Turned the tables on cops
In article
>,
gpsman > wrote:
> On Dec 23, 11:43*am, Harry K > wrote:
> > On Dec 22, 9:14*pm, gpsman > wrote:
> > > On Dec 21, 9:26*pm, Harry K > wrote:
> >
> > > > *It is hardly news but it does prove the point. *Follow any driver
> > > > long enough any a cop can find a legal reason to pull him over.
> >
> > > Define "long enough".
> >
> > As long as he wants? *Did you have a point?
>
> Yeah. I don't wander in my lane, so "long enough" would be too long
> to maintain the interest of anyone.
You wandered in your lane several times in the first minute of your
video...
>
> > > > Even
> > > > if not there is the old, *reliable
> > > > 'wandering in lane'. *"I saw him over the centerline/fogline twice in
> > > > a 1/2 mile". *Just try to prove you didn't.
> >
> > > You don't have to "prove" it, only create reasonable doubt.
> >
> > LOL and you think the judge will take _your_ word over the cop's. *You
> > must be living in a fantasy world.
>
> My chances of being cited are slim, probably not even by mistake, or
> by someone just being a dick. I know what to say to cops to avoid
> being cited for minor offenses.
>
> Plus, I have a CDL. Rumor has it cops tend to be reluctant to write
> truckers for minor offenses in a 4-wheeler.
> -----
>
> - gpsman
--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia
<http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg>
|