On 09/19/2013 08:56 PM, Brent wrote:
> On 2013-09-20, jim beam > wrote:
>> On 09/19/2013 08:22 PM, Brent wrote:
>>> On 2013-09-20, T0m $herman > wrote:
>>>> On 9/19/2013 9:59 PM, Brent wrote:
>>>>> slrn, at least the ancient version I use, does not have a spell checker.
>>>>> Neither does this ancient text editor. All terminal based stuff. And
>>>>> honestly you're not worth the time. If anything, consider the typos
>>>>> and spelling errors stereotypical proof of my background.
>>>>
>>>> Technical writing a lost skill?
>>>>
>>>> But what do I know - just because I get paid to edit engineering reports?
>>>
>>> Just the stereotype that engineers can't spell worth a damn. I have
>>> word processors and other things with real time spell checking for
>>> serious things.
>>
>> yet again dags. you'll see that slrn has a spell check invocation.
>> it's very simple. but you're TOO ****ING STOOOOOPID TO DO IT EVEN WHEN
>> POINTED OUT!
>
> Not the version I use, dumb****.
> Here's the documentation for a version newer than I use.
> http://slrn.sourceforge.net/docs/slrn-manual.html
>
> Why don't you point it out.

no, make some kind of freakin' effort to help your goddamned retarded
self. dags. it's right there, top 3 returns.


>
> Machine is old.

??? so ****ing what?


> I have better things to do than **** around to update
> the entire OS and install all the packages so it accepts newer versions
> of the same software just to get a spell checker to please you.

you're not doing it for me, retard, you're doing it for yourself. so
you don't look like a whiny incapable pathetic esl retard chump.


--
fact check required