dizzy > wrote:

>Well, after 12 years of mostly problem-free service, my 2000 323 has
>succumbed to the dreaded "no reverse" problem. Damn it. I was hoping
>to get a few more years out of it.
>
>Now I have to decide if a car with a book value of only a few grand,
>and is starting to show the first signs of rust, is worth getting a
>new tranny.

Update: Evidence is pointing to my car having the GM tranny, not the
ZF, in which case it's only a selenoid. GM rules!