A Cars forum. AutoBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AutoBanter forum » Auto newsgroups » Driving
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

How to **** Off an Arrogant Pedalcyclist



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old June 9th 05, 02:32 PM
Jim Yanik
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

(Brent P) wrote in
:

> In article >, Jim Yanik
> wrote:
>
>>> Yes I admit that taxation is often not logical.

>>
>> That is not what you wrote.Your words;"It's a tax." referrring to
>> license plate "renewals".

>
> So are speeding tickets for the most part. So is social security.
>
>> Your registration does not wear out,fade away,or change over time,so
>> the only reason for "renewal" is a *user fee*,no other reason.

>
> I have to pay all sorts of taxes annually. that doesn't make them user
> fees.


But the license "renewal fee" IS a user fee,it gives you license to USE the
roads;no pay,no use.

>
>> It may be small,but applied to millions of autos per state,it adds up
>> to a nice piece of change.

>
> certainly not enough to cover unlimited usage.


So what? why does it HAVE to "cover" unlimited usage?

> Unlimited cellphone
> packages cost many, many times more.
>
>>>> Much of what gov't does does not make sense.
>>>
>>> BINGO. hence it's not a user fee just because it has to be paid
>>> every years.

>>
>> Sure it is a user fee;the "renewal" sticker is your tax stamp,just
>> like on cigarette packs.

>
> And cig taxes aren't user taxes for anything.


But I have not claimed that cig taxes are user fees.
I merely said that the sticker on the packs is a tax stamp.
>
>
>>>> Check your eyesight and have a new picture taken.
>>>> Licenses do wear out,or need updating.(Not so for your lic.plate.)
>>>> Maybe get you to pay any outstanding parking tickets,too.
>>>
>>> I've seen beaten up and worn license plates.

>>
>> Sure,due to bumping into things,and here in the South,even fading.
>> But not common enough to necessitate "renewal" EVERY YEAR.

>
> Oh well,,, back in the day they were replaced every year... go
> figure.
>
>> Florida sends me a new plate with a new number every 5 years,IIRC.
>> One nice thing is that if your FL.plate gets damaged in a collision
>> or stolen,you can get a new plate FREE.You need a police report
>> reference number,though.Oh,and the yearly FL plate "renewal" fees go
>> to the county TAX COLLECTOR.

>
> Not in IL. IL charges for new plates.
>
>
>>>>> Are you going to say that's a 'user fee' too?
>>>
>>>> In a way,yes.You are licensed -to use- a motor vehicle even if it
>>>> is not registered to you,like a rental,or another person's licensed
>>>> auto. Note that you need no driver's license if you operate
>>>> off-road,on private property.Same for lic.plates and registration.
>>>
>>> If government could figure out a way to tax it and control it on
>>> private property, they would.

>>
>> No,because it doesn't affect anyone in the public venue.

>
> That's why they can't. Remove that limitation on government and they
> damn well will tax it.
>
>>> You are simply pointing out a
>>> constitutional issue, and confusing it with paying-for-roads.

>
>> No,you simply refuse to acknowledge the obvious.

>
> The obvious is your being picky with tax labels for bicycling and not
> being so with autos.


You appear to tbe the "picky" one about labels.
I'm flexible enough to understand what is actually a user fee and what's
not.And honest enough about it.
>
>> License plate fees ARE a "user fee";for the *license to USE* the
>> vehicle on public roads.(state permission)

>
> Not that I have seen in the law.


You just refuse to see.(actually refuse to admit,I know you understand)
>
>> I suspect that if this were not part of the argument about licensing
>> bicycles for road use,you'd have admitted it to be a user fee long
>> ago.

>
> It's not a user fee in IL. I've had a car ticketed that was parked on
> private property for expired registration. It never left the property.


Due to LOCAL laws about junk or abandoned cars that are not garaged,but
left outside.Nothing to do with *using* it on your property.
Same thing happened to me with my first car that I built from two
junkers.(in NY)
I was still able to drive it around the yard legally.

> Bogus ticket, because the law doesn't require it, but the cops
> certainly don't share your interpetation of it as just a 'user fee'.





--
Jim Yanik
jyanik
at
kua.net
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Arrogant Pedalcyclists in Action John Harlow Driving 8 April 15th 05 01:55 AM
Go Ahead, Try to Justify This Pedalcyclist Behavior Laura Bush murdered her boy friend Driving 4 April 9th 05 07:05 PM
Arrogant Pedalcyclists in Training Brent P Driving 6 April 3rd 05 12:14 AM
Someone's Taking the Piss SteveH Alfa Romeo 11 July 30th 04 02:36 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:08 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AutoBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.