View Single Post
  #39  
Old March 24th 05, 02:39 AM
jaybird
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"L Sternn" > wrote in message
...
> On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 15:26:57 GMT, "jaybird" > wrote:
>
>>
>>"Scott en Aztlán" > wrote in message
. ..
>>> On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 08:07:48 GMT, "jaybird" > wrote:
>>>
>>>>Of course he shouldn't be fired. He's an 18 year veteran with no prior
>>>>disciplinary action. I wouldn't wish a firing on anyone in any
>>>>profession
>>>>with that record, just based on a comment.
>>>
>>> While I am on record as agreeing with your position, it seems likely
>>> that he has been doing things like this for some time; this is merely
>>> the first time he got caught/somebody complained loudly enough. The
>>> article itself mentions that he was rude to some other callers, as
>>> well.
>>>
>>> This kind of negative attitude doesn't suddenly appear one day after
>>> an 18-year exemplary record; it has been YEARS in the making. Nor will
>>> it magically disappear after 15 days. I predict this officer will have
>>> future run-ins of a similar nature. And, of course, once he racks up
>>> enough of them he will eventually be fired for cause (or forced to
>>> retire or something).

>>
>>It's possible, but we don't really know that. I'm sure that most of us
>>here
>>are generally nice and respectful to others but we have our bad days.
>>I've
>>made comments before that I probably shouldn't have, as most of us have
>>done,

>
> The difference is most people are held accountable for things that
> they say and do.
>
> This cop could have been responsible for people dying, and you want to
> give him a pass.


I believe that even in the follow up articles it was stated that his
comments had no effect on the response time.

--
---
jaybird
---
I am not the cause of your problems.
My actions are the result of your actions.
Your life is not my fault.


Ads