If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Repost__121112__DVD01 by Autos - "1940 oldsmobile-03 =Vintage.jpg" 316.8 KBytes
|
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Govt officials call for lowering drunk driving threshold to BAC of .05
The auto industry will fight this since they love car crashes. Car crashes mean car sales. Obozo will fight it since his beloved daddy was a serial drunk driver who once killed a man. http://www.washingtonpost.com/politi...f7c_story.html US officials recommend lowering drunken driving threshold to .05 blood alcohol to save lives - The Washington Post WASHINGTON — States should cut their threshold for drunken driving by nearly half— from .08 blood alcohol level to .05_matching a standard that has substantially reduced highway deaths in other countries, a federal safety board recommended Tuesday. That’s about one drink for a woman weighing less than 120 pounds, two for a 160-pound man. More than 100 countries have adopted the .05 alcohol content standard or lower, according to a report by the staff of the National Transportation Safety Board. In Europe, the share of traffic deaths attributable to drunken driving was reduced by more than half within 10 years after the standard was dropped, the report said. NTSB officials said it wasn’t their intention to prevent drivers from having a glass of wine with dinner, but they acknowledged that under a threshold as low as .05 the safest thing for people who have only one or two drinks is not to drive at all. A drink is defined as 12 ounces of beer, 4 ounces of wine, or 1 ounce of 80-proof alcohol in most studies __________________ Reckless drivers are a bigger threat to you than all other criminals put together! NAACP = Negro Affirmative Action, Caucasian Persecution |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Govt officials call for lowering drunk driving threshold to BACof .05
This would undoubtedly prevent thousands of highway killings every
year. Same with lowering the speed limit to 55 and banning cell phones in cars. But the idiot public says "Hell with it. It's more important to combat terrorism" even though bee stings kill more americans than terrorism. __________________ Reckless drivers are a bigger threat to you than all other criminals put together! NAACP = Negro Affirmative Action, Caucasian Persecution |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Govt officials call for lowering drunk driving threshold to BAC of .05
On Wed, 15 May 2013 09:49:27 -0700 (PDT), "Criminal Drivers Murder
35,000 Americans a Year" > wrote: >This would undoubtedly prevent thousands of highway killings every >year. Aren't the majority of highway deaths due to speeding and road conditions, not drunk driving? I don't have the stats on hand, and I don't feel like looking them up (you need to prove your claim, I don't need to disprove it), but drunk drivers are often on city streets. And yes, I am aware some are on highways. But I still question your claim. >Same with lowering the speed limit to 55 and banning cell phones >in cars. But the idiot public says "Hell with it. It's more important >to combat terrorism" even though bee stings kill more americans than >terrorism. I don't see the connection. Terrorism is dealt with on a federal level, while speed limits are a state matter. -- "Pulled pork tacos. "Greasy, messy, pulled pork tacos." -- Chuck Bryant |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Govt officials call for lowering drunk driving threshold to BACof .05
Police are already unable to stop drivers
who are absolutely pickled and stagger out of large bars and drive away. Police DO NOT focus on people leaving large bars. Apparently focusing on people leaving a bar would be seen as entrapment or unfair somehow. I don't buy it but that's what a cop told me. This .05 BAC proposal would enable Police to waste time on the "small fish" yet show an impressive score sheet for arresting "drunk drivers". Instead of busting the SERIOUSLY drunk drivers cops would be more busy wasting time on the "small fish". Wouldn't our streets be safer if the BAC limit was put at .10 but seriously and severely enforced? Instead of criminalizing tens of thousands of lightweights, why not focus more on the few hardcore drunks and repeat offenders who actually do the worst damage? Who is the obsessive OP and why do they seem to be so completely unaware of the real world? Aspies much? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Govt officials call for lowering drunk driving threshold to BACof .05
On May 16, 9:45*am, Greegor > wrote:
.. > > Police DO NOT focus on people leaving large bars. > Apparently focusing on people leaving a bar > would be seen as entrapment or unfair somehow. > I don't buy it but that's what a cop told me. Entrapment? HAHAHA. Did you really say that.? You fish where the fish are. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Govt officials call for lowering drunk driving threshold to BACof .05
On May 16, 11:38*am, "Criminal Drivers Murder 35,000 Americans a Year"
