.
<http://shorterlink.com/?47TBP8>
Feeling a draft? <http://shorterlink.com/?930B5U>
For the facts on Iraq, see <http://optruth.org>.

'Al Qaeda' is Al CIA-Duh. A lot of people are waking up to that fact.

Name the place where Al Qaeda has struck that wasn't of immediate benefit
to Bush and the neo-cons who have taken over the US? 9/11 of course. The
Madrid bombings. The bombings in Turkey when Bush was in the UK. (btw, the
Madrid bombings produced the wrong outcome for the Bush administration: the
Socialists won. That enabled the Bush team to spin the tale that the
Socialists were behind the bombings.)

Scott
http://www.911Hoax.com


"Dori A Schmetterling" > wrote in message
...
> The OP might be a troll but it is an interesting topic nevertheless.
>
> Actually there were a couple of programmes on UK TV the other week that
put
> forward this contention that 'Al Quaeda' is not all-encompassing
> organisation and that the way it has been built up and used by governments
> to pass laws limiting civil liberties is quite Orwellian.
>
> There are groups of terrorists (obviously) but they act independently or,
at
> least, autonomously. The US and other governments handed certain
terrorist
> leaders a golden opportunity and now quite a few people claim to act on
> behalf of this ubiquitous Al Quaeda.
>
> Frankly, however much I am acutely aware of terrorism and its dangers I
have
> always had my doubts about this 'organisation'. The US and then the
British
> forces found absolutely nothing in Tora Bora (or wherever it was they were
> looking in Afghanistan) and there was no evidence of some network of caves
> in the Afghan hills.
>
> In my opinion it would, in any case, have taken years of construction to
> build such a thing, with great effort, since it was in the middle of
> nowhere. Use of explosives would probably have been detected. Otherwise,
> digging by hand would have taken even longer and perhaps large groups of
> people and that would have been detected also.
>
> Etc etc.
>
> DAS
>
> For direct contact replace nospam with schmetterling
> ---
>
> "Jeff Strickland" > wrote in message
> ...
> >
> > "tech27" > wrote in message
> > o.verio.net...
> >> Not exactly. The theory is that Al Qaeda does exist, but it is made up
of
> >> all those Holocaust "victims" that never really died.
> >
> >
> > Wouldn't the youngest holocaust victims that never really died be
> > approaching 70 years of age by now?
> >
> > Maybe it's just me, but I am not sure how much damage a person can do
that
> > can barely get out of bed in the morning.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>

I think the terms al-Qaida and asshole are completely interchangeable.

Well no, that isn't true, all al Qaida are assholes, but all assholes are
not al Qaida. I think there is an aversion to calling people assholes in the
media, so they call them al Qaida instead.




"Dori A Schmetterling" > wrote in message
...
> The OP might be a troll but it is an interesting topic nevertheless.
>
> Actually there were a couple of programmes on UK TV the other week that
put
> forward this contention that 'Al Quaeda' is not all-encompassing
> organisation and that the way it has been built up and used by governments
> to pass laws limiting civil liberties is quite Orwellian.
>
> There are groups of terrorists (obviously) but they act independently or,
at
> least, autonomously. The US and other governments handed certain
terrorist
> leaders a golden opportunity and now quite a few people claim to act on
> behalf of this ubiquitous Al Quaeda.
>
> Frankly, however much I am acutely aware of terrorism and its dangers I
have
> always had my doubts about this 'organisation'. The US and then the
British
> forces found absolutely nothing in Tora Bora (or wherever it was they were
> looking in Afghanistan) and there was no evidence of some network of caves
> in the Afghan hills.
>
> In my opinion it would, in any case, have taken years of construction to
> build such a thing, with great effort, since it was in the middle of
> nowhere. Use of explosives would probably have been detected. Otherwise,
> digging by hand would have taken even longer and perhaps large groups of
> people and that would have been detected also.
>
> Etc etc.
>
> DAS
>
> For direct contact replace nospam with schmetterling
> ---
>
> "Jeff Strickland" > wrote in message
> ...
> >
> > "tech27" > wrote in message
> > o.verio.net...
> >> Not exactly. The theory is that Al Qaeda does exist, but it is made up
of
> >> all those Holocaust "victims" that never really died.
> >
> >
> > Wouldn't the youngest holocaust victims that never really died be
> > approaching 70 years of age by now?
> >
> > Maybe it's just me, but I am not sure how much damage a person can do
that
> > can barely get out of bed in the morning.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>