A Cars forum. AutoBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AutoBanter forum » Auto newsgroups » Driving
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Research claims women are idiots about cars



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 7th 06, 07:14 PM posted to rec.autos.driving,misc.transport.road,talk.politics.misc,alt.politics
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Research claims women are idiots about cars


http://www.manchesteronline.co.uk/me...ing_signs.html

Friday, 3rd March 2006
Women drivers 'miss warning signs'

BELT UP: Warnings missed.WOMEN drivers are dashboard dunces when it
comes to recognising warning symbols in their cars.

New research shows that one in two hasn't the foggiest idea of what
some dashboard signs mean.

Despite the average motorist spending 360 hours a year behind the
wheel, as many as 42 per cent of motorists cannot identify common
dashboard symbols, according to the poll by AA Personal Loans.

Almost half of women and one third of men could not correctly identify
symbols for frequently used functions or basic warning lights.

Researchers asked 1,700 drivers to identify symbols such as the
handbrake warning light, full beam headlight, front windscreen wash
and wipe and rear fog light.

The revelations show that 39 per cent of women and 28 per cent of men
were unable to correctly identify the warning lamp for the main beam
headlight warning lamp suggesting that they may regularly unwittingly
dazzle oncoming traffic.

Two thirds of women could not correctly identify the front windscreen
washer and wipe symbol, one in five admitting they had no idea what it
signified, compared to one in 20 men.

Handbrake

Just 38 per cent of women compared to 65 per cent of men were able to
correctly identify the warning lamp indicating high coolant
temperature - yet ignoring this could lead to engine damage.

Twelve per cent of women and seven per cent of men admitted they had
no idea what the handbrake warning light was. A third of women drivers
wrongly identified this symbol, compared to just on in five men.

More than two thirds of women and 44 per cent of men could not
correctly identify the rear fog light symbol, with one in five women
admitting to having no idea what it meant.

The most commonly identified symbol in the survey was the oil pressure
warning lamp.

A total of 85 per cent correctly identified this symbol, but women
still lagged behind men with 78 per cent being correctly able to
identify this symbol, compared to 91 per cent of men.

Lloyd East, ofAA Financial Services, said: "More women than men are
now buying second-hand motors.

"It's worrying so many female motorists are in the dark over some of
the most common dashboard symbols."




Ads
  #2  
Old March 7th 06, 09:38 PM posted to rec.autos.driving,misc.transport.road,talk.politics.misc,alt.politics
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Research claims women are idiots about cars

laura bush - VEHICULAR HOMICIDE urinated this:

> BELT UP: Warnings missed.WOMEN drivers are dashboard dunces when it
> comes to recognising warning symbols in their cars.



This coming from someone who can't even see the dashboard lights because
they burned out years ago! ROTFLMAO!

  #3  
Old March 9th 06, 05:26 PM posted to rec.autos.driving,misc.transport.road,talk.politics.misc,alt.politics
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Research claims women are idiots about cars


laura bush - VEHICULAR HOMICIDE wrote:
> http://www.manchesteronline.co.uk/me...ing_signs.html
>
> Friday, 3rd March 2006
> Women drivers 'miss warning signs'
>
> BELT UP: Warnings missed.WOMEN drivers are dashboard dunces when it
> comes to recognising warning symbols in their cars.
>


The title and opening statement are inconsistent and the article itself
is pretty much useless sensationalism. There is no indication in the
article that women are missing the warning signs. The article simply
says in several paragraphs women (and men) have not committed a long
list of symbols and definitions to rote memory. The article skips over
the truly important question of whether the driver misses or ignores a
warning light that flashes on. A more meaningful study would be to
find out how many women (and men) responded to a warning light by
finding out what it meant and by taking the proper action.

The resulting article would not be nearly as sensational and sell far
fewer papers, but would be far more informative of driver habits.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
HEMI's HOT Luke Smith Driving 208 December 19th 04 05:27 PM
Vintage Cars Get Hot with Makeovers Grover C. McCoury III Ford Mustang 2 December 5th 04 04:13 AM
European Cars Least Reliable Richard Schulman VW water cooled 3 November 11th 04 09:41 AM
FS: 1991 "Classic Cars" (Of The World) Cards with Box J.R. Sinclair General 0 May 27th 04 07:31 AM
Women driven cars aniram General 43 April 8th 04 06:51 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AutoBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.