dwight wrote:
> "Spike" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Better the crook go free than risk being sued seems to be the desire
>> of the liberal courts. Ya gotta wonder why any of us ever thought
>> about pinning on the badge and going forth to fight crime and/or evil.
>> The citizens, who have never walked in our shoes second guess what
>> should or should not have been done in that split second.
>>
>> Bad cops should be punished for stepping outside the bounds of moral
>> decency... whether it's graft or abusing the power of the badge. But
>> a lot of damn good cops have been lost to second guessing. Sadly, it
>> only takes a small percent to make all look bad.
>>
>> They say a camera doesn't lie, but what it records is dependent upon
>> the reviewer's bias, pro or con.
>>
>> Yep, I am biased in favor of the cops. I've walked in those shoes and
>> know how fast something can go from being nothing to a full blown war.
>
> Reading the articles, it seems as though the video squashed all debate. The
> majority obviously felt that the video alone was a compelling argument on
> the side of the police. Having watched it, I agree wholeheartedly.
>

Then I have to wonder how the hell did it end up going so far to
begin with?? Must have been yahoo's family on the jury.


--
"Yes, it is a good thing you are handy, as
you clearly suck at being smart." - Herb