Thread: MIKE Hunter's smaller car thesis??
View Single Post
  #151  
Old July 24th 07, 02:28 AM posted to alt.autos.toyota,alt.autos.toyota.trucks,rec.autos.makers.honda,alt.autos.honda,sci.energy
Josh S
external usenet poster
  
Posts: 190
Default MIKE Hunter's smal car v large car thesis is correct
In article .com>,
wrote:

> Jeff wrote:
> > Mike Hunter wrote:
>
> > > I am retired now and what I do have is fifteen years of
> > > my thirty years experience, as an automotive structural
> > > design engineer, designing automobile crumple zones
> > > and test crashing hundreds of all types of vehicles and
> > > observing the result on crash dummies.
> >
> > From your comments, it looks like you volunteered at one point. That
> > would explain your brain damage. ;-)
>
> Mike is an idiot savant who knows everything about cars and absolutely
> nothing about anything else. Sound engineering, insane politics.
He probably has most of his money invested in GM, the company that just
loves making big profit on big SUVs.
Ads