JP Roberts wrote:
> The only one who is totally at odds with logic here is you, but that doesn't
> surprise me at all, given your poor record and credibility.

Lack of credibility with you? Heh. Lack of credibility with an
anti-Audi whiner is a badge of honor.

> Those who call truth their opinions are totally blind of what truth really
> is.

I agree. Good thing that I've never done that. You, on the other
hand...

> I can perfectly understand more phyisics that you ever would

Your demonstration of that "opinion" in this thread points more toward
the actual "truth" of the situation. Flatter Smith? He's right, and
you're wrong. No flattery, just a plain acknowledgement of the truth.

That'd be the real "truth," not your opinion dressed up as the truth.

> What you completely fail to understand is how short-minded your logic is.

Logic is logic. I realize it interferes with your self-pitying about
owning an Audi that actually required some work. Next time, buy a car
that doesn't require any repairs - problem solved!

> Your words are clearly below anyone's dignity so I will refuse to answer any
> more of your ill-bred comments.

And yet, here you are, doing your best to get your digs in. You can't
*wait* to come in and trade barbs, just like the impolite oaf that you
are. Then you complain because someone actually returns fire.
Hypocrite.

> The fact that you keep interfering with every thread taking it totally out
> of context every time and taking every little opportunity to pick on my
> every comment says it all about you and your poor education.

No, it shows how little I like ill-mannered folks such as yourself.
Got any more gems of logic there? LOL.

> You must be a very frustrated little piece of a man to show such poor
> behaviour, Mr GcmsShhhttyGdamGemischtChemist. Oh, God, what a preposterous
> username you have. Do I need more proof? LOL

And here you are, slinging mud. The irony is perfect. Did you even
think before you decided to have diarrhea at the keyboard?

> And let me take this opportunity to publicly state I will not be replying to
> any more of your ill-bred spurious comments, even if you keep insulting
> everyone in this very honourable newsgroup.

You calling me ill-bred is hilarious. I'm sure your parents would be
quite proud of the lout they unleashed on the world. Oddly, I don't
insult anyone be you - do you imagine yourself to be "the newsgroup?"
That's pretty arrogant. Not surprising at all from you.

No, I think I'll continue to point out your whinyness and lack of
logical thought. How you respond is your choice, of course.

Stick to the facts, oatmeal-for-brains, and you won't ever see me post
in response to you. Offer idiotic opinions unsupported by facts, and
I'll be there to correct you.

E.P.