AutoBanter - View Single Post

*** US ***

On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 19:07:57 -0600, "Rocky" > wrote:

><* US *> wrote in message ...
>> On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 02:10:23 -0500, Dave Head > wrote:
>>
>>>...We were ATTACKED!...
>>
>> 9/11 was an inside job.
>
>and anybody who didn't know that fact on 9-11-01 needs help.
>
>Things I remember from watching TV on 9-11-01 we
>1. The jet that hit the South Tower did not look like a passenger jet. The
>bottom of the jet was wrong and it lacked windows. That is supported by:
>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=huK0MAb0Xa4
>
>2. When the two towers disintegrated they looked like controlled
>demolitions with the blast at the floor level starting from the top down
>instead of the bottom up. And by starting at the top down the perpetrators
>could easily draw attention to where the two jets hit much like you would do
>in a magic trick.
>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dUIYG4HKoiE
>
>3. At that time the Pentagon was the smoking gun for me because the damage
>done to the Pentagon was not consistent with the damage done to the Twin
>Towers. Plus if someone wanted to blame someone else for an attack they
>would have to do the initial attack themselves.
>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U1aBFbyN7xY
>
>Recently I have seen a video that explains how the Twin Towers were so
>preciously targeted at:
>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dr4BJ89Df5Q
>
>I have also saw a video that made me laugh because it shows Jane Standley
>with the BBC saying building 7 collapsed when it was clearly visible behind
>her.
>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-tGOt9f3gKk
>
>Since then I have come to the conclusion that Flight 93 was destined for
>building 7 of the World Trade Center and it was delayed on take off so it
>couldn't make it. Even though it didn't make it to it's target people on
>the ground destroyed building 7 anyway and then claimed a small fire took it
>down.
>
>One of the more recent smoking guns that I've found is the ground shook so
>bad before one of the twin towers disintegrated that it shook a camera on a
>tripod. That helps prove a controlled disintegration but I can't remember
>that exact video since I've seen so many recently. But there is so much
>other evidence supporting a controlled disintegration I'm not too worried
>about that video.
>
>If you think the news media has concealed evidence from us concerning 911
>you might be interested in:
>9/11 Blueprint for Truth presented by Architect Richard Gage, AIA
>http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...97765360042032
>or
>911 In Plane Site ~ Directors Cut
>http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...92821935314404
>or
>The Journal of 9/11 Research and 9/11 Issues
>http://www.drjudywood.com
>
>Rocky
>

Thanks for posting that.