> wrote: > On May 16, 9:45*am, Greegor > wrote: > . > > > > > Police DO NOT focus on people leaving large bars. > > Apparently focusing on people leaving a bar > > would be seen as entrapment or unfair somehow. > > I don't buy it but that's what a cop told me. > Entrapment? *HAHAHA. > Did you really say that.? I didn't say it, a cop did. Reading comprehension problems? > You fish where the fish are. Maybe one of the other cops owned the bar, was getting paid by the bar or a cops brother owns the bar? Selective enforcement for such reasons is not unusual. BAC standards are state laws, but purchased by federal authorities in exchange for Federal Highway funding. It's a "states right" that is purchased from each state with Federal Highway money. That is exactly how the .08 BAC was enacted in US state after US state across the country BY THE FEDS. This is not the only situation where the FEDS bought state laws like this. This modus operandi raises questions about the value and the very nature of "states rights". |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Govt officials call for lowering drunk driving threshold to BAC of .05
Greegor wrote:
> Police are already unable to stop drivers > who are absolutely pickled and stagger > out of large bars and drive away. > > Police DO NOT focus on people leaving large bars. > Apparently focusing on people leaving a bar > would be seen as entrapment or unfair somehow. > I don't buy it but that's what a cop told me. > > This .05 BAC proposal would enable Police > to waste time on the "small fish" yet show > an impressive score sheet for arresting > "drunk drivers". > > Instead of busting the SERIOUSLY drunk drivers > cops would be more busy wasting time on the > "small fish". > > Wouldn't our streets be safer if the BAC limit > was put at .10 but seriously and severely enforced? > > Instead of criminalizing tens of thousands of > lightweights, why not focus more on the few > hardcore drunks and repeat offenders who > actually do the worst damage? > > Who is the obsessive OP and why do > they seem to be so completely unaware > of the real world? Aspies much? Depends on where you live. The police stopped and ticketed a friend of mine once for staggering out of a bar and,.....Walking home! He knew he was too drunk to drive, and only lived about four blocks from the bar, so he walked. The cops got him for being drunk in public. This was, (of course) in California, the most liberal place in the world. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Govt officials call for lowering drunk driving threshold to BACof .05
On May 16, 1:53*pm, Greegor > wrote:
> On May 16, 11:38*am, "Criminal Drivers Murder 35,000 Americans a Year" > > > wrote: > > On May 16, 9:45*am, Greegor > wrote: > > . > > > > Police DO NOT focus on people leaving large bars. > > > Apparently focusing on people leaving a bar > > > would be seen as entrapment or unfair somehow. > > > I don't buy it but that's what a cop told me. > > Entrapment? *HAHAHA. > > Did you really say that.? > > I didn't say it, a cop did. > Reading comprehension problems? > > > You fish where the fish are. > > Maybe one of the other cops owned > the bar, was getting paid by the bar > or a cops brother owns the bar? > > Selective enforcement for such reasons > is not unusual. > > BAC standards are state laws, but > purchased by federal authorities in > exchange for Federal Highway funding. > > It's a "states right" that is purchased from > each state with Federal Highway money. > > That is exactly how the .08 BAC was enacted > in US state after US state across the country > BY THE FEDS. > > This is not the only situation where > the FEDS bought state laws like this. > > This modus operandi raises questions > about the value and the very nature > of "states rights". I agree DUI is a state issue and the feds should stay out of it. Federal DUI laws are clearly unconstitutional but then, that's true of 95% of federal laws. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Govt officials call for lowering drunk driving threshold to BACof .05
On May 16, 5:18*pm, "Bill Graham" > wrote:
> > Depends on where you live. The police stopped and ticketed a friend of mine > once for staggering out of a bar and,.....Walking home! He knew he was too > drunk to drive, and only lived about four blocks from the bar, so he walked. > The cops got him for being drunk in public. This was, (of course) in > California, the most liberal place in the world. Sounds good to me. We must stop ALL drunk drivers, even innocent ones. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Drunk Driving | Marcus[_6_] | Driving | 9 | August 21st 11 08:16 PM |
dRuNk dRIviNG iS FuN | Chronocidal Charlie | Driving | 1 | January 11th 09 09:23 PM |
Should SUV Driving amount to Drunk Driving? | donquijote1954 | Driving | 299 | January 3rd 08 11:58 PM |
Ravens QB McNair charged w drunk-driving though not drunk and notdriving | Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS[_1_] | Driving | 5 | May 17th 07 01:21 AM |
Closest call (driving) you've ever had | [email protected] | Driving | 5 | March 14th 06 12:38 AM |