On Wednesday, September 4, 2013 7:13:40 AM UTC+3, jim beam wrote:
> On 09/03/2013 08:48 PM, T0m $herman wrote:
>
> > On 9/3/2013 10:20 PM, jim beam wrote:
>
> >> On 09/03/2013 08:10 PM, T0m $herman wrote:
>
> >>> On 9/3/2013 8:23 PM, jim beam wrote:
>
> >>>
>
> >>>> see above retard. now, stop avoiding the question - go find a single
>
> >>>> rear engine car with less than 16" of crush space out front.
>
> >>>>
>
> >>>>
>
> >>> VW Type II?
>
> >>>
>
> >>> <http://silodrome.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Volkswagen-Type-2-Kombi-Van.jpg>
>
> >>>
>
> >>>
>
> >>>
>
> >>>
>
> >>
>
> >> yeah, not the best. #12 in that diagram is a freakin' unfunny JOKE.
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> > As a child in Quebec City, I spent time in the back of a VW Type IV -
>
> > snowmobile suit, mittens and boots were mandatory for any trip over 15
>
> > minutes long, even with the optional auxiliary heater.
>
> >
>
>
>
> can't imagine. i had to wear every single piece of clothing i owned,
>
> including socks over my shoes, and that was just in oregon/seattle.
>
beats me how you survive in the giant air conditioner by the bay

so you were implying never buy /read jobst book or that was not was
you implying?

I have other people do the wheel assembly and tensioning for me so I wonder
about the need vs want vs just for laughs

besides, I think I'll go mtb where wheel quality is of lesser importance
than on a road bike