Notice: Nominations for RAMFM coordinator?

I think you'll get your wishes. I don't think anyone wants or cares to
try....

On-topic, are your mufflers the newer Flomaster three-chambered ones?

I'll be replacing the exhaust if I do the blower install next year.
Just curious...

wrote:
> Amen! And unmoderated it shall remain I hope!
>
> --
> A happy kid behind the wheel of a 98 Mustang GT
> Cold air intake
> FRPP 3.73 gears
> Steeda Tri-Ax Shifter
> Flowmaster 40 Series mufflers (self-installed woohoo)
> Hi-speed fan switch
> 255/60R-15 rear tires
> Subframe connectors
>
>
> "Joe" > wrote in message
> ...
>
>>Bottom line on unmoderated newsgroups: You can call whomever you want
>>whatever you want, but in reality nobody's got the power to do
>>anything. Nominating and electing people for this and that may be
>>social fun and all, but it's got nothing to do with controlling the
>>newsgroup. Nobody controls it - it's unmoderated.
>>
>>Joe
>>Calypso Green '93 5.0 LX AOD hatch with a few goodies
>>Black '03 Dakota 5.9 R/T CC
>>
>>
>>Wound Up > wrote in
:
>>
>>
>>>Backyard Mechanic wrote:
>>>
>>>>Wound Up opined
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>Anyone else?
>>>>>
>>>>>Why single out Bill S.? I Googled my own old posts to this group a
>>>>>few weeks back, some from 7-8 years ago, and in my estimation he
>>>>>was then and is now a fine fellow, if you're not just cruisin for a
>>>>>bruisin to begin with.
>>>>>
>>>>>This is perfectly in the spirit of the current RAMFM. Garth
>>>>>(really nice guy) doesn't want it, and no one else seems to care.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>I didnt really single him out...I made an observation. But it's
>>>>true, nothing attracts flamers like an active "moderator"
>>>>
>>>>And I dont want it either, that's why I nom'd Garth... and because
>>>>I have been known to get ornery once in a while.
>>>>
>>>>But i disagree with you on the state of the group... go back to the
>>>>beginning* Not too much different in content, just goes in cycles.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>* Remember the names?!!! like yesterday
>>>
>>>I've noticed that it's often the case moderated NGs are worse off
>>>for being so.
>>>
>>>Garth would have been a good choice. I'm noticed your ornery
>>>tendencies. And I'm sure you've noticed my insane tendencies.
>>>
>>>If it does go in cycles, this is a definite low point on the curve,
>>>IMO.
>>> It just seemed that back then, there was more technical meatiness
>>> to
>>>this group.
>>>
>>>Thunder Alley... the mother of all loaded topics in RAMFM. Aside
>>>from saying it was entertaining to read, I'm going to leave that one
>>>be.
>>>
>>>I have leared a lot from people in this group. I have just had to
>>>wade through lakes of marshmallow fluff in order to do so.
>>>
>>>I don't really care who the moderator is, but in my estimation, he
>>>or she should have a very solid command of The Art of Usenet Prose
>>>in order to hope to have a chance of survival when things get
>>>prickly.
>>>
>>>
>>>>- - - - - - - -- - - - -
>>>>
>>>>Get this!!!
>>>>
>>>>|> 5. Prediction: If the Mustang returns to the sales levels of
>>>>|> 1991-92,
>>>>then
>>>>|> it is dead. The rear-drive Mustang will be too expensive for
>>>>|> "Front-Drive-Ford" to produce for less than 100,000 cars per
>>>>|> year. Make no mistake about it; Ford is not sentimental. If the
>>>>|> dollars aren't there for them, they will kill it in a heartbeat.
>>>>|> (no Chevy reference implied ;-)
>>>>
>>>>I doubt it.. The Mustang (and Thunderbird) are fundamental to what
>>>>Ford is. I expect Ford to move to a single rear-drive V-8 platform
>>>>for the Mustang, Thunderbird, Lincoln Mark IX, and an unnamed small
>>>>Jaguar and small Lincoln.. (this is all speculated upon/discussed
>>>>in this month's Automobile magazine..)
>>>>
>>>>- Robert W. Hall Aug 8, 1996
>>>>
>>>>Full Thread... also look at sales figures:
>>>>http://tinyurl.com/63l4c
>>>
>>>
>
>


--
Wound Up J

1967 Mustang coupe, restored & modified

Remove "put her" to reply in that bucket

Nah, they're the 2 chambered version. Sound hot though!

