Speaking of U.S. inventions, what do you think the U.N. is - any idiot
can see the U.N. is simply something for the U.S. to divert attention away
from itself with.

Like dago democracy seeks to con the people into thinking they get a say
in things down at the ballot box, the U.N. creates the illusion that a body
other than the U.S. is running the show here on earth - big jokes these.

Mostly, the U.N. is a U.S. puppet but the U.S. has demonstrated that
their approval is only nice, not neccessary. It's pointless to refer to
people as criminals when you simply don't have the power to arrest them.


"alex martini" > wrote in message
...
> Well not that I have any intention of continuing this but one little
> point; the ceasefire agreement was with the UN - not the US. The UN did
> NOT sanction war, you did. Therefore your war is illegal. What is more,
> the ceasfire terms were that Iraq disarmed; at the UN, Iraq said they had
> disarmed and the UN weapons inspectors concurred (as opposed to conquered,
> which the US did). Therefore the war was illegal; the only people saying
> Iraq had WMD was the White House - they even said, in what will go down in
> history as the momentous lie since Hitler's pledge in Munich - to have
> 'evidence' of WMD in Iraq. Iraq was disarmed; there were no WMD. The US
> lied. And then invaded, in stark violation of the UN charter and therefore
> in breach of international law and, therefore, this war was, is and ever
> shall remain Illegal.
> "Randy Magruder" > wrote in message
> ...
>> John Wallace wrote:
>>
>>> Randy Magruder wrote:
>>>
>>> > History didn't begin when you woke up this morning. Why don't you
>>> > actually go back and read the transcript of Bush's 2002 State of the
>>> > Union speech. You'll find a LOT more there than WMD.
>>>
>>> The legal right to go to war is nothing to do with Bush's SOU
>>> address. It is solely to do with the UN resolutions, and whether or
>>> not Iraq possessed WMD. It doesn't matter if Bush is ****ed off that
>>> Saddam drives a Japanese car, or prefers Pepsi over Coke, no WMD =
>>> illegal war.
>>>
>>> Bush can practice all the revisionist history he wants and cite a
>>> bajillion other reasons - that doesn't give them meaning.
>>
>> John, while you're looking up my private e-mail address to continue
>> this, you might also read the definition of "Ceasefire agreement".
>>
>> Later. I won't answer any more of your posts HERE
>>
>> Randy
>
>