Brent P wrote:
> In article >, Michael Johnson wrote:
>> Brent P wrote:
>>> In article >, Joe wrote:
>>>
>>>>> If they wouldn't care if was called a plymouth they wouldn't care if
>>>>> was called a Cuda either. It could be the Dodge Coelacanth....
>>>>> http://www.flmnh.ufl.edu/fish/InNews...toric2006.html
>>>
>>>> "'Cuda" means everything; Plymouth is simply not a factor.
>>> Probably close to what the marketeers thought about GTO over at GM.
>
>> It wasn't the name that killed the GTO it was the car they put it on.
>
> It was the expectations people had of the name, the car was true to the
> early version of the GTO.

Not hardly. It is a converted left hand drive import. Read up on the
early GTOs. There is little in common with the last one.

>> If D-C markets a Hemi Cuda worthy of the name it will sell regardless of
>> whether it is a Dodge or Plymouth. Like Joe said, I don't remember
>> hearing Plymouth Hemi Cuda much just Hemi Cuda.
>
> If it's worthy of the later car (as opposed to the early baracudas that
> only had thrifty inline 6s), the name won't matter.

Are you saying the early Cudas were not note worthy? My cousin hard one
and it wasn't a boring car. Well you do think the early GTOs were
boring so this opinion isn't much of a stretch for you. I'm glad you
agree that the name won't matter. Plymouth Hemi Cuda verses Chrysler
Hemi Cuda? Doesn't matter to me.