-Mike

--
A happy kid behind the wheel of a 98 Mustang GT
Cold air intake
FRPP 3.73 gears
Steeda Tri-Ax Shifter
Flowmaster 40 Series mufflers (self-installed woohoo)
Hi-speed fan switch
255/60R-15 rear tires
Subframe connectors


"Wound Up" > wrote in message
...
> I think you'll get your wishes. I don't think anyone wants or cares to
> try....
>
> On-topic, are your mufflers the newer Flomaster three-chambered ones?
>
> I'll be replacing the exhaust if I do the blower install next year.
> Just curious...
>
> wrote:
> > Amen! And unmoderated it shall remain I hope!
> >
> > --
> > A happy kid behind the wheel of a 98 Mustang GT
> > Cold air intake
> > FRPP 3.73 gears
> > Steeda Tri-Ax Shifter
> > Flowmaster 40 Series mufflers (self-installed woohoo)
> > Hi-speed fan switch
> > 255/60R-15 rear tires
> > Subframe connectors
> >
> >
> > "Joe" > wrote in message
> > ...
> >
> >>Bottom line on unmoderated newsgroups: You can call whomever you want
> >>whatever you want, but in reality nobody's got the power to do
> >>anything. Nominating and electing people for this and that may be
> >>social fun and all, but it's got nothing to do with controlling the
> >>newsgroup. Nobody controls it - it's unmoderated.
> >>
> >>Joe
> >>Calypso Green '93 5.0 LX AOD hatch with a few goodies
> >>Black '03 Dakota 5.9 R/T CC
> >>
> >>
> >>Wound Up > wrote in
> :
> >>
> >>
> >>>Backyard Mechanic wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>Wound Up opined
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>>Anyone else?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Why single out Bill S.? I Googled my own old posts to this group a
> >>>>>few weeks back, some from 7-8 years ago, and in my estimation he
> >>>>>was then and is now a fine fellow, if you're not just cruisin for a
> >>>>>bruisin to begin with.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>This is perfectly in the spirit of the current RAMFM. Garth
> >>>>>(really nice guy) doesn't want it, and no one else seems to care.
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>I didnt really single him out...I made an observation. But it's
> >>>>true, nothing attracts flamers like an active "moderator"
> >>>>
> >>>>And I dont want it either, that's why I nom'd Garth... and because
> >>>>I have been known to get ornery once in a while.
> >>>>
> >>>>But i disagree with you on the state of the group... go back to the
> >>>>beginning* Not too much different in content, just goes in cycles.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>* Remember the names?!!! like yesterday
> >>>
> >>>I've noticed that it's often the case moderated NGs are worse off
> >>>for being so.
> >>>
> >>>Garth would have been a good choice. I'm noticed your ornery
> >>>tendencies. And I'm sure you've noticed my insane tendencies.
> >>>
> >>>If it does go in cycles, this is a definite low point on the curve,
> >>>IMO.
> >>> It just seemed that back then, there was more technical meatiness
> >>> to
> >>>this group.
> >>>
> >>>Thunder Alley... the mother of all loaded topics in RAMFM. Aside
> >>>from saying it was entertaining to read, I'm going to leave that one
> >>>be.
> >>>
> >>>I have leared a lot from people in this group. I have just had to
> >>>wade through lakes of marshmallow fluff in order to do so.
> >>>
> >>>I don't really care who the moderator is, but in my estimation, he
> >>>or she should have a very solid command of The Art of Usenet Prose
> >>>in order to hope to have a chance of survival when things get
> >>>prickly.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>- - - - - - - -- - - - -
> >>>>
> >>>>Get this!!!
> >>>>
> >>>>|> 5. Prediction: If the Mustang returns to the sales levels of
> >>>>|> 1991-92,
> >>>>then
> >>>>|> it is dead. The rear-drive Mustang will be too expensive for
> >>>>|> "Front-Drive-Ford" to produce for less than 100,000 cars per
> >>>>|> year. Make no mistake about it; Ford is not sentimental. If the
> >>>>|> dollars aren't there for them, they will kill it in a heartbeat.
> >>>>|> (no Chevy reference implied ;-)
> >>>>
> >>>>I doubt it.. The Mustang (and Thunderbird) are fundamental to what
> >>>>Ford is. I expect Ford to move to a single rear-drive V-8 platform
> >>>>for the Mustang, Thunderbird, Lincoln Mark IX, and an unnamed small
> >>>>Jaguar and small Lincoln.. (this is all speculated upon/discussed
> >>>>in this month's Automobile magazine..)
> >>>>
> >>>>- Robert W. Hall Aug 8, 1996
> >>>>
> >>>>Full Thread... also look at sales figures:
> >>>>http://tinyurl.com/63l4c
> >>>
> >>>
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Wound Up J
>
> 1967 Mustang coupe, restored & modified
>
> Remove "put her" to reply in that bucket
>

Also... I bought a new welder (WF2000 by Campbell Hausfeld--still lower
quality compared to Lincoln, Miller, etc--but I'm just a hobbyist). It's a
wire-feed welder & I must say... MUCH better and easier to use than stick
welding. I got a couple exhaust hangers welded in now... so exhaust is
reaaaaal stable. *phew* on that. Now if I could just get this stinkin
ignition problem fixed!

-Mike

--
A happy kid behind the wheel of a 98 Mustang GT
Cold air intake
FRPP 3.73 gears
Steeda Tri-Ax Shifter
Flowmaster 40 Series mufflers (self-installed woohoo)
Hi-speed fan switch
255/60R-15 rear tires
Subframe connectors


"Wound Up" > wrote in message
...
> I think you'll get your wishes. I don't think anyone wants or cares to
> try....
>
> On-topic, are your mufflers the newer Flomaster three-chambered ones?
>
> I'll be replacing the exhaust if I do the blower install next year.
> Just curious...
>
> wrote:
> > Amen! And unmoderated it shall remain I hope!
> >
> > --
> > A happy kid behind the wheel of a 98 Mustang GT
> > Cold air intake
> > FRPP 3.73 gears
> > Steeda Tri-Ax Shifter
> > Flowmaster 40 Series mufflers (self-installed woohoo)
> > Hi-speed fan switch
> > 255/60R-15 rear tires
> > Subframe connectors
> >
> >
> > "Joe" > wrote in message
> > ...
> >
> >>Bottom line on unmoderated newsgroups: You can call whomever you want
> >>whatever you want, but in reality nobody's got the power to do
> >>anything. Nominating and electing people for this and that may be
> >>social fun and all, but it's got nothing to do with controlling the
> >>newsgroup. Nobody controls it - it's unmoderated.
> >>
> >>Joe
> >>Calypso Green '93 5.0 LX AOD hatch with a few goodies
> >>Black '03 Dakota 5.9 R/T CC
> >>
> >>
> >>Wound Up > wrote in
> :
> >>
> >>
> >>>Backyard Mechanic wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>Wound Up opined
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>>Anyone else?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Why single out Bill S.? I Googled my own old posts to this group a
> >>>>>few weeks back, some from 7-8 years ago, and in my estimation he
> >>>>>was then and is now a fine fellow, if you're not just cruisin for a
> >>>>>bruisin to begin with.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>This is perfectly in the spirit of the current RAMFM. Garth
> >>>>>(really nice guy) doesn't want it, and no one else seems to care.
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>I didnt really single him out...I made an observation. But it's
> >>>>true, nothing attracts flamers like an active "moderator"
> >>>>
> >>>>And I dont want it either, that's why I nom'd Garth... and because
> >>>>I have been known to get ornery once in a while.
> >>>>
> >>>>But i disagree with you on the state of the group... go back to the
> >>>>beginning* Not too much different in content, just goes in cycles.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>* Remember the names?!!! like yesterday
> >>>
> >>>I've noticed that it's often the case moderated NGs are worse off
> >>>for being so.
> >>>
> >>>Garth would have been a good choice. I'm noticed your ornery
> >>>tendencies. And I'm sure you've noticed my insane tendencies.
> >>>
> >>>If it does go in cycles, this is a definite low point on the curve,
> >>>IMO.
> >>> It just seemed that back then, there was more technical meatiness
> >>> to
> >>>this group.
> >>>
> >>>Thunder Alley... the mother of all loaded topics in RAMFM. Aside
> >>>from saying it was entertaining to read, I'm going to leave that one
> >>>be.
> >>>
> >>>I have leared a lot from people in this group. I have just had to
> >>>wade through lakes of marshmallow fluff in order to do so.
> >>>
> >>>I don't really care who the moderator is, but in my estimation, he
> >>>or she should have a very solid command of The Art of Usenet Prose
> >>>in order to hope to have a chance of survival when things get
> >>>prickly.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>- - - - - - - -- - - - -
> >>>>
> >>>>Get this!!!
> >>>>
> >>>>|> 5. Prediction: If the Mustang returns to the sales levels of
> >>>>|> 1991-92,
> >>>>then
> >>>>|> it is dead. The rear-drive Mustang will be too expensive for
> >>>>|> "Front-Drive-Ford" to produce for less than 100,000 cars per
> >>>>|> year. Make no mistake about it; Ford is not sentimental. If the
> >>>>|> dollars aren't there for them, they will kill it in a heartbeat.
> >>>>|> (no Chevy reference implied ;-)
> >>>>
> >>>>I doubt it.. The Mustang (and Thunderbird) are fundamental to what
> >>>>Ford is. I expect Ford to move to a single rear-drive V-8 platform
> >>>>for the Mustang, Thunderbird, Lincoln Mark IX, and an unnamed small
> >>>>Jaguar and small Lincoln.. (this is all speculated upon/discussed
> >>>>in this month's Automobile magazine..)
> >>>>
> >>>>- Robert W. Hall Aug 8, 1996
> >>>>
> >>>>Full Thread... also look at sales figures:
> >>>>http://tinyurl.com/63l4c
> >>>
> >>>
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Wound Up J
>
> 1967 Mustang coupe, restored & modified
>
> Remove "put her" to reply in that bucket
>