Joe wrote:
> "Michael Johnson, PE" > wrote in
> news >
>> dwight wrote:
>>> "Joe" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> Michael Johnson > wrote in news:bd-
>>>> :
>>>>
>>>>> Looks like GM is considering buying "C" from from "DC". Makes me
>>>>> wonder what chassis will GM use for the 300C, Crossfire etc. if the
>>>>> sale goes through. Here's a link: http://tinyurl.com/2m5lsq
>>>> Been reading this stuff - it will certainly be interesting to see
>>>> what shakes out before this is all over.
>>>>
>>>> I can see a Hemi Camaro or an LS7 Challenger...
>>> I don't see it...
>
> Guys, I must stress the fact that there's a winky at the end of the line
> above.

What!?!?!? You're not serious?

>>> Given its line-up, or the possible new entries they "could" build, I
>>> can't figure out why Chrysler isn't rolling in money. It should be
>>> Chrysler buying GM, not a near-bankrupt GM trying to finance a buyout
>>> of Chrysler.
>> I would have thought Chrysler was solidly in the black too.
>
> Here's a recent story from CNN:
> http://tinyurl.com/yr4g3l
>
> Apparently, things ain't goin' so good.

The deal to sell Chrysler would have more hair on it than a gorilla. It
wouldn't surprise me if they never find a buyer.

>>> Hey, if it were me, I'd buy Chrysler, then dump Chrysler and just
>>> keep Jeep. Then I'd come out with the first-ever Jeep coupe, Jeep
>>> sedan, Jeep (true) station wagon.
>> Jeep is the reason Chrysler bought AMC. It certainly wasn't for the
>> AMC cars.
>
> Ramblers. Saw an awesome 390 AMX the other day.

My Mother drove around the the four-wheel drive Eagle compact (late 70s
vintage). It actually wasn't a bad car for the time.

>>> I'd make a fortune.
>> Remember your buddies here at ramfm when you get filthy rich.