Thread
:
MIKE Hunter's smaller car thesis??
View Single Post
#
155
July 25th 07, 01:13 AM posted to alt.autos.toyota,alt.autos.toyota.trucks,rec.autos.makers.honda,alt.autos.honda,sci.energy
Viperkiller
external usenet poster
Posts: 1
MIKE Hunter's smal car v large car thesis is correct
On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 01:28:51 GMT, Josh S > wrote:
>In article .com>,
>
wrote:
>
>> Jeff wrote:
>> > Mike Hunter wrote:
>>
>> > > I am retired now and what I do have is fifteen years of
>> > > my thirty years experience, as an automotive structural
>> > > design engineer, designing automobile crumple zones
>> > > and test crashing hundreds of all types of vehicles and
>> > > observing the result on crash dummies.
>> >
>> > From your comments, it looks like you volunteered at one point. That
>> > would explain your brain damage. ;-)
>>
>> Mike is an idiot savant who knows everything about cars and absolutely
>> nothing about anything else. Sound engineering, insane politics.
>He probably has most of his money invested in GM, the company that just
>loves making big profit on big SUVs.
As a point of fact, it seems more vested in Ford. Either way, he's on
the loosing end.
Viperkiller
View Public Profile
View message headers
Find all posts by Viperkiller
Find all threads started by Viperkiller
Ads