dwight wrote:
> "Rich" > wrote in message
> ...
>> The traditional idea of a muscle car was a stripped-down product, with
>> power. In later years (1970-71) the muscle car version of a line
>> became almost a luxury vehicle. Now, Ford only knows that kind.
>> Check out the sticker on a convertible GT in Toronto, Canada.
>>
>> $45k, plus $3000 insurance (way more if you are younger) and $3000/yr
>> in gas means this car costs about the same as the mortgage to a medium-
>> priced condo or a cheap house.
>>
>> http://www.pbase.com/andersonrm/image/100830683
>
> Is there a point here? Are you somehow mad at Ford for not putting
> "muscle cars" in the hands of more young people?
>
> I don't get it.

This guy resides in my kill file because he is a low grade troll. He
posts the same worthless crap in the photography newsgroups and gets
slapped around their